Electronic <strong>Medical</strong> Record and Quality ofPatient Care In the <strong>VA</strong>I was working at the <strong>Providence</strong> <strong>VA</strong><strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Center</strong> emergency room when Iwas asked to see a new, confused, diabeticpatient, who was visiting her family in<strong>Providence</strong>. <strong>The</strong> nurse informed me thather blood sugar was low. We took measuresto correct her blood sugar immediately.<strong>The</strong> patient was not clear regardingher medications. Her primary care physicianwas at a <strong>VA</strong> hospital in California.Logging into the <strong>VA</strong> Computerized PatientRecord System (CPRS), I gainedaccess to the patient’s recent outpatientoffice visit notes, and obtained the mostcurrent medication list. It became clearthat the patient was not taking her diabeticmedications as prescribed and thatshe was hypoglycemic because of overmedication.Via the electronic medicalrecord, <strong>VA</strong> physicians can ascertain notonly the patient’s latest data, but also a completemedical record going back as far asthe mid -1980s, including records of careperformed in any other Veterans HealthAdministration (VHA ) hospital or clinic.More than $ 1.2 trillion spent onhealth care each year is estimated to bewasted—about half the $2.2 trillionspent in the United States on health careeach year, according to the most recentdata from Price Waterhouse CooperHealth Research Institute. 1 Much of thewaste is a result of disorganization andlack of accurate information. This resultsin orders for unneeded tests and ineffectiveprocedures and in simple human error.Advanced health information technologycan reduce these consequencessubstantially in the following ways: 21. Improved communication2. More readily accessible knowledge3. Assistance with calculations4. Performance of checks in realtime5. Assistance with monitoring6. Decision support7. Requirement for key pieces ofinformation (dose, e.g.)Tanya Ali, MDBased on a well-specified definitionof electronic health records, only 17% ofUS physicians used either a minimallyfunctional or a comprehensive electronicrecords system in 2009. 3 Twenty fourfunctionalities have been identified as theessential components of comprehensiveelectronic records system. 4In 1995 the <strong>VA</strong> launched a major reengineeringof its health care system thatincluded better use of information technology,measurement and reporting of performance,integration of services, and realignedpayment policies. Health Informationtechnology benefited from significant investments6 and the CPRS was implementednationally throughout the VHA in 1999. 7,8In any <strong>VA</strong> hospital clinicians cannavigate the electronic medical recordsby logging into CPRS. Via a graphicaluser interface, physicians can access completepatient records from inpatient visits,subspecialty consults, primary carevisits, emergency room visits, laboratorydata, radiology reports, medication history,surgical notes and discharge summaries.All physicians’ work on any patientutilizes the same medical record andall entries are legible. This facilitates communicationamong care providers, makesthe data collection process efficient, savestime, and eliminates difficulty decipheringillegible handwriting.<strong>The</strong> Clinical Decision Support(CDS) component of CPRS providesclinical data, clinical guidelines, clinicalreminders, situation-specific advice, andmakes relevant information available inTable 1. Electronic Functionalities of ComprehensiveElectronic Records System 3Electronic FunctionalityClinical documentation• Demographic characteristics of patients• Physician’s notes• Nursing assessments• Problem lists• Medication lists• Discharge summaries• Advanced directivesTest and imaging results• Laboratory reports• Radiologic reports• Radiologic images• Diagnostic – test results• Diagnostic – test images• Consultant reportsComputerized provider-order entry• Laboratory tests• Radiologic tests• Medications• Consultation requests• Nursing ordersDecision support• Clinical guidelines• Clinical reminders• Drug-allergy alerts• Drug-drug interaction alerts• Drug-laboratory interaction alerts• Drug-dose support (renal dose guidance)8MEDICINE & HEALTH/RHODE ISLAND
eal time to facilitate clinical decisionmaking. Availability of these componentsmakes information collection a smoothprocess, provides decision support automaticallyas part of workflow and providesactionable recommendations. 9CDS reminds the clinician to evaluate fordifferent JCAHO-required indicatorssuch as pain scale, signs of abuse, safetyin the living place, counseling for smokingcessation, assessment for pressure ulcers,medicine reconciliation, and verificationof advance directives. <strong>The</strong> sameCDS system reminds doctors to prescribeappropriate care for patients when theyleave the hospital, such as prescriptionof beta blockers after heart attacks, ACEinhibitors for congestive heart failure, leftventricular function assessment byechocardiogram for heart failure, anticoagulationin patients with atrial fibrillation,and daily weight measurement inpatients with congestive heart failure.All patient care orders are enteredinto CPRS through a ComputerizedPhysician Order Entry (CPOE) system.All inpatient orders (for diet, activity, intravenousfluid, medication, lab, radiology,consultations, etc) and outpatientorders are entered through this system.