social class. "Brahma-jnanititi brahmana" -- a brahmana is one who has brahmajnana,spiritual knowledge.Astrology, tarot and so much other Vedic knowledge comprises aparatattva(material knowledge). These have their place, no doubt. There's a purport inthe 3rd Canto chapter about Kardama Muni's renunciation in which SrilaPrabhupada explains the importace of marriage arrangements between compatiblepartners, and how astrology was employed for that purpose. Yet these things arenot essential. Just see: astrology and Tarot are still practiced in the West,but spiritual culture is lost.Regarding preaching from Tarot cards, this sounds like a receipe for a goodevening's entertainment. But I think the transmission of spiritual knowledgewould be severely hampered in such a circumstance, unless the preacher wasextraordinarily intelligent and convincing. Fortune tellers, therapists,astrologers and so on are just servants of people's karma. The demigods arelikewise servants of our karma; people worship demigods not to get free ofkarma, but to speed up good reactions and slow down bad reactions. The samemotive is there in those who visit fortune tellers and such.You lived in North America for most of your life, so you may have heard of PaulWinchell and Jerry Mahoney. These were TV entertainers. Paul was aventriloquist. Jerry was his dummy. Yet their exchange was so lifelike, youforgot that Jerry Mahoney was just a big wooden-headed doll sitting on Paul'slap. Tarot card readers and astrologers do not occupy a role conducive topreaching. Their role is more like that of Jerry Mahoney--they just reflect thekarma of the ventriloquist.Text by Premarnava dasMarch 28, <strong>1995</strong>, 09:35 SWTSubject: The Secret is out....------------------------------------------------------------What's your comment on that one, Hap?Comment by <strong>Suhotra</strong> SwamiMarch 28, <strong>1995</strong>, 12:40 SWTSubject: Enough is enough------------------------------------------------------------This conference is slipping out of control. Some of the senior members havesent in private letters of complaint. So everybody calm down now. I want to get(Have) <strong>Danda</strong> (Will Travel) back to its original Krsna conscious mood. Which wasnot unfunny. But it can't be totally looney, either.Bhakta Hap Camper has a private COM address.further, do it there.If anyone wants to debate himHap, you are forbidden to write any more off-the-wall texts into thisconference. Your last one, with the quotes, was not too bad as a response tothe utterly texts that Premarnava Prabhu imported into <strong>Danda</strong>. Butenough is enough.MEMORYText by <strong>Suhotra</strong> SwamiMarch 28, <strong>1995</strong>A great memory does not make a mind, any more than a dictionary is a piece ofliterature. A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker. Aman is not considered a good man because he is a good talker. Culture is to
emember and speak the best that has been thought and said in the history of theworld: katha eva kathasu saram, the essence of all topics, Krsna katha. Sarammeans essence. Even if one remembers only a drop of that essence, his memory isperfectly cultivated, because as it is said, "One drop of the ocean of divinenectar would drown the whole world." As the soil, however rich it may be,cannot be productive without cultivation, so the memory without culture cannever produce good fruit.Comment by <strong>Suhotra</strong> SwamiMarch 28, <strong>1995</strong>Subject: The recent madness has been consigned to the Oblivion conference ...------------------------------------------------------------...by the vigilant sysop. Those texts are no longer accssible through the <strong>Danda</strong>conference.BELATED COMMENT ON HUBBARD JUNKText by <strong>Suhotra</strong> SwamiMarch 29, <strong>1995</strong>Today I read that download of that internet bulletin on the "secret scripture"junk of L Ron Hubbard. It goes without saying that it is completely bonkers.But it is also interesting to note that Hubbard seems to have tapped into thesame sort of astral "space-opera" as did one Richard Shaver. I'll try to avoida too-detailed explanation, but the Shaver Mystery, as it is commonly called,predates Scientology by a good many years. It started in the late '40's whenRay Palmer, the editor of a US science fiction magazine, publicized the "racialmemories" of Mr. Shaver which Palmer