ProfessionalDevelopmentNRA Rolls Out New ProfessionalDevelopment Seminar SeriesCAPT Larry Weill, USNNational VP for Professional DevelopmentThe start of the comingyear brings with it a newand exciting revision andupgrade to the standardProfessional Developmentseminar program. Thisprogram has been revamped over thepast year in an effort to keep up withcurrent changes in naval careers as wellas to anticipate the future needs of ourofficers and enlisted personnel.Before we get started discussing thistopic, I’m sure that a lot of eyebrowswere just raised when we mentionedenlisted PD (professional development).However, this is just one example of thenew directions we found ourselvesmoving. As an organization that supportsall members of the Navy <strong>Reserve</strong>, notjust the officer corps, we must beresponsible for providing a top-shelfproduct that will assist and advise ourenlisted members on their own careerdecisions. We are assembling a cadre ofexperts from the senior-most echelonsof our enlisted leadership to bring thisprogram to fruition within the next year.Many of our members who haveattended the NRA professional developmentseminars in past years have asked us,“Just what is it you want to change?”Our answer, basically, is EVERYTHING.No, we aren’t necessarily getting rid ofanything that is important, and we aren’tgoing to skip over critical informationjust because it’s been covered before.However, we are going to place a greateremphasis on some of the emerging areasof focus that will play a greater role inthe future. This will include expandedsections on professional education(including JPME), leadership training,APPLY strategies, and individual designatorgroup mentoring (with a focus on juniorofficers).One feature that most people willnotice immediately is that the seminars haveincreased in length. The new program, inits full format, is now six hours insteadof four. It is a fast-paced, fact-filledprogram that is truly fed through a firehose. (Expecting a traditional “lunchhour”? Forget about it! But we’ll try toarrange sandwiches to eat while youlearn.)The agenda starts with a few briefopening remarks, followed by a brief onleadership and the Center for <strong>Naval</strong>Leadership. This is an exciting look atthe programs that are coming our way asa force-wide leadership tool for all officers,regardless of status. Leadership is partand parcel of what we do, and this briefis a look into where we are going withthis program.Next on tap is a look into JPME (JointProfessional Military Leadership) andthe view “around the corner” into thefuture. We are constantly developing newresources and programs to offer JPMEto our officers stationed around theglobe, and this brief provides theanswers you’ll need to get that training.It also looks at new opportunities forgetting into the Advanced JPME program,which will become more important toyour career with each passing year. Getthe info now so you’ll be prepared totake advantage of these opportunities asthey arise.Some of the other topics listed, suchas Selection Board Preparations andFitness Reports, have appeared on previousPD seminars in the past. However, if youthink that this is just a rehash of lastyear’s program, guess again. Our BoardPreps and Simulated Selection Boardare a whole new “dark tank” experience,where we turn out the lights, splashservice records across the screens, andhand YOU the laser pointers! You’llparticipate right alongside our expertpanelists, listening to briefers discussthe merits of each record, and then gradingthe record. (Yup – that means YOU! Youwill vote on each record, and you willlearn exactly what it is that the selectionboard looks for as it makes its choices ofpromotees.)The final section of the new seminarleaves plenty of time for designatorspecificmentoring, where each officerwill pair up with senior experts withinhis/her field and review the merits of his/herindividual records. In order to maximizethe benefit from this session, you shouldbring along your most recent OSR/PSRand be prepared to discuss it with abona fide Navy mentor. It is an excellentopportunity to network with a genuineauthority who has “been there and donethat” and knows how to get advanced.The first of these new programs isbeing scheduled for Kansas City onSaturday, 17 November. We will soonbegin advertising for this program andhope to sign up a healthy contingent ofattendees. Please try to make it there ifyou are in the area. We are also lookingat potential sites including Dallas/FortWorth and Great Lakes, among otherareas of fleet concentration. A schedulewill be advertised soon, so please staytuned.Thanks again for all your input on PDprograms, because your feedback hasbeen a major catalyst towards ourefforts to upgrade this agenda. We lookforward to seeing you in Kansas Cityon 17 November!12 NRA NEWS/SEPTEMBER 2007
Letters-to-the-editor reflect the opinions of their writers only. Neither the officersnor the staff of the <strong>Naval</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Association</strong> endorse the viewpoints expressed here.The editor of NRA News reserves the right to publish only those letters that appeal toa broad readership and to edit any letter for length, grammar, and clarity.Dear Admiral Coane,My article in the July 2005 edition of the NRANews titled, Name Change from <strong>Naval</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>to Navy <strong>Reserve</strong> – Why and what next is comingto fruition? I stated that Congress has fundedpersonnel, equipment, and material to supportthe part-time “citizen Sailor.” Name change willallow regular Navy to easily appropriate moreequipment/material specifically bought for theNavy <strong>Reserve</strong> out of Congressionally mandatedfunds with specific language for Navy <strong>Reserve</strong>use, or with Guard and <strong>Reserve</strong> funds. Otherrecent