Face Revitalization - Biolifting with MD-Tissue - Cyto-Solutions Ltd

More documents

Recommendations

Info

P H Y S I O L O G I C A L R E G U L AT I N G M E D I C I N E 2 0 1 210. To what extent do you think thatyour skin looks healthier?11. To what extent do you think thatthe product gives your skin a"comfortable" feeling?In the interpretation of the results it wasdecided to unify some votes to avoid dataloss.– The votes 9 and 10 are considered"very good"; 7 and 8 "good"; 6 "fair"; 3,4 and 5 "poor".– Skin elasticitymis and that the recovery distensibilitybriefs about the conditions of the elasticfibers (4).– Photographic documentationThe photographic documentation wasperformed with the computer system Visioface® Quick (full face photo analysis),CK electronic GmbH Koeln (Germany).RESULTS– Results of the measurement of skinelasticityThe results of the measurements of skinelasticity carried out on 15 volunteersat T0 (before treatment with revitalizingMD-Tissue) at T3 (1 week after the 3rdtreatment, i.e before the 4th) and at T6(1 week after the 6th and final treatment)are presented.– The measurement was always performedon the nasogenian folds.TAB. 1 lists all the numerical results of the15 volunteers with their values at T0, T3and T6.– Overall, there was a slight increase inskin elasticity after 3 weeks of treatment,and after 6 weeks, the values return almostto baseline. The average of the va-Skin elasticity is defined as the ability ofthe skin to stretch without breaking down,then returning to its original shape.It has been measured with the elastomer(Cutometer ® MPA 580, Courage-KhazakaElectronic GmbH, Koeln, Germany).Applied to the skin, this device performsa suction of a part of the skin and theheight reached by the aspirated layer refersto its degree of tensile distensibility;repeating several times the same maneuver,a further increase of skin distensibilitycan be observed – defined astensile stretching, which is evaluatedand recorded by the device.The latest and most refined dermatological-physiologicalresearch could findthat distensibility reflects the state ofhealth of the collagen fibers of the derlueswhich initially was 0.776 increaseson average to 0.802 after 3 weeksand then lowers again to 0.765.After 3 weeks of treatment, 11 out of 15volunteers (73.33%) show greater elasticitycompared to the beginning.Only 4 volunteers (number 3, 9, 10, 13)(26.33%) show a lowering of elasticityafter the first three treatments.After 6 weeks of treatment 9 voluntaryout of 15 (60%) have greater elasticitythan at the beginning, while 6 volunteers(number 1, 3, 10, 11, 13, 14)(40%) have a lowering of the elasticityunder values of T0.TAB. 2 represents graphically the resultsrecorded by the volunteers (1-15).– Results of photographic documentationVisioface ® QuickThe volume and depth of wrinkles werestudied with Visioface ® Quick and the dataprocessing was performed with theprogram Skin Surface Analyzer SSA.From the front picture of the complete faceit is chosen a small area located on theright or left nasogenian fold of each patient,this selected rectangular area correspondsto the "surface" of the wrinkle.The "depth" of the wrinkle is measuredin AU (Adimensional Unit).It is a measurement scale created on acolorimetric basis to give depth to theselected area.0,85000,80000,75000,70000,6500t0 t 3 weeks t 6 weeks123456789101112131415TAB. 2Skin elasticity,graphicalrepresentation foreach patient.18
L A M E D I C I N A B I O L O G I C A O T T O B R E - D I C E M B R E 2 0 1 2Wrinkle volume mm 2 X A.U.Volunteern. t0 t 3 weeks t 6 weeks %1 0,4500 0,4500 0,3200 -28,92 0,2400 0,2000 0,2200 -8,33 0,1000 0,0900 0,0900 -10,04 0,1300 0,1600 0,1000 -23,15 0,8100 0,8500 0,7200 -11,16 0,2800 0,2300 0,2400 -14,37 0,2300 0,2300 0,1900 -17,48 0,2100 0,2500 0,2000 -4,89 0,1700 0,1900 0,1700 0,010 0,0800 0,0900 0,0800 0,011 0,3800 0,3600 0,3200 -15,812 0,1100 0,1000 0,1000 -9,113 0,5300 0,4000 0,4800 -9,414 0,2200 0,2400 0,2000 -9,115 0,1600 0,1500 0,1200 -25,0Average 0,273 0,266 0,237Dev. STD 0,19722 0,19449 0,17182∆% -2,7 -13,4TAB. 3Wrinkle volumemm 2 2 X A.U. withdecreasepercentage of eachpatient after 6-weektreatment.The "volume" of the wrinkle is the resultof the following calculation:Volume of the wrinkle (mm (2)) = AU xheight (mm) x width (mm) x depth.The volume of wrinkles was reducedby a total of 2.7% after 3 weeks and13.4% after 6 weeks of treatment.The values ranged from 0% to 28.9%.– Results of self-assessmentHere below are shown the 11 questionsalong with the opinions expressed invotes and in percentage to which the 15patients of the trial replied:1. To what extent do you think that theproduct reduces the visibility of theexpression lines?– The ability to reduce the visibilityof the expression lines is consideredby 80% of patients "good", by6.67% "fair" and by 13.33% “poor”.2. To what extent do you think that theproduct reduces the visibility of microwrinkles?– The ability to reduce the visibilityof micro wrinkles is considered by13.33% of patients "very good", by53.33% "good", by 20% "fair" andby 13.33% "poor".3. To what extent do you think thatyour wrinkles are less deep?– The perception of less deep wrinklesis for 6.67% of patients "verygood", for 80% "good" and for13.33% "poor".4. To what extent do you think that theproduct increases the skin elasticity?– The increase in the skin elasticityis perceived by 86.67% of patientsto be "good" and by 13.33% "fair".5. To what extent do you feel that theproduct increases the brightness ofyour skin?– The increase in brightness is held“very good” by 13.33% of the patients,“good” by 66.67%, “fair” by6.67% "fair" and “poor” by 13.33%.6. To what extent do you think thatyour skin looks fresher / revitalized?– The perception of a fresh and revitalizedskin is for 13.33% of patients"very good", for 66.67%"good" and for 20% "fair”.7. To what extent do you think thatthe product increases your skinfirmness?– The increase in firmness is consideredby 6.67% of patients "verygood", by 73.33% "good" and by20% "fair".8. To what extent do you think thatthe product increases your skinsmoothness?– The increase in smoothness isperceived by 6.67% of patients as"very good", by 60% "good" andby 33.33% "fair".9. To what extent do you think thatthe product improves your skintexture?– The improvement in the skin textureis considered by 6.67% of patients"very good", by 46.67%"good" and by 46.67% "fair".10. To what extent do you think thatyour skin looks healthier?– The perception of a healthier skinis for 6.67% of patients "verygood", for 80% "good" and for13.33% "fair”.11. To what extent do you think thatthe product gives your skin a19
Page 1: P H Y S I O L O G I C A L R E G U L
Page 6: L A M E D I C I N A B I O L O G I C

Face Revitalization - Biolifting with MD-Tissue - Cyto-Solutions Ltd

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?