happened to find in a a waste paper basketin his magazine's office. His assistant editor had thrown Shaver's letter inthe trash, considering it lunacy. But Palmer was intrigued by Shaver's story(full of cryptic jargon not unlike Hubbard's) about the hidden history of PlanetEarth involving Teros (deva-like spacemen) and Deros (demons who live below theearth, who operate magic-tech machinery to harrass humanity). Human beings weresupposedly cultured millions of years ago by the Teros. Now, according toShaver, the Teros are somewhere in space, and we are left at the mercy of theevil Deros and their underground mind-warping ray projectors. Palmer rewroteShaver's letter as a 30 000 word article entitled "I Remember Lemuria!" that hepublished in the next issue of his 'zine. It sent shockwaves all across theUnited States, bringing in many thousands of letters of reader response.Typically, these people claimed to have similar insights, memories and evendirect contact with the Deros and Teros. Thus the Shaver Mystery was born. Itlasted well into the 50's, and then faded away. But by that time, Hubbard (whohad been a science fiction hack) had started his Dianetics movement. There wasalso another early '50's science fiction writer named Philip K. Dick who tappedinto a similar mystical/technical quasi religious state of mind. He didn'tstart a cult, but he wrote what are celebrated today as "cult" stories. One ofhis last books was called VALIS, which presented an autobiographical account ofDick's sci-fi religious hallucinations. Clearly, it could have bečíme"scripture" like Hubbard's had Dick not been too psychologically broken to tryseeking popularity as a cult leader. A very popular Hollywood film, BladeRunner, was based on a PK Dick story.Anyway ... I just wanted to say that Hubbard's genre is not unique, and he isnot the first in this line. It is just weirdness, of course, but it is p o w er f u l weirdness that seems to have burst out all at once in the late '40's --from somewhere down below. Along with the flying saucer phenomena, it wouldappear.
- Page 1 and 2: DANDA1995Questions and AnswerswithH
- Page 3 and 4: I have already replied to the argum
- Page 5 and 6: Similarly, in an ISKCON temple, a d
- Page 7 and 8: even be well-intentioned (let the c
- Page 9 and 10: Answer by Suhotra SwamiJanuary 15,
- Page 11 and 12: Comment by Vipramukhya SwamiI've me
- Page 13 and 14: i.e. his visible form).to.In the pr
- Page 15 and 16: 1. The self-realization stage just
- Page 17 and 18: ksatriya families worshiped Radha-K
- Page 19 and 20: are banished from Kailasa by being
- Page 21 and 22: always in competition with each oth
- Page 23 and 24: Was that enough, Bhakta Jan? No? OK
- Page 25 and 26: prakampanaloka-gurusrastaparasmai t
- Page 27 and 28: That's they quoted from me.In the c
- Page 29 and 30: to tell how he was abducted to anot
- Page 31: to come, and these ten avatars corr
- Page 35 and 36: devotees, but I gave them as exampl
- Page 37 and 38: CAITANYA UPANISADQuestion from Mukh
- Page 39 and 40: for that. So that... This is going
- Page 41 and 42: A footnote to the previous text:It
- Page 43 and 44: other planets encircle the polestar
- Page 45 and 46: TIME PERCEPTIONQuestions from Rohit
- Page 47 and 48: Answer by Suhotra SwamiJune 27, 199
- Page 49 and 50: connected to the Lord's body. And B
- Page 51 and 52: - How to understand there was no cr
- Page 53 and 54: SB 6.14.55 p., 1st par.: The subtle
- Page 55 and 56: could not even get that. And they l
- Page 57 and 58: "Krsna is the supreme living being.
- Page 59 and 60: Answer by Suhotra SwamiSeptember 26
- Page 61 and 62: Answer by Suhotra SwamiOctober 11,
- Page 63 and 64: Vidyabhusana that argued yet anothe
- Page 65 and 66: SELF-ENVYQuestions from Vrajendra K
- Page 67 and 68: I was studying the second canto cha
- Page 69 and 70: Answer by Suhotra SwamiNovember 11,
- Page 71 and 72: Answer by Suhotra SwamiNovember 11,
- Page 73 and 74: ATHEISMQuestion from Jahnu dasNovem
- Page 75 and 76: two years old and under, in accorda
- Page 77 and 78: that sense one would think the exte
- Page 79 and 80: 1) Yes, the message of Jesus is uni
- Page 81 and 82: Paul rationalized that Jesus surviv
- Page 83 and 84:
The publication I am working on in
- Page 85 and 86:
- From the context of the second qu
- Page 87 and 88:
Dear Maharaja,I see that it is a qu
- Page 89:
associates, etc. Lord Vamana has Hi