Presentation: "Empire State Building Case Study" - The Empire State ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OVERARCHING MESSAGEThere is a compelling need as well as an economic casefor reducing greenhouse gas emissions in existingbuildings. The Empire State Building case study providesan example of how this can be done. However, significantchallenges remain that must be addressed in order toquickly and cost-effectively capture the full greenhousegas reduction opportunity for building retrofits on awidespread basis.2
PRESENTATION OVERVIEWI. Motivation: The retrofit of the Empire State Building was motivated by the owners desire toreduce greenhouse gas emissions, to demonstrate how to retrofit large commercial buildings costeffectively, and to demonstrate that such work makes good business sense.II.III.Project Development Process: Using ESB as a convening point, a collaborativeteam was formed to develop the optimal retrofit solution through an iterative process that involvedexperience, energy and financial modeling, ratings, metrics, and robust debate.Key Findings: At current energy costs, ESB can cost-effectively reduce energy use by38% and save (a minimum of) 105,000 metric tons of CO2 over the next 15 years.IV. Implementation: Three different stakeholders will implement the 8 savings measures overa 5-year period using various implementation mechanisms.V. Key Lessons: Key lessons relate to strategies to maximize cost-effective savings,balancing CO2 savings with economics, and streamlining the project development process.VI. Industry Needs: Challenges in each stage of the retrofit process are hindering theachievement of long-term goals.3
Page 1: Empire State Building Case StudyCos
Page 5 and 6: I. MOTIVATION1) Prove or disprove t
Page 7 and 8: I. MOTIVATION1) Prove or disprove t
Page 9 and 10: I. MOTIVATION2) Create a replicable
Page 11 and 12: I. MOTIVATIONThe retrofit of the Em
Page 13 and 14: Million Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxi
Page 15 and 16: I. MOTIVATION“The goal with ESB h
Page 17 and 18: II. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS1) F
Page 19 and 20: II. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS1) F
Page 21 and 22: ActivitiesOutputsII. PROJECT DEVELO
Page 23 and 24: Absolute Metric Tons of CO2Dollars
Page 25 and 26: II. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS3) A
Page 27 and 28: Net Present Value of Package of Mea
Page 29 and 30: III. KEY FINDINGS1) Eight interacti
Page 41 and 42: III. KEY FINDINGS2) Key reductions
Page 43 and 44: III. KEY FINDINGSAt current energy
Page 45 and 46: III. KEY FINDINGSAt current energy
Page 47 and 48: III. KEY FINDINGS4) Various green c
Page 49 and 50: Annual Energy Savings (kBtu)IV. IMP
Page 51 and 52: IV. IMPLEMENTATION1) Three stakehol
Page 53 and 54:
IV. IMPLEMENTATION1) Three stakehol
Page 55 and 56:
IV. IMPLEMENTATIONClear energy targ
Page 57 and 58:
IV. IMPLEMENTATIONClear energy targ
Page 59 and 60:
V. LESSONS LEARNEDKey lessons learn
Page 61 and 62:
Net Present Value of Package of Mea
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Net Present Value of Package of Mea
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
VI. INDUSTRY NEEDSThis project was
Page 71 and 72:
VI. INDUSTRY NEEDSa) Select the rig
Page 73 and 74:
VI. INDUSTRY NEEDSc) Develop better
Page 75 and 76:
VI. INDUSTRY NEEDSe) Increase workf
Page 77 and 78:
VI. INDUSTRY NEEDSg) Determine solu
Page 79 and 80:
CONCLUSIONThere is a compelling nee
show all

Presentation: "Empire State Building Case Study" - The Empire State ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?