flag. He just stood there with his nonstop smile.SOMETHING“What’s the Windex for?” one of my friends asked, “I can’t imagine you guys domuch cleaning.” She was referring to a bottle of glass cleaner that wasstrangely intermixed on the table with vodka, fruit juice, and DVDs of theClash and Alan Partridge. I had to agree, the place didn’t seem like it wascleaned regularly. It wasn’t awfully dirty or disgusting. It just had thisreally simplistic vibe - dark panel walls, and ‘80s dark green and burgundydécor. A small CD player, similar to those that plug into a cigarette lighter,served as the source for the bus sound system. “It’s for cuts and bruisesand things like that,” Muncey replied to the Windex question.CORPORAORPORATEWe discussed music, touring and books. I must admit, maybe it was theshaggy ‘70s hairstyles, but it felt like we were hanging with a true rock’n’rollband, instead of the typical rock-rap pretty boys inundating mass radio andvideo. These guys with their vintage garb and faraway accents reeked ofrock spirit, or at least a strong respect for it.I decided to grab a beer (which had a music note design on the lid) andperuse the band’s album of CD’s to select some tunes. Just as I imagined,the collection was stockpiled with timeless classics (i.e. the Beatles, theStones, the Who) and a lot of newer Euro bands. I went with Oasis(What’s The Story) Morning Glory. “Great choice,” Muncey praised.My friends continued with their banter and questions for Muncey. “Areyou married? Why are you wearing a wedding ring on your right hand?”He explained that his father died when he was younger, and he likes towear his ring. “I don’t like telling people that,” he said. “It makes them feelsad or uncomfortable when I have to answer.” My friend explained thather mom died, and she does the same thing. “Maybe my dad and your momare fucking in heaven,” he said with a laugh, “That is … if she’s hot.” Myfriend found Muncey’s remarks amusing, and the two did a sort of “cheers,”YELLOWCARDclicking their parents’ wedding rings together. About then, Cester emergedfrom the sleeping cubbies, looking red-eyed and totally disheveled. “Doesanyone have a cigarette?” He moaned, seemingly in dyer need. No onehad one. He stumbled into the bathroom, and then back to bed.ARDIt was close to 2 a.m. and the Jet tour bus was leaving town in half an hour.Muncey gave us parting gifts of Red Bull. (Being the hospitable host, heinsisted that we take the entire case of Red Bull.) Muncey proved to be amost outgoing, carefree spirit with a - dare I say - innocent kindness andendearing character.From this experience, it’s accurate to say these guys from Down Underknow how to rock the stage and the party. And if Jet is the band that musicmedia is labeling as “rock’s revival,” I’d say we can be confident with thattheory. Should you get the opportunity to see Jet perform or hang with theband – you will feel a refreshing rock’n’roll energy that’s missing from a lotof today’s radio world. Oh yea, and be sure to bring cigarettes. I canassure you it’s an instant way to win over Chris Cester, who’s probablyLESS THAN JAKEcraving one right now.
By: Crystal ClarkCOLD MOUNTAINNicole Kidman, Jude Law, Renee ZellwegerDirected by: Anthony MinghellaMiramax, R, 155 minWhether or not you’ve read the bestseller by Charles Frazier, one thing is forcertain as you walk into the theater: the Anthony Minghella-directed Cold Mountainis going to look absolutely amazing, and it does. Minghella, a graduate ofThe English Patient and The Talented Mr. Ripley, has a cinematic gift so innatethat it’s emotionally mind-blowing, and his penchant for visual storytelling isbreathtaking. The rumors are true, Cold Mountain is one of the best movies to bereleased this year; therefore its destiny to invade the Oscars seems par for thecourse. As expected, Jude Law’s Inman is phenomenal in every inch of hisbeing and Renee Zellweger as Ruby is a spitfire to be reckoned with. And whileI’m walking down the path of obvious, a nomination for Kidman would notsurprise me, though most of me feels that it should be someone else’s turn inthe spotlight. Year-after-year, there are so many brilliant performances embeddedon film that ultimately find themselves over-looked in a shallow search ofmarquee names and studios. This is not to discount Kidman’s presentation ofAda in this epic tale of love and commitment, but sometimes entertainers needto go away for awhile in order for us to appreciate them and their artistic craft.Then again, maybe I’m still just pissed-off that Kidman won the Oscar for herwork in The Hours over the more deserving Zellweger in Chicago. Regardless,I’m on Kidman overload and I need a break, but that seems unlikely because shehas not one, but six more movies lined up for release. Which makes me wonder, if I’m this sick of seeing her everywhere I turn,I can’t imagine what Tom Cruise has been going through. It’s no wonder he went to Japan for two years; at the rate Kidman’scareer is going, it looks like I just might be headed that way myself. With my luck, she’ll probably be there filming on location.LORD OF THE RINGS:THE RETURN OF THE KINGElijah Wood, Sean Astin, Ian McKellenDirected by: Peter JacksonNew Line Cinema, PG-13, 2<strong>01</strong> minBy now, everyone in the world has read, heard, or spoken the perenniallexicons that have become synonymous with the cinematic trilogy known asThe Lord of the Rings: epic, masterpiece, classic, magnificent, stunning, breathtaking,monumental, adventure, visionary, greatness, spectacle, achievement,vast, immense, fairytale, fantasy, storybook, saga, journey, legendary... Infact, I’ve just checked my thesaurus and noted that there are approximatelysixty-five more words that I could have chosen to print that would have essentiallydescribed The Return of the King, and for that matter, the entire 631-minute marathon of The Lord of the Rings. But to be totally honest, I don’t reallycare for any of these words right here, right now. Yes, the words themselvesare lucid, staggering illustrations of how truly beautiful grammar can be andhow essential it is to move people with whimsical words of wisdom. And aquick thumb-through my last ten years of tear sheets exemplifies that not onlydo I admire these words, but I’ve also used every single one of them in print.But not here, not now, and not ever to describe the Lord of the Rings trilogy.There are no words that exist that could capture the essence of its greatness.I mean, his greatness: Mr. Peter Jackson. After the J. R. R. Tolkien / Jacksontrilogy came to an end with the release of part three: The Return of the King, I among others, walked out of the theatre speechless;quite in just the same manor as I did last year after viewing, The Two Towers, and the year before after witnessing the one thatstarted it all, The Fellowship of the Ring. Mere logistics prevented me from reviewing part one and two of this unprecedentedcinematic undertaking, but in hindsight, I’m relieved that I was never available to document my feelings regarding “the precious,”because that would have required me to define the who, what, where, how, and why of this sheer piece of art that is far betterand beyond anything our imaginations could have ever conjured up on our own. Amount that New Line Cinema boldly invested intomaking The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King: 300 million dollars. Global profit made by thestudio from the first two movies as of Dec 2003: 1.6 billion dollars. Estimated profit to be generated by the third installment alone:1 billion dollars. Acknowledging the sheer fact that we not only got our money’s worth, but also experienced the best cinematictrilogy ever created: priceless.<strong>RAG</strong> MAGAZINE • JANUARY 20<strong>04</strong> • 39