comments from Navy Reservists include“Navy is in the process of covering recruitingshortfalls by calling up Navy <strong>Reserve</strong> personnelto plug into gaps without necessarily using orutilizing their expertise. I cannot think of a fasterway to induce people to leave the reserve as soonas they can.” “. . . there is resistance by corporateAmerica in the way their employees are nowbeing used by DoD.” “Having personnel withoutairplanes is unworkable. Pilots join up to fly.When that slows to a trickle, they will not be ableto justify the family sacrifices required for<strong>Reserve</strong> participation.” “Navy officials say thedecommissioning is part of an effort to shift<strong>Reserve</strong> aviation away from hardware basedunits into pools of pilots and flight officers whowill augment active duty squadrons. The Navyofficials may call it ‘transformation,’ I call it adamn shame and penny-wise and poundfoolish!”Because we had to change, Navy seizedthe opportunity to solve its 34-year old insolubletotal force dilemma, by denuding the Navy<strong>Reserve</strong>, swallowing it (integration) and liquidatingit, leaving it a manpower pool, and saving moneyto boot. I have talked to untold number of activeduty support personnel, they are officiallymuzzled, but most are not only dissatisfied,but also disgusted with the Navy <strong>Reserve</strong>reorganization, including lack of support, otherthan verbal, by many senior regular Navy officers.Several reorganizations of the <strong>Naval</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>have taken place over the years. This one hasbeen drastic and appears to have lackedCongressional oversight. With most of theRumsfeld/Clark regime gone, it is time toregroup and reorganize into a true “CitizenSailor” concept rather than having a USNaugmentee program. Otherwise, I believe the<strong>Reserve</strong> will be composed of USN RADsfulfilling their obligated service and thosededicated Navy Reservists sticking it out onlyfor retirement benefits. I predict within five years,the American public will not have a Navy <strong>Reserve</strong>unless there is a drastic change of direction. It istime for all dedicated Navy Reservists to becomeless complacent and write your Congressman tohelp get the Navy <strong>Reserve</strong> program back ontrack.Dear Admiral Coane:Doyle QuisenberryCommander, USNR (Ret)Earlier this year, I resigned my commissionwith great regret after 15 years of service withthe Army and the Navy. The Navy’s “operationalreserve” is not compatible with the practice ofmedicine. The routine mobilization, (i.e., backdoordraft) of one-year every five will prove tobe the “kiss of death” for the already depletedMedical Corps of the Navy <strong>Reserve</strong>.I would like to express my gratitude to the<strong>Naval</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Association</strong> for the tremendoussupport it provides to Reservists. The recordreviews, personal recognition, and timelyinformation updates are several examples of howthe NRA has made a difference for the citizensailor.The NRA and its dedicated staff are a realasset to the Navy and the Nation. Thank you!Dear NRA,William V. Dolan, MDThank you, NRA, for giving me an opportunityand opening my eyes to your efforts!While it may seem like a Herculean taskpushing legislation through Congress, the factthat the <strong>Naval</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Association</strong> has a strongadvocate makes me proud to be a member. I onlywish more Navy Reservists were aware of yourefforts.I’ll admit, I was once apathetic to the wholelegislative process – it’s easy to get discouraged.As a senior civilian federal government employeeand a Navy Reservist, I understand how hard it isto get things done in Washington. Currently, I ama GS-14 Management Analyst in the Departmentof Treasury. My education was completelyfunded through the MGIB and any effort toLettersNRA News 07bring it in line with the Active Duty component,I fully support – especially since I have beenmobilized in support of the GWOT.Currently, I am seeking a commission througheither the DCO or LDO program.Dear Captain Labhard,Petty Officer First Class QuintoI read your article on osteoporosis––but I don’tremember it saying anything on complicationsfollowing tooth extraction. There have beeninstances of some women not healing followingtooth extractions, that were on the medication forosteoporosis. Do you have any information onthis? Can the patient be off the meds for aperiod of time to reduce this complication?(CAPT Labhard’s response)Dear Captain Bridgeman,H. E. BridgemanCaptain, DC, USNR (Ret)Had read a lot about delayed healing of somedeep dental surgeries while researching thearticle on osteoporosis. In fact, I stoppedtaking my own Fosamax—it was mostlyprophylactic at this point. Please check thereferences listed in the article as well as the ADAper this quote from the Senior Dental Executiveat our Gaining Command:“Yes, I am quite familiar with this topic. Therehave been several instances of Osteonecrosis ofthe jaw associated with tooth extraction inpatients undergoing therapy for osteoporosis.A majority of these cases involve IV therapyin cancer patients, but recently some casesinvolving oral medications have been noted.The recommendation to minimize the risk ofthis complication is a work in progress. I woulddirect this provider to the ADA Web site whichhas a lot of information on the subject.”I also checked with my endodontist . . . hebasically agreed that there is still a lot of researchbeing done to prove this, but it takes so long toget Fosamax out of your system that to stop takingit would probably have little effect on the outcome—thisis not a quote, but what I remember.Hope this information will be helpful.Susan LabhardCaptain, NC, USNNRA NEWS/SEPTEMBER 2007 13