10.07.2015 Views

Perceptions of Security and Reassurance at the ... - School of Law

Perceptions of Security and Reassurance at the ... - School of Law

Perceptions of Security and Reassurance at the ... - School of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As for records <strong>of</strong> interviews, <strong>the</strong> Terrorism Act2000 (Code <strong>of</strong> Practice on Audio Recording <strong>of</strong>Interviews) Order 2001 56 allows for a code <strong>of</strong>practice in connection with <strong>the</strong> audio recording.The Terrorism Act 2000 (Code <strong>of</strong> Practice onAudio Recording <strong>of</strong> Interviews) (No 2) Order2001 57 dem<strong>and</strong>s th<strong>at</strong> any interview shall be recordedin accordance with <strong>the</strong> audio code. The audiorecording <strong>of</strong> interviews shall be carried out openly,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> interview rooms <strong>at</strong> Paddington Greencontain obvious banks <strong>of</strong> equipment. The whole <strong>of</strong>each interview shall be audio recorded, including<strong>the</strong> taking <strong>and</strong> reading back <strong>of</strong> any st<strong>at</strong>ement. Inthis way, <strong>the</strong>re is no provision for ‘<strong>of</strong>f-<strong>the</strong>-record’convers<strong>at</strong>ions, though <strong>the</strong>re is no definition <strong>of</strong>‘interview’ <strong>and</strong> ‘public safety interviews’ apparentlydo not count. 58The Terrorism Act 2000 (Video Recording <strong>of</strong>Interviews) Order 2000 59 provides for interviewsonly in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Irel<strong>and</strong> to be recorded by videowith sound, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> current Terrorism Act2000 (Code <strong>of</strong> Practice on Video Recording <strong>of</strong>Interviews) (Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Irel<strong>and</strong>) Order 2003 60 allowsfor a detailed code <strong>of</strong> practice. There is norequirement for routine video recording <strong>of</strong>interviews in Britain, though custody areas may berecorded, 61 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> police <strong>of</strong>ten favour <strong>the</strong> videorecording<strong>of</strong> interviews.With all <strong>the</strong>se safeguards in place, can British security authorities deal effectively with <strong>the</strong> 'tickingbomb' scenario <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> tempt<strong>at</strong>ions to apply torture to avert an outrage? Leaving aside <strong>the</strong>spuriousness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>tical, any dilemma has in practice been answered by ‘safety interview’ -an <strong>of</strong>f-<strong>the</strong>-record interview in order to protect life or against serious property damage. 62Family <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r contactsRights to have a person informed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> detention are granted by <strong>the</strong> Terrorism Act 2000, whichplaces gre<strong>at</strong>er emphasis than normal on <strong>the</strong> grant <strong>of</strong> family visits. At Paddington Green, familyvisits are infrequent, but telephone contacts are daily.Independent custody visitors may <strong>at</strong>tend under <strong>the</strong> usual rules. Code H also envisages <strong>the</strong>possibility <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r '<strong>of</strong>ficial' visitors, including accredited faith represent<strong>at</strong>ives, members <strong>of</strong>Parliament, <strong>and</strong> public <strong>of</strong>ficials (such security agents) needing to interview <strong>the</strong> prisoner in <strong>the</strong>course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir duties. There is no right <strong>of</strong> access in <strong>the</strong>se cases, <strong>and</strong> custody <strong>of</strong>ficers 'should have56 SI 2001/159.57 SI 2001/189. PACE Code E is not applicable: para 3.2.58 R v Ibrahim [2008] EWCA Crim 880.59 SI 2000/3179.60 SI 2003/110.61 PACE Code H para 3.11; PACE Code F para 3.2.62 See R v Ibrahim [2008] EWCA Crim 880.67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!