11.07.2015 Views

Informed Consent Initiative - Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety

Informed Consent Initiative - Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety

Informed Consent Initiative - Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

If a facility so chooses it may also consider including elements and CMS would consider the <strong>for</strong>m a“well-designed” <strong>for</strong>m. The MAPS <strong>In<strong>for</strong>med</strong> <strong>Consent</strong> Form <strong>for</strong> PPS Hospitals and Clinics alsoincludes the following “elective” items: the name and signature of the provider that talked to thepatient about the procedure and obtained consent, the date, time and signature of “professionalperson” witnessing the patient/patient representative signing the consent <strong>for</strong>m. Other optionalelements that may be added are: a listing of the material risks that were discussed, a statement thatphysicians other than the operating practitioner (i.e., residents, other physicians) will be per<strong>for</strong>mingimportant tasks related to the surgery, in accordance with their skills and hospital policies, and astatement that qualified medical professionals who are not physicians, will per<strong>for</strong>m important tasksthat are within their scope of practice determined by law and <strong>for</strong> which they are granted privileges.Critical Access Hospital - Properly-executedThe <strong>for</strong>m titled <strong>In<strong>for</strong>med</strong> <strong>Consent</strong> Form For Critical Access Hospitals includes the minimumelements as outlined in State Operations Manual Appendix W - Survey Protocol, Regulations andInterpretive Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) and Swing-Beds in CAHs <strong>for</strong> a“properly executed” <strong>for</strong>m and other elements that are standard in in<strong>for</strong>med consent.CMS requires a “properly-executed” <strong>for</strong>m include: the name of patient, name of facility where theprocedure is taking place, the name of the patient or legal guardian, the facility name, the procedurename, name of the responsible provider per<strong>for</strong>ming the procedure and the names of practitionersper<strong>for</strong>ming important aspects of the procedures, a statement that the procedure and its risks, benefitsand alternatives were discussed, a signature from the patient or their legal guardian, the name andsignature of the provider that talked to the patient about the procedure and obtained consent, and thedate, time and signature of “professional person” witnessing the patient/patient representativesigning the consent <strong>for</strong>m.How will CMS evaluate compliance with these new in<strong>for</strong>med consent regulations?Evidence will be obtained through review of medical records, interviewing current patients and/orinterviewing hospital personnel to determine their understanding of the hospital’s in<strong>for</strong>med decisionmakingpolicies and how they are implemented.Why is the language of the in<strong>for</strong>med consent <strong>for</strong>m so simple? It may not provideenough in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> some patients.Health-care providers must provide adequate in<strong>for</strong>mation in a manner that a patient can understand,to assure that he or she can effectively exercise the right to make in<strong>for</strong>med decisions about the planof care, medical or surgical interventions, and care after discharge. During times of illness andstressful events, all patients could benefit from easy-to-understand health-care <strong>for</strong>ms. The simplifiedreading level of this <strong>for</strong>m does not prohibit a more in-depth conversation <strong>for</strong> patients that desiremore detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation. CMS’s review procedure will also include interviewing two or three postsurgicalpatients or the patients’ representatives, to determine their ability to provide a clearexplanation of the in<strong>for</strong>med consent process and to determine how satisfied they are with thein<strong>for</strong>med consent discussion prior to their surgery.Where can I find more in<strong>for</strong>mation?Requirements related to in<strong>for</strong>med consent <strong>for</strong> hospitals are found in the <strong>Patient</strong>s’ Rights Condition ofParticipation (CoP) at 42 CFR 482.13(b)(2); the Medical Records CoP at 482.24(c)(2)(v); and theSurgical Services CoP at 482.51(b)(2). The interpretive guidelines revised April 2007 <strong>for</strong> Tags A-0049 (<strong>Patient</strong>s’ Rights), A-0238 (Medical Records), and A-0392 (Surgical Services) replace theguidelines issued in May 2004.Questions may be directed to David Eddinger at CMS, email at david.eddinger@cms.hhs.govTo download the <strong>for</strong>m or the policy, visit www.mnpatientsafety.org.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!