10.07.2015 Views

3 The market for impulse ice cream [per] - Competition Commission

3 The market for impulse ice cream [per] - Competition Commission

3 The market for impulse ice cream [per] - Competition Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.78. Martin told us that during an eight-week trial ending in October 1992 it had ex<strong>per</strong>ienced a 15 <strong>per</strong> centincrease in sales in 30 of its outlets where there was an `industry' cabinet, as compared with sales from twoseparate freezers (a large one from BEW and a smaller one from Mars). We were later told that this figure hadnot been confirmed by ex<strong>per</strong>ience over a longer <strong>per</strong>iod in 1993 and in a wider range of outlets. Martin estimatedthat the increase in sales was between zero and 2 <strong>per</strong> cent. However, the move to non-exclusive freezers was stillregarded as worthwhile because of better utilization of space and savings in running costs (see also paragraph8.25).3.79. Merrett told us that 1993 had been a poor year <strong>for</strong> <strong>ice</strong> <strong>cream</strong> sales and that in 34 of its outlets sales were12 <strong>per</strong> cent below those in 1992. In the three outlets where there was an industry freezer rather than both a BEWand Mars freezer sales were lower in 1993 compared with the previous year by between 4 and 15 <strong>per</strong> cent.Merrett said that it had allocated 60 <strong>per</strong> cent of the three industry cabinets to BEW (including all but fourproducts from the BEW range) and 40 <strong>per</strong> cent to Mars. <strong>The</strong> company said that it preferred a single freezerbecause this gave a more professional serv<strong>ice</strong> to customers as well as being chea<strong>per</strong> to run, manage and maintainthan was the case with two cabinets (see also paragraph 8.30).Retail and pricing policyRetail pr<strong>ice</strong>s3.80. <strong>The</strong> leading manufacturers of <strong>impulse</strong> <strong>ice</strong> <strong>cream</strong> determine recommended retail pr<strong>ice</strong>s (RRPs) each yearwell be<strong>for</strong>e the start of the summer season. <strong>The</strong>se pr<strong>ice</strong>s do not change during the year save in exceptionalcircumstances such as the increase in VAT rates in the 1991 Budget.3.81. We were told that RRPs are generally observed in independent CTNs but this is not the case in leisurecentres, petrol <strong>for</strong>ecourts, motorway serv<strong>ice</strong> stations and some convenience stores, where actual retail pr<strong>ice</strong>s canbe significantly higher than those recommended. BEW told us that one of the larger CTN chains does not adhereto RRPs in selling <strong>impulse</strong> <strong>ice</strong> <strong>cream</strong> in its outlets but adds 2p to the RRP on all lines stocked. It is not usual <strong>for</strong>retailers to charge pr<strong>ice</strong>s below RRP.3.82. In recent years manufacturers have shown a preference <strong>for</strong> `rounded number' pr<strong>ice</strong>s, ie multiples of 5pand 10p. However, in the children's segment of the <strong>market</strong> there is a belief that custom is particularly pr<strong>ice</strong>sensitiveand some pr<strong>ice</strong>s are set below rounded numbers.3.83. Table 3.8 shows the recommended retail pr<strong>ice</strong>s of 50 branded lines in seven categories of the <strong>impulse</strong><strong>market</strong>. Within the chocolate bar category the average pr<strong>ice</strong> of BEW brands (55p) exceeds that of Nestlé/LyonsMaid brands (46p). <strong>The</strong> average pr<strong>ice</strong> of the five Mars brands, 57p, is the highest of these three suppliers. In thecase of cones, BEW and Nestlé/Lyons Maid each sell two brands at the same pr<strong>ice</strong>. In the adult stick categoryMagnum is pr<strong>ice</strong>d at a small premium to both the Mars Galaxy Dove and the Nestlé Chocolate brands. <strong>The</strong>re isno pr<strong>ice</strong> differential between Feast and Nestlé Mint Crisp and Toffee Crumble. All six brands within the adultrefreshment category have recommended retail pr<strong>ice</strong>s of 55p or 60p. <strong>The</strong>re is a wide range of pr<strong>ice</strong>s in thecategory of children's novelty products.33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!