A framework for transforming learning in schools: Innovation and the spiral <strong>of</strong> inquiry 15wisdom because they have not been part <strong>of</strong> thedecision-making and analysis process. Throughthe spiral <strong>of</strong> inquiry, teachers are directlyengaged in a collaborative analysis <strong>of</strong> what isgoing on for their learners; their motivation fornew learning is enhanced because <strong>of</strong> the directconnection to their own contexts.The main challenge at this stage is to decidewhat to learn and how to learn it. In all theexamples we have used so far, the educatorsinvolved have accessed current knowledgeand expertise in their area <strong>of</strong> focus, on whichto base their learning for future action. Forexample, the secondary school that found outabout the negative reputation <strong>of</strong> the school inthe community studied the research on socialemotionallearning. The rural elementaryschool where everyone needed to learn moreabout inferencing, in making meaning fromtext, engaged in two years <strong>of</strong> deep pr<strong>of</strong>essionallearning.Repeatedly we say to the educators with whomwe work that ignoring the current researchevidence on what makes a difference to learnersand to learning is the educational equivalent <strong>of</strong>malpractice. There is a lot <strong>of</strong> robust informationregarding how young people learn particularsubject-matter, what underlies high intellectualengagement and how to promote powerfulsocial-emotional learning. The OECD learningprinciples identify the important attributes <strong>of</strong>intellectually engaging learning environments.All <strong>of</strong> this knowledge needs to inform ourdecisions about where to go with our own newlearning.This contemporary knowledge about learning,however, has to be adapted to make it relevantto our particular environments. Simplyunderstanding the importance <strong>of</strong> stretchingall students does not tell us what this mightlook like for our students, nor how to do it.Knowing about the impact <strong>of</strong> assessment forlearning is important. However, unless wehave collectively developed expertise in settingclear learning intentions, and in providingeffective feedback, we cannot help learnersdevelop a deeper understanding <strong>of</strong> where theyare going with their learning – and how to getthere. Building horizontal connections withthe community or the environment will lookdifferent in Vancouver from how it does inMelbourne or Auckland. Connections withcommunity may look even more different inHaida Gwaii 2 , Darwin 3 or Kaitaia 4 .we have seen far too <strong>of</strong>ten that pr<strong>of</strong>essionallearning can be derailed by what is convenient,expedient, readily available or popular.When making changes to our practice, it isimportant to know why a particular principle orapproach is important. We all need to know whynew ways <strong>of</strong> doing things are better than whatwe did before. Otherwise, the way in which wemodify our practice is unlikely to be consistentwith the theory underpinning the principles,and we risk diluting them or changing them inways that will not work. For example, if newlearning is about intellectual engagement, thenwe need to explore new knowledge about selfregulationand metacognition. We also need tounderstand the connections among assessmentpractices, motivation and engagement.If the new learning is about improvingemotional wellbeing, then what is knownabout social-emotional learning and the impacton learner outcomes is more relevant. Ensuringthat we understand why these approachesare important – and the complex knowledgerequired to do them well – helps us to avoid therisks <strong>of</strong> shallow implementation. Deeper forms<strong>of</strong> adult pr<strong>of</strong>essional learning are required fortransformative practices.Design challengesThe first consideration is to ensure that newlearning is directly connected to the focusthat has been determined and informed by thehunches that were developed. This may seemself-evident but we have seen far too <strong>of</strong>ten thatpr<strong>of</strong>essional learning can be derailed by whatis convenient, expedient, readily available orpopular.
16 Centre for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper No. 234, April 2014A second and significant design challenge at thisstage is to find ways to free up time for everyoneto be deeply engaged in new learning, blendedwith different ways <strong>of</strong> teaching and leading.This is not the time for one-shot wonders thatnever work for real change anyway. Rather it isa process <strong>of</strong> exploring why a new strategy mightwork, trying it out, reviewing it with others andmodifying it to try again.Are all those meetings we have helping totransform our school to make it dramaticallybetter for our learners?’ Fortunately at ourschool the answer to this question is …‘Yes!’Secondary PrincipalThe pr<strong>of</strong>essional learning research evidenceindicates that the integration <strong>of</strong> substantialnew knowledge requires a minimum <strong>of</strong> ayear <strong>of</strong> focused collaborative effort to make adifference. Two years is much better. With threeyears <strong>of</strong> intensive engaged effort, movementtowards a transformed learning environmentis usually well under way. So space must becreated for this to happen.Designing powerful learning also involvesidentifying the expertise required to supporteveryone to gain new knowledge and deepentheir skills. Simply devoting extra time withoutaccessing expertise does not work. The neededexpertise may be within the school, the district,or found on-line. It may be within a localuniversity or it may be in another setting along way away.We all benefit from expertise <strong>of</strong> the kind thatwalks alongside us to guide our learning, whichhelps us to understand what the new practicesactually look like and why they are better, andwhich thoughtfully critiques our efforts to makeus more productive for our learners.When considering what expertise to drawupon, our advice is to be wary <strong>of</strong> pre-packagedsolutions. Although some might be useful,others treat teachers as technicians who canbe introduced to a new set <strong>of</strong> strategies andthen be expected to implement them. Packagedsolutions are likely to ignore important earlyphases <strong>of</strong> the spiral, the complexity <strong>of</strong> teachingand leading, and disregard the importance<strong>of</strong> being responsive to the learning needs <strong>of</strong>students within a unique context.Determining the focus for new pr<strong>of</strong>essionallearning through a collaborative inquiryapproach is respectful and we know it worksin a variety <strong>of</strong> settings. We have seen thatas teachers become more confident with theinquiry process, and with co-creating theirown learning, they become increasingly curiousabout other strategies and approaches to meetthe needs <strong>of</strong> their learners more effectively.From new learning comes new action – andinnovative practices begin to multiply. See Box6 for an outline <strong>of</strong> what new learning is andwhat it is not.Box 6. What new learning is and is notWhat new learning isNew learning is■■motivated by and connected to changing thelearning experiences <strong>of</strong> learners;■■directly linked to the focus identified in the earlierphase <strong>of</strong> the spiral;■■about understanding why new ways <strong>of</strong> doing thingsare better than previous practices;■■sustained and supported over time.What new learning is notNew learning is not■■about what someone else thinks would be useful– or readily available;■■Disconnected from the context;■■just about a set <strong>of</strong> strategies, without deeperunderstanding <strong>of</strong> the purpose;■■short-term or a quick fix.