11.07.2015 Views

QUANTUM MECHANICS AND NON-ABELIAN THETA FUNCTIONS ...

QUANTUM MECHANICS AND NON-ABELIAN THETA FUNCTIONS ...

QUANTUM MECHANICS AND NON-ABELIAN THETA FUNCTIONS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44RĂZVAN GELCA <strong>AND</strong> ALEJ<strong>AND</strong>RO URIBEProof. Because 2r is an even integer, the group SL θ (2, Z) is the wholeSL(2, Z). By Proposition 3.17 in [13], there is a constant ν(2r,h) suchthatθ τ ′j( zcτ + d)) ∑= ν(2r,h)exp(− 4πircz22(cτ + d)ke iπ2r (cdk2 +2bckj+abj 2) θ τ aj+ck (z)with the same summation convention as in the statement of the theorem,and with τ ′ = aτ+bcτ+d. The mapθ τ j (z) → ∑ ke iπ2r (cdk2 +2bckj+abj 2) θ τ aj+ck (z)is up to multiplication by a constant, the unique map that satisfies theEgorov condition with the representation of the Heisenberg group. It followsthatζ τ j (z) → ∑ ke πi2r (cdk2 +abj 2) [bcjk]ζ τ aj+ck (z)satisfies the Egorov condition with the Weyl quantization of the pillow case.By Theorem 5.2 there is a unique map with this property, up to multiplicationby a constant. Hence the conclusion.□References[1] A.Yu. Alexeev, V. Schomerus, Representation theory of Chern-Simons observables,Duke Math. Journal, 85 (1996), No.2, 447–510.[2] M.F. Atiyah, R. Bott, The Yang-Mills equations over a Riemann surface, Phil.Trans. Royal. Soc. A, 308 (1982), 523–615.[3] D. Bullock, J.H. Przytycki, Multiplicative structure of Kauffman bracket skein modulequantizations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 128 (2000), 923–931.[4] A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, 1994.[5] G. Folland, Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space, Princeton University Press, Princeton1989.[6] Ch. Frohman, R. Gelca, Skein modules and the noncommutative torus, Trans. Amer.Math. Soc., 352 (2000), 4877–4888.[7] R. Gelca, Topological SL(2, C) quantum field theory with corners, J. Knot TheoryRamif., 7(1998), 893–906.[8] R. Gelca, On the holomorphic point of view in the theory of quantum knot invariants,J. Geom. Phys, 56 (2006), 2163–2176.[9] R. Gelca, A. Uribe, The Weyl quantization and the quantum group quantization ofthe moduli space of flat SU(2)-connections on the torus are the same, Commun.Math. Phys., 233(2003), 493–512.[10] W. Goldman, Invariant functions on Lie groups and Hamiltonian flow of surfacegroup representations, Inventiones Math., 85 (1986), 263–302.[11] V.F.R. Jones, Polynomial invariants of knots via von Neumann algebras, Bull. Amer.Math. Soc., 12(1995), 103–111.[12] N. Hitchin, Flat connections and geometric quantization, Commun. Math. Phys.,131 (1990), 347–380.[13] V. Kač, D.H. Peterson, Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, theta functions and modularforms, Adv. in Math., 53 (1984), 125–264.[14] R. Kirby, P. Melvin, The 3-manifold invariants of Witten and Reshetikhin-Turaevfor sl(2, C), Inventiones Math., 105 (1991), 473–545.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!