Alaknanda Hydro Power Co. Ltd. Vs. Anuj Joshi & Ors. - STPL india

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2013 STPL(Web) 626 SC 14Alaknanda Hydro Power Co. Ltd. Vs. Anuj Joshi & Ors.Hydro mechanical works: dam and spillway, head race tunnel, forebay and byepass anddraft tube are 100% completed.Electro-mechanical works: 3 units are 100% completed whereas unit 4 is under progress.6.TORIII: In the context of Dhari Devi Temple, which is coming under submergence of thereservoir, the Committee will suggest best possible option regarding how to protect the DhariDevi Temple without disturbance at its present location.In the recent time there have been several committees who have gone through the issue ofthe submergence of Dhari Devi temple and a numbers of alternative to prevent thesubmergence of the Dhari Devi Temple were studied. These are as follows:(a) Architectural Heritage Division of Indian National Trust for Art and CulturalHeritage (INTACH) has prepared a plan in consultation with Dhari Devi TempleTrust, Geological survey of India and AHPCL in Sept 2011.(b) Dr. B.P. Das Committee Aug 2012 recommended that “In view of thecompelling Technical, Social, Religious and Sentimental Reasons narrated inpara 4.2, the feasibility of constructing a dry well structure to protect the rockmound in situ and “Maa Dhari Devi Idol” in its existing position is not feasible.The team therefore recommends for continuation of works of restoration of thetemple as per INTACH proposal”.(c) B.K. Chaturvedi Inter Ministerial Group (IMG) appointed sequel to the thirdmeeting of National Ganga River Basin Authority (NGRBA) in April 2012submitted its report in Sept 2012 where the IMG has recommended that bestsolution for saving the temple appears to be accepting the recommendation oftwo member committee comprising of Chairman Central Water Commission andChairman Central Electricity Authority represented by its Member (Hydro). Thetwo member committee examined the following option:(i) Construction of an enclosure bund around temple and surroundingghat and access road upto the level of 611m on the banks.(ii) Construction of an concrete well of about 30 meter diameter and 18meter height around the temple.(iii) Relocation of the temple to a safe location on the left bank of theriver.(iv) Raising the temple above the highest flood level at its currentlocation and to install the idol at higher elevation at the same spot withaccess to the temple through a pedestrian bridge from the left bank.(v) Construction of 30km long power channel and diversion dam in theupstream of existing dam.Keeping in view the limitations and infeasibility of implementing the first three optionsthe committee recommended the fourth option i.e. “Raising the temple above the highestSupreme Court Judgements @ www.stpl-india.in
2013 STPL(Web) 626 SC 15Alaknanda Hydro Power Co. Ltd. Vs. Anuj Joshi & Ors.flood level at its current location and to install the idol at higher elevation at the samespot with access to the temple through a pedestrian bridge from the left bank.”This committee visited the Dhari Devi temple on May 02, 2012 and interacted withtrustees, priests of the Dhari Devi temple and few residents of village Dhari who were Infavour of raising the temple above the highest water level. In fact the committee observedthat the elevated platform of temple is in advance stage of construction and thepreparations are under way for shifting the deities to the elevated location. The trustee,priests and resident who the committee interacted are of the opinion of early completionof the temple at the elevated location.Dr. B. Jhunjhunwala expressed apprehensions against moving the Dhari Devi temple to ahigher elevation, as it is against the “Rights of Worship”. He proposed the option ofConstruction of 30 km long power channel and diversion dam in the upstream of existingdam.7. TOR IV: The committee will gather evidence through photography/videographyThe photographs taken during site visit are available at annexure – 58. TOR V: The Committee will give personal hearing to Shri Bharat Jhunjhunwala accompaniedby his wife & representatives of the project proponent i.e. AHPCL who will place their views andrecords if any, before the said Committee.The committee gave personal hearing to Shri Bharat Jhunjhunwala accompanied by hiswife as well as project proponent (AHEC) on May 01, 2013 and heard patiently. Thepoints raised by Shri Bharat Jhunjhunwala are addressed as below:a. Sale of power outside the area The project clearances were accorded in theyear 1985 and 1987 during the period of undivided Uttar Pradesh. The powerpurchase agreement of the project is with Uttar Pradesh Govt. utility and freepower @ 12% of power generated shall be available to Uttarakhand Governmentand is in line with the Uttar Pradesh state re-organization Act 2000.b. Conditions attached to Environmental Clearance 1985 Not in the purview ofthe committee. He may request to the MoEF for the safe.c. CAT Plan The status on the CAT plan has been given above under the EC andFC clearance.d. Compensatory afforestation The status on the afforestation has been givenabove under the FC clearance.e. Green Belt The status on the green belt has been given above under the EC andFC clearance.f. Geo morphological studies The status on these studies and resettlement of thelikely to be affected persons has been given above.g. Dhari Devi Temple The response is given under TOR 3Supreme Court Judgements @ www.stpl-india.in
Page 1 and 2: 2013 STPL(Web) 626 SC 1Alaknanda Hy
Page 3: 2013 STPL(Web) 626 SC 3Alaknanda Hy
Page 10 and 11: 2013 STPL(Web) 626 SC 10Alaknanda H

Alaknanda Hydro Power Co. Ltd. Vs. Anuj Joshi & Ors. - STPL india

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?