530 A. Durndell, Z. Haag / <strong>Computer</strong>s in Human Behavior 18 (2002) 521–535analyses, applied to <strong>computer</strong>s, see computing as part of a masculine dominatedtechnology which pays little heed to human values and is often connected to a militaryor aggressive purpose. It could be argued that <strong>the</strong> Internet can be viewed as anextension of this as opposed to being a medium encouraging human equality, or asWeiser (2000) puts it, much of <strong>the</strong> research fails to confirm <strong>the</strong> Internets ‘GreatEqualizer’ metaphor. The Internet’s use as a source of pornography emphasises thislack of equity. Sussman and Tyson (2000), with reference to <strong>computer</strong> mediatedinteraction, argued that gendered power differentiation in communicative styletranscends <strong>the</strong> medium. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, if gendered power relations exist in <strong>the</strong>world, <strong>the</strong>y are to be expected in <strong>computer</strong> use and Internet use as well.Thus, <strong>the</strong> results obtained in <strong>the</strong> current study appear to indicate that <strong>the</strong> literatureon Internet use and <strong>attitudes</strong> is liable to follow <strong>the</strong> existing equivalent literatureon computing, in particular in tending to produce evidence of a gender effect. Theprecise nature of this effect with regard to <strong>the</strong> Internet, and how it manifests in differentsituations will no doubt be quite complex, as with <strong>the</strong> computing literature,but this study does provide some evidence of <strong>the</strong> direction in which it may go.It was indicated in <strong>the</strong> Introduction that <strong>the</strong>re was some evidence and historybehind <strong>the</strong> contention that <strong>the</strong> countries of ex Communist East Europe may notproduce <strong>the</strong> gender effects with respect to technology that have been frequentlyidentified in <strong>the</strong> West (Alting & Brand, 1992). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, as <strong>the</strong>se countriesleave <strong>the</strong>ir past behind, it is possible that a side effect could be that <strong>the</strong>y will begin toproduce <strong>the</strong> technological gender effects of <strong>the</strong>ir western mentors. There has beensome argument as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Soviet system really did produce much genderequality. Buckley (1989), for example, used <strong>the</strong> phrase ‘womens’ double burden’ for<strong>the</strong> situation in <strong>the</strong> USSR where women had to both be responsible for bringing upchildren and going out to work in order to survive. It also may have been <strong>the</strong> casethat really high status technology in <strong>the</strong> military industrial complex was primarily in<strong>the</strong> hands of men in <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, as Durndell et al. (1998)found, when women engineers in Bulgaria were explicitly asked about <strong>the</strong> largenumber of women engineers to be found in <strong>the</strong>ir country, <strong>the</strong>y tended to give creditto <strong>the</strong> former system, particularly to its achievements in education. The unificationof Germany was a special and extreme case where two states were turned into one,and where relative gender neutrality for technology in <strong>the</strong> old East Germany rapidlybecame male dominated in <strong>the</strong> new unified Western dominated state (Nickel, 1993).It may be doubtful that o<strong>the</strong>r states will quite follow this pattern with its specialcircumstances. However, Durndell et al. (1997) and Durndell et al. (2000) producedsome evidence that this may be beginning to happen more slowly elsewhere, and <strong>the</strong>existence of <strong>the</strong> significant gender results found in this study in Romania supportsthat point of view.Finally, <strong>the</strong> reported uses to which <strong>the</strong> Internet was put by this sample provides apattern not too dissimilar to that found elsewhere (Miller & Durndell, 2001), perhapsra<strong>the</strong>r surprisingly in <strong>the</strong> light of <strong>the</strong> relatively poor technological provision inRomania. Table 4 shows that males were on occasions more likely to report using<strong>the</strong> Internet for particular purposes, but that <strong>the</strong>re was also a certain amount ofsimilarity in <strong>the</strong> uses that males and females reported for <strong>the</strong> Internet. Males were
A. Durndell, Z. Haag / <strong>Computer</strong>s in Human Behavior 18 (2002) 521–535 531also more likely to report <strong>the</strong>mselves as being amongst <strong>the</strong> heaviest users of <strong>the</strong>Internet, as measured by reported time spent online per week. O<strong>the</strong>r studies, such asSherman et al. (2000) and Odell, Korgen, Schumacher, and Delucchi (2000) indicatea similar picture whilst varying in detail. The big picture seems to be that whilst<strong>the</strong>re might be a declining, though still existing, difference between males andfemales in overall use of <strong>the</strong> Internet, <strong>the</strong>re are remaining variations in use between<strong>the</strong> genders.In conclusion, this study would seem to support <strong>the</strong> contention that <strong>the</strong> researchliterature on <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>computer</strong>s probably will extrapolate to <strong>the</strong> Internet, and thatthis will include <strong>the</strong> frequent finding of variations due to gender, in contradiction to<strong>the</strong> hopes of some Internet enthusiasts. This study also tends to support <strong>the</strong> point ofview that <strong>the</strong> emerging countries of Eastern Europe will not be immune to <strong>the</strong> genderrelated effects of technology as found in <strong>the</strong> west. Finally, it would be useful todevelop measures of <strong>attitudes</strong>, <strong>anxiety</strong> and <strong>self</strong> <strong>efficacy</strong> <strong>towards</strong> <strong>the</strong> Internet.Appendix A. Corrected item–total correlations <strong>Computer</strong> Anxiety Items (CARS)Item1. I feel insecure about my ability to interpret a <strong>computer</strong>0.44printout2. I look forward to using a <strong>computer</strong> on my job 0.693. I do not think I would be able to learn a <strong>computer</strong>0.47programming language4. The challenge of learning about <strong>computer</strong>s is exciting 0.525. I am confident that I can learn <strong>computer</strong> skills 0.666. Anyone can learn to use a <strong>computer</strong> if <strong>the</strong>y are patient and 0.53motivated7. Learning to operate <strong>computer</strong>s is like learning any new skill, 0.59<strong>the</strong> more you practice, <strong>the</strong> better you become8. I am afraid that if I begin to use <strong>computer</strong>s more I will become 0.40more dependent upon <strong>the</strong>m and lose some of my reasoning skills9. I am sure that with time and practice I will be as comfortable 0.68working with <strong>computer</strong>s as I am in working by hand10. I feel that I will be able to keep up with <strong>the</strong> advances happening 0.65in <strong>the</strong> <strong>computer</strong> field11. I would dislike working with machines that are smarter than 0.43Iam12. I feel apprehensive about using <strong>computer</strong>s 0.7313. I have difficulty in understanding <strong>the</strong> technical aspects of0.46<strong>computer</strong>s14. It scares me to think that I could cause <strong>the</strong> <strong>computer</strong> to destroya large amount of information by hitting <strong>the</strong> wrong key0.59