11.07.2015 Views

McIntosh C1000 Stereophile Review - The Listening Post

McIntosh C1000 Stereophile Review - The Listening Post

McIntosh C1000 Stereophile Review - The Listening Post

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MCINTOSH <strong>C1000</strong>with tubed gear, while the tubed<strong>C1000</strong>T produced the even-handedtonal balance and neutrality one usuallyassociates with solid-state. While therewere sonic differences to be heard runningthe Musical Fidelity kW SACDplayer through each preamp, the differenceswere minor: a bit more bloom,and slightly softer, riper bass in the caseof the <strong>C1000</strong>T. But the kW has its ownsolid-state and tubed outputs. By switchingthose around, I could achieve thesame sound using either <strong>McIntosh</strong> preamp.<strong>The</strong> kW’s solid-state output intothe tubed <strong>C1000</strong>T sounded very similarto the kW’s tubed output into the solidstate<strong>C1000</strong>P. Running the tubed kWinto the tubed <strong>McIntosh</strong> producedmore warmth and bloom than I like,but your taste may differ.Run through either pair ofmonoblocks, both the solid-state andtubed preamps sounded intoxicatinglyliquid, with astonishing purity, delicacy,and transparency. While few good preampsin my experience present electronic“noise” as audible noise, the differencebetween the quietness of most preampsof my experience and the quietness ofthe <strong>C1000</strong> was easy to hear—or, rather,not hear. I could sense the <strong>C1000</strong>’s definitionof quietness in the elegance ofdecays, the roundness and three-dimensionalityof images, and, especially, in theutter ease of the overall sound.<strong>The</strong> <strong>C1000</strong>’s overall freedom frommechanical artifacts, particularly onsibilants and transients, helped producean entirely effortless sonic picture, yetwith either preamp, the sound wasnever too soft or warm. While the<strong>C1000</strong>’s ultralow noise floor producedmesmerizing, delicate microdynamicdetails, occasionally I felt that largescaledynamic swings were not quite asthunderous and powerful as they canbe—but once I’d gotten acclimated tothe <strong>C1000</strong>’s unusual ease and transparency,that proved to be an illusion.While in Texas recently to hearAndrew Litton and the Dallas Symphonyperform Mahler’s Symphony 2, Ipicked up a superb-sounding DelosCD of Litton and the DSO in the samework, recorded by John Eargle in thesame hall in which the concert tookplace: the gorgeous-sounding EugeneMcDermott Concert Hall of the MortonH. Meyerson Symphony Center.This warm, intimate, coherent-soundinghall has ideal reverberant decay andamong the best propagations of stringand bass sound I’ve ever heard live. <strong>The</strong>construction of the stage included acarefully designed hollow under thecello section to allow their sound to“breathe” with full expression. Myhosts had told me that some listenersare skeptical of the hollow’s success, butas the lower string players drew theirbows across the strings, I found theoverall richness, warmth, and texturalexpression almost overwhelming. Ironic,I thought, that this tubey-soundingspace was funded by one of the threefounders of semiconductor makerTexas Instruments, while the cold, sterile,analytical Avery Fisher Hall wasendowed by a man who made his fortuneproducing tubed electronics.<strong>The</strong> tubed CD-player output intothe <strong>C1000</strong>P solid-state preamp or thesolid-state CD-player output into the<strong>C1000</strong>T tubed preamp came closest toduplicating the sound I heard at eitherof the seats I occupied in McDermottHall (10th row center for the first half,dead center in the loge box for the secondhalf). When I ran the MusicalFidelity kW’s solid-state output intothe solid-state <strong>C1000</strong>P, the sound wasstill impressive, but some of the richnessI’d heard live was lost.<strong>McIntosh</strong> claims 130dB of channelseparation for this dual-mono, mirrorimagedesign. Judging by the spaciousnessof the sound, I’m sure JohnAtkinson’s measurements will back upthat claim.measurements, continued(fig.11), though at –88dB (0.006%) this won’t bother anyhuman listener. Intermodulation distortion was alsoessentially nonexistent at normal levels; I had to brutalizethe preamps by driving them close to clipping into 600ohms to get any significant evidence of high-order products(fig.12), and even then, the distortion productsremained at or below 80dB (0.01%)!<strong>The</strong> measured performance of these two <strong>McIntosh</strong> preamplifiersreveals some superb audio engineering, withno compromise evident for the tubed version apart fromsome slightly higher but still low noise levels and thatultrasonic RIAA error. It is very satisfying to measure suchproducts, and, as Mikey found, equally satisfying to listento them.—John AtkinsonFig.11 <strong>McIntosh</strong> <strong>C1000</strong>P, balanced spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz,at 10V into 600 ohms (linear frequency scale).Fig.12 <strong>McIntosh</strong> <strong>C1000</strong>P, balanced HF intermodulation spectrum,DC–24kHz, 19+20kHz at 15V peak into 600 ohms (linear frequencyscale).www.<strong>Stereophile</strong>.com, August 2006 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!