VOXResearch-based policy analysis <strong>and</strong> commentary from leading economistsEBRD, the European Union <strong>and</strong> a number of national governments <strong>and</strong> government agencies.Since 2005, he is an Advisor to Goldman Sachs International. He has published widelyon subjects such as open economy macroeconomics, monetary <strong>and</strong> exchange rate theory,fiscal policy, social security, economic development <strong>and</strong> transition economies. He is a CEPRResearch Fellow.20
Reforming global economic <strong>and</strong> financialgovernanceRaghuram RajanUniversity of Chicago, ex-Chief Economist of the IMF<strong>G20</strong> leaders should focus on global governance <strong>and</strong> should boost the IMF's financial firepower.Global financial coordination requires a broader group than the G7 or <strong>G20</strong>. The EUshould get only one chair in the ‘<strong>G20</strong>+’ to allow broader representation. The Secretariat forthis group should be a reformed IMF. The IMF's lending capacity should be immediatelyincreased by allowing the Fund to leverage its member quotas at a ratio of between 5 <strong>and</strong> 10to 1.The central problem in fostering global economic dialogue is that it is currently a ‘dialogueof the deaf’.• Industrial countries stopped requiring financing long ago; they now believe theyare responsible global citizens, <strong>and</strong> guard their policy independence carefully. Itseems they view the primary role of multilateral institutions as correcting thepolicy mistakes <strong>and</strong> the naked mercantilism of emerging markets, <strong>and</strong> – ofc<strong>our</strong>se – providing aid to the very poor.• Emerging markets feel they have come of age; they believe multilateralinstitutions follow an agenda set by the industrial countries, <strong>and</strong> don't see whytheir own policies should be under scrutiny when industrial countries showscant regard for the multilateral institutions (other than to enforce theirbidding).• Developing countries, beset with their own problems, have little time or interestin a global agenda.Unfortunately, global problems are mounting, <strong>and</strong> the problems are not just financial.The availability <strong>and</strong> pricing of res<strong>our</strong>ces is, as we have realised in recent years, ofcritical importance. Ideally, such res<strong>our</strong>ces would be produced <strong>and</strong> allocated by a freemarket to which everyone has access. Unfortunately government action distorts themarket. Decisions by small groups of countries on issues ranging from promoting biofuelsto restricting investment in, or production of, oil, have enormous impact. Asother countries try <strong>and</strong> adopt strategies that shield themselves from res<strong>our</strong>ce shocks,everyone's access to res<strong>our</strong>ces is impaired. Dialogue can help us reach a better globalsolution.Similarly, even though the world may have learnt the dangers of beggar-thy-neighb<strong>our</strong>strategies in trade, echoes are still seen in cross-border investment. More barriersare being contemplated in industrial countries to investment from emerging markets.Old barriers, under the guise of promoting domestic stability <strong>and</strong> security, alsoexist -- all this while emerging markets have historically been exhorted to reduce theirbarriers to investment, <strong>and</strong> in some cases are doing so. It is important that we start aglobal dialogue on the admissible rules of the game in cross-border investment.Finally, global financial integration, while helpful, has increased the size of the21