BC Regional Airports - Northwest Corridor Development Corporation

Draft Report: Regional Airports: A Policy Guide to Viability Page 305.0 An Action Plan for SuccessThis section provides an action plan for the key stakeholders to follow to enhance theviability of B.C.’s regional airports. This plan is based on the conclusions reached in thisdiscussion paper:• there is a viability issue for regional airports• this issue arose in part from the manner in which the NAP was implemented, and hasbeen exacerbated by recent developments, including industry shocks, increased feesand charges and creeping regulatory burden• regional airports are essential pieces of transportation infrastructure• other jurisdictions have developed support programs to ensure regional airport viability• issues to be addressed include:• the federal government’s policy framework;• inadequate funding;• airport management/governance practices regarding training and planning;• services by others that airports rely on; and• regional infrastructure issues.Based on the foregoing, the following actions should be taken by the various keystakeholders.5.1 Province of British ColumbiaPolicy framework:• Continue advocacy initiatives for changes to federal policies and practices.There are a number of federal tax, regulatory and policy issues that require change.The Government of B.C. has a great deal of influence federally, and is well positionedto advocate change in support of the airport and aviation industry. The political weightB.C. can add to the industry voice is critical.Funding inadequacy:• Continue or even enhance the Transportation Partnerships Program. Thisprogram, targeted for airports and ports, is a key step forward and provides muchneeded support for strategic initiatives. It should be retained, or if possible, enhancedto ensure critical infrastructure investment can take place.• Create a funding program for small/remote communities not eligible for ACAP.The Ministry of Transportation should create a program to ensure that smaller andparticularly remote communities continue to receive at least a minimum acceptablelevel of scheduled air service. Such a program should include provisions to provide for8 April 2005