Perceptions of Security and Reassurance at the ... - School of Law
Perceptions of Security and Reassurance at the ... - School of Law
Perceptions of Security and Reassurance at the ... - School of Law
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
As for records <strong>of</strong> interviews, <strong>the</strong> Terrorism Act2000 (Code <strong>of</strong> Practice on Audio Recording <strong>of</strong>Interviews) Order 2001 56 allows for a code <strong>of</strong>practice in connection with <strong>the</strong> audio recording.The Terrorism Act 2000 (Code <strong>of</strong> Practice onAudio Recording <strong>of</strong> Interviews) (No 2) Order2001 57 dem<strong>and</strong>s th<strong>at</strong> any interview shall be recordedin accordance with <strong>the</strong> audio code. The audiorecording <strong>of</strong> interviews shall be carried out openly,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> interview rooms <strong>at</strong> Paddington Greencontain obvious banks <strong>of</strong> equipment. The whole <strong>of</strong>each interview shall be audio recorded, including<strong>the</strong> taking <strong>and</strong> reading back <strong>of</strong> any st<strong>at</strong>ement. Inthis way, <strong>the</strong>re is no provision for ‘<strong>of</strong>f-<strong>the</strong>-record’convers<strong>at</strong>ions, though <strong>the</strong>re is no definition <strong>of</strong>‘interview’ <strong>and</strong> ‘public safety interviews’ apparentlydo not count. 58The Terrorism Act 2000 (Video Recording <strong>of</strong>Interviews) Order 2000 59 provides for interviewsonly in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Irel<strong>and</strong> to be recorded by videowith sound, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> current Terrorism Act2000 (Code <strong>of</strong> Practice on Video Recording <strong>of</strong>Interviews) (Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Irel<strong>and</strong>) Order 2003 60 allowsfor a detailed code <strong>of</strong> practice. There is norequirement for routine video recording <strong>of</strong>interviews in Britain, though custody areas may berecorded, 61 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> police <strong>of</strong>ten favour <strong>the</strong> videorecording<strong>of</strong> interviews.With all <strong>the</strong>se safeguards in place, can British security authorities deal effectively with <strong>the</strong> 'tickingbomb' scenario <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> tempt<strong>at</strong>ions to apply torture to avert an outrage? Leaving aside <strong>the</strong>spuriousness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>tical, any dilemma has in practice been answered by ‘safety interview’ -an <strong>of</strong>f-<strong>the</strong>-record interview in order to protect life or against serious property damage. 62Family <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r contactsRights to have a person informed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> detention are granted by <strong>the</strong> Terrorism Act 2000, whichplaces gre<strong>at</strong>er emphasis than normal on <strong>the</strong> grant <strong>of</strong> family visits. At Paddington Green, familyvisits are infrequent, but telephone contacts are daily.Independent custody visitors may <strong>at</strong>tend under <strong>the</strong> usual rules. Code H also envisages <strong>the</strong>possibility <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r '<strong>of</strong>ficial' visitors, including accredited faith represent<strong>at</strong>ives, members <strong>of</strong>Parliament, <strong>and</strong> public <strong>of</strong>ficials (such security agents) needing to interview <strong>the</strong> prisoner in <strong>the</strong>course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir duties. There is no right <strong>of</strong> access in <strong>the</strong>se cases, <strong>and</strong> custody <strong>of</strong>ficers 'should have56 SI 2001/159.57 SI 2001/189. PACE Code E is not applicable: para 3.2.58 R v Ibrahim [2008] EWCA Crim 880.59 SI 2000/3179.60 SI 2003/110.61 PACE Code H para 3.11; PACE Code F para 3.2.62 See R v Ibrahim [2008] EWCA Crim 880.67