<strong>The</strong> CPRS has an active clinical decisionsupport system focused on drugs,laboratory testing and radiology procedures.For example, when a physicianenters a new medication order in CPRS,the system immediately alerts the physicianto any previous allergic reaction tothe same medication and to any relevantdrug-drug interactions. CPRS checks forduplicate therapy, provides basic drugdosing guidance, and makes formularydata available. It also checks dosing forrenal insufficiency and geriatric patients,medication-related lab testing (e.g. PT,PTT before intravenous heparin initiation),and drug-pregnancy and drug-diseasecontraindications. <strong>The</strong> laboratorygenerates view alerts to the provider onany abnormal testing results through theCPRS. For example, orders for CT scanwith contrast generate alerts to the providerif the patient is on metformin, ifserum creatinine is abnormal, or if a recentserum creatinine is not available inorder to caution the provider regardingpotential contrast-related complications.<strong>The</strong> radiologist can generate a computerizedalert to primary care providers (inpatientand outpatient) whenever an abnormalradiology image is reviewed.Computerized Clinical Reminders(CCR) are just-in-time reminders at thepoint of care that reflect evidence – basedclinical practice guidelines and reducereliance on memory. This system keepstrack of when veterans are due for a flushot, pneumococcal vaccine, diabetic eyeexam, diabetic foot exam, lipid profile,screening colonoscopy, breast cancerscreen, or other screening and generatesa computerized reminder to the providerat the time of the patient visit.<strong>The</strong> electronicmedical record hasstrongly supportedperformanceimprovementthroughoutthe VHA.When the quality of care in the VeteransHealth Administration (VHA)health care system was assessed from1994 (before re-engineering) through2000, it was found that quality of careimproved dramatically in all domainsstudied. <strong>The</strong>se improvements were evidentfrom 1997 through fiscal year2000. 5 Compared with Medicare fee –for –service programs, the <strong>VA</strong> performedsignificantly better on all eleven similarhealth quality indicators for the periodfrom 1997 through 1999. In 2000 the<strong>VA</strong> out-performed Medicare on 12 of 13indicators. 5 <strong>The</strong> <strong>VA</strong> also out-performedother health systems in the communityon standardized measures of health carequality. Performance in the VHA outpacedthat of a national sample for bothchronic care and preventive care. In particular,the VHA sample received significantlybetter care for depression, diabetes,hyperlipidemia and hypertension. 10<strong>The</strong> electronic medical record hasstrongly supported performance improvementthroughout the VHA. <strong>The</strong>VHA instituted a performance measurementinitiative nationally in 1996. As apart of this initiative, evidence - basedclinical performance measures were identifiedand performance on these measureswas ascertained via an External Peer ReviewProgram (EPRP). In EPRP, a non–VHA contractor abstracts records of asample of VHA patients from each VHAfacility, derived from electronic healthrecords. 11 <strong>The</strong>se measures are incorporatedinto an annual performance contract,and senior managers are held accountableto meet or to exceed specificperformance targets. 12 This VHA performancemeasurement initiative hasbeen enhanced by the comprehensiveelectronic medical record system that facilitatedthe use of electronic decisionsupport such as clinical reminders. 13 <strong>The</strong>use of these reminders is at the discretionof the local facilities. <strong>The</strong> search forstrategies contributing to high clinicalperformance measures throughout theVHA showed that the second most commonlycited strategies across all performancecategories were clinical reminders(41.4%). 13 <strong>The</strong> computerized clinicalreminders 7,14- 22 and computer basedstanding orders 18, 23, 24 are proven interventionsto enhance preventive care (e.g.immunizations, cancer screening).<strong>The</strong> significant improvement in thehealth care provided by VHA wasachieved by transformation into a culturebased on accountability for continuousimprovement of performance. 6 <strong>The</strong> <strong>VA</strong>’ssuperior quality relative to that of Medicarefor the period from 1997 through2000 probably has more to do with thequality—improvement initiatives thatwere instituted in the mid-1990s thanwith structural differences. 5In conclusion, the re-engineering ofthe VHA has resulted in dramatic improvementsin the quality of care providedto veterans. In fact, the Institute of Medicinerecently recommended many of theprinciples adopted by the <strong>VA</strong> in its qualityimprovement projects, including emphasison the use of information technologyand performance measurement andreporting. 25REFERENCES1. http://money.cnn.com/2009/08/10/news/economy/healthcare_money_wasters/index.htm2. www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/.../valenta-031808.ppt3. Jha AK, DesRoches C, et al. NEJM 2009;360:1628-38.4. Blumenthal D, DesRoches C, et al. Health informationTechnology in the United States: <strong>The</strong> InformationBase for Progress. Princeton, NJ: RobertWood Johnson Foundation 2006.VOLUME 93 NO. 1 JANUARY 20109