10.07.2015 Views

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. WL Gore

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. WL Gore

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. WL Gore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

United States Court of Appealsfor the Federal Circuit__________________________BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.AND DAVID GOLDFARB, M.D.,Plaintiffs/CounterclaimDefendants-Appellees,ANDC.R. BARD, INC.,Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,v.W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.,Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant.__________________________2010-1510__________________________Appeal from the United States District Court for theDistrict of Arizona in Case No. 03-CV-0597, Judge MaryH. Murguia.__________________________NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting.The court today holds that a person who performs therequested test of a material that is provided to him fortesting for a specified use, can then, when the test issuccessful, patent the material he was provided, for theuse for which it was tested. My colleagues hold that Dr.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!