11.07.2015 Views

CWN-EN-Stormwater-Report-FINAL

CWN-EN-Stormwater-Report-FINAL

CWN-EN-Stormwater-Report-FINAL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INNOVATIVE STORMWATER MANAGEM<strong>EN</strong>T: TRANSLATING SCI<strong>EN</strong>CE INTO ACTIONSHans Schreier, Faculty of Land & Food Systems, University of British ColumbiaTHE NEED FOR INNOVATIONSAs part of the Canadian Water Network (<strong>CWN</strong>) researchinitiative a number of workshops were held in Vancouver,Calgary and Toronto to discuss the current problems inurban stormwater management, and to learn from casestudies how the increasing flood risks can be reduced, andhow best to address the non-point sources of pollution.Based on this cross-city experience it became evident that anumber of new initiatives are under way to radically changethe way we manage urban stormwater. Three key issuesemerged from these workshops:1. How effective are many of the new innovations andis there enough scientific evidence to show that theinnovative approaches are more effective than thetraditional measures;2. How can these innovations be incorporated intomainstream urban development to reduce the risk offlooding and contamination; and3. What are the most appropriate combinations ofinnovative approaches that work at all scales of watershedmanagement and different environmental settings?A wide range of innovative measures were identified andexamined and it became clear that not all of the proposedinnovative solutions are appropriate in all cities becauseeach urban watershed differs in geology, surface conditions,climate and land use. To document the effectiveness ofsome of the proposed innovative measures a numberof research projects were initiated with <strong>CWN</strong> support toaddress the above mentioned issues. We are now confidentthat many of the proposed changes are effective not onlyfrom the environmental point of view but also in terms ofcosts, particularly if they are introduced into new expandingurban areas. A major effort is now needed to promote theseinnovations so that they can become the main adaptivemeasures taken to cope with the increased risk of floodingand stream contamination.THE NEW STORMWATER MANAGEM<strong>EN</strong>TPARADIGMWhen people move into cities they assume that the cityengineers will provide them with all the key services relatedto water management including safe drinking water, sewagetreatment, stormwater removal and flood protection. Giventhese new issues of densification and climate change it isnow apparent that the sole reliance on the engineeringstructural approach is no longer sufficient and the propertyowner will now have to be part of the solution in solving theemerging stormwater problems.The fundamental changes that are required in orderto cope with the new rainfall/runoff regime are to shiftfrom draining and removing water from sites, to storing,detaining and infiltrating rainwater and by enhancing thenatural processes that provide these functions. At the sametime these innovative approaches need to address both thehydrological processes as well as the impacts from nonpointsources of pollution. Enhancing soils, wetlands andplant cover in the watershed and within riparian bufferzones is essential in order to provide sufficient capacity toabsorb, convert and immobilize many of the contaminantsfrom different land use activities.As the water moves from the property to the neighborhoodand into the watershed, the processes change and so do thecontaminants. At the property scale it has been the normto drain all water away from the housing structure and intostormwater pipes. Pollutants from gardening, spills andhousehold activities are all removed through storm drains. Atthe neighborhood scale we have to deal with roads, parkinglots and commercial facilities and many of the transportrelated activities create a wide range of new contaminantssuch as hydrocarbons, oils, grease metals and industrialchemicals. Again these contaminants are directly releasedinto the storm sewer system. At the end of the pipe all ofthe runoff and contaminants end up in the urban streamand we hope that nature will provide sufficient remediationand dilution so as not to harm the ecosystem. To reducethe hydrological and pollution impact on urban streamsrequires a new approach, shown in Table 1, and this differssignificantly from what has traditionally been done.Table 1. Differences between the traditional approach versusthe new innovative approach at the three spatial scales.TRADITIONALAPPROACHINNOVATIVEAPPROACHPROPERTY SCALE Drain and remove rain & runoff Retain rain on site, slow releaseof water though infiltrationsystemsNEIGHBORHOODSCALEWATERSHED SCALEDrain and remove rain & runoffStore water in ponds, developprotective structures (dams &dykes), channelize streamsLand use restriction in floodplainStore and delay runoff usingdetention and filter systemsDelay runoff in wide bufferzone and naturalized streamchannels, improve flood storagewithin the watershed.INNOVATIVE ACTIONS AT DIFFER<strong>EN</strong>T SPATIALSCALESAs shown in Table 2, there are a wide range of innovativeapproaches that need to be adapted in order to reduce theflooding and pollution risks. No single action will be ableto address all issues but a combination of actions at thedifferent spatial scales will be the best recipe for success.Not all of the listed actions in Table 2 will succeed in allareas due to the differences in climatic and site conditions.However, there is now sufficient evidence that using acombination of options can go a long way in reducing therisk of flooding and the amount of contaminants reachingthe urban streams.Canadian Water Network 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!