23.11.2012 Views

Approach Paper for the Twelfth Five Year Plan - of Planning ...

Approach Paper for the Twelfth Five Year Plan - of Planning ...

Approach Paper for the Twelfth Five Year Plan - of Planning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36 <strong>Approach</strong> to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Twelfth</strong> <strong>Five</strong> <strong>Year</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> clean energy <strong>for</strong> both rural and urban consumption. These programmes need to be widened and<br />

streng<strong>the</strong>ned.<br />

Coal<br />

3.37 The demand <strong>for</strong> coal has risen by about 8.0 per cent per annum during <strong>the</strong> Eleventh <strong>Plan</strong> and may<br />

rise by about <strong>the</strong> same magnitude during <strong>the</strong> <strong>Twelfth</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. Coal output expanded at about 7.0 per cent<br />

per year in <strong>the</strong> five-year period <strong>of</strong> 2004-05 to 2009-10, with especially strong growth in both 2008-09<br />

and 2009-10. However, in 2010-11 coal production remained stagnant. Domestic coal production was<br />

originally targeted to reach 680 mt in <strong>the</strong> Eleventh <strong>Plan</strong>. This was scaled down to 630 mt in <strong>the</strong> Mid Term<br />

Appraisal and it is now expected to be only 554 mt. Of <strong>the</strong> 208 captive coal blocks allotted with 49 billion<br />

tonnes <strong>of</strong> reserves and a production potential <strong>of</strong> 657 mt per annum, <strong>the</strong> estimated annual production by<br />

<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Eleventh <strong>Plan</strong> is only 37 mt.<br />

3.38 Given <strong>the</strong> strong growth in <strong>the</strong>rmal generation projected in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Twelfth</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, <strong>the</strong> aggregate demand<br />

<strong>for</strong> coal at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Twelfth</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is likely to be between 900 and 1,000 million tonnes depending<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> pace <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> power capacity. As against <strong>the</strong> projected demand <strong>of</strong> 900–1,000<br />

million metric tonnes (mt) by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Twelfth</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, <strong>the</strong> domestic output is unlikely to exceed<br />

750 mt leaving more than 200 mt shortfall to be met from imports. Even this assumes that domestic<br />

output will be able to increase by over 200 mt from current levels.<br />

Fuel Supply Agreements<br />

3.39 Uncertainties in coal supply are already affecting <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> generating capacity. Coal<br />

India is not entering into Fuel Supply Arrangements <strong>for</strong> more than 50.0 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>rmal plants, and that too only <strong>for</strong> five years. Private sector investors in power generation are unlikely<br />

to be able to access financing from banks if <strong>the</strong>re is uncertainty about coal supplies. Although coal is<br />

importable, coal imports are much more expensive and power producers are reluctant to accept a fuel<br />

supply arrangement based on imported coal which would put <strong>the</strong>m at a disadvantage. If domestic coal<br />

prices were aligned with world prices this problem would not arise. However, such a large adjustment may<br />

not be easy to achieve in a short period. CIL should explore <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> developing a mechanism<br />

to enable power producers procure a mix <strong>of</strong> domestic and imported coal consistent with <strong>the</strong>ir technical<br />

constraints.<br />

3.40 It is necessary to introduce a system <strong>of</strong> pooling domestic and imported coal prices <strong>for</strong> power<br />

producers so that <strong>the</strong> price <strong>the</strong>y are charged does not depend upon whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y receive domestic or<br />

imported coal.<br />

Environment Constraints<br />

3.41 An important reason <strong>for</strong> low production in domestic production <strong>of</strong> coal is <strong>the</strong> inadequate<br />

incentive with <strong>the</strong> States to increase coal production. In addition, <strong>the</strong>re have been, in <strong>the</strong> recent years,<br />

constraints due to tighter environmental regulations, problems in Resettlement & Rehabilitation (R&R),<br />

and also problems in land acquisition. The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment & Forests had adopted a policy <strong>of</strong><br />

‘Go-No Go’ in which coal mining was completely banned in ‘No Go’ areas. However, as large coal<br />

bearing areas were suddenly declared ‘No Go’ areas, this would have severely limited <strong>the</strong> ability to expand<br />

domestic production <strong>of</strong> coal. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, Comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index (CEPI) norms were<br />

introduced which prohibited mining in areas with a high pollution index, even if <strong>the</strong> pollution was due

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!