11.07.2015 Views

Graph Topologies and Uniform Convergence in Quasi-Uniform ...

Graph Topologies and Uniform Convergence in Quasi-Uniform ...

Graph Topologies and Uniform Convergence in Quasi-Uniform ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

graph topologies <strong>and</strong> quasi-uniform convergence 139We recall that a T 0 -space Z is called <strong>in</strong>jective if every cont<strong>in</strong>uous mapf : X → Z extends cont<strong>in</strong>uously to any space Y conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g X as a subspace.Corollary 1. Let (X, U) be a quasi-uniform space <strong>and</strong> (Y, τ) an <strong>in</strong>jectivetopological T 0 -space. Let V be a quasi-uniformity compatible with τ. Thefollow<strong>in</strong>g statements are equivalent:byi) Every cont<strong>in</strong>uous function from X to Y is quasi-uniformly cont<strong>in</strong>uous.ii) The proximal topology of (X × Y, U −1 × V) agrees with the topology ofuniform convergence on C(X, Y ).iii) The upper Hausdorff quasi-uniform topology <strong>in</strong>duced by U −1 × V agreeswith the topology of uniform convergence on C(X, Y ).Proof. If Y is a T 0 space it is evident that the specialization order ≤ givenx ≤ y ⇔ x ∈ {y}is a partial order <strong>and</strong> it can be proved (see [9, Chapter II, Theorem 3.8]) thatif Y is an <strong>in</strong>jective space then Y with the specialization order is a cont<strong>in</strong>uouslattice. Furthermore, <strong>in</strong> a cont<strong>in</strong>uous lattice the sup operation is jo<strong>in</strong>tlycont<strong>in</strong>uous with respect to the Scott topology (see [9, Chapter I, Proposition1.11]), so we can apply the theorem above, but the Scott topology (see [9,Chapter II, Theorem 3.8]) is homeomorphic to τ so we have completed theproof.AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful to the referee, <strong>in</strong> particular for suggest<strong>in</strong>g ashorter proof of Theorem 1.References[1] Baronti, M., Pap<strong>in</strong>i, P., <strong>Convergence</strong> of sequences of sets, <strong>in</strong> “Methodsof Functional Analysis <strong>in</strong> Approximation Theory”, ISNM 76, Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1986, 135 – 155.[2] Beer, G., Metric spaces on which cont<strong>in</strong>uous functions are uniformly cont<strong>in</strong>uous<strong>and</strong> Hausdorff distance, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 95 (1985), 653 – 658.[3] , “<strong>Topologies</strong> on Closed <strong>and</strong> Closed Convex Sets”, vol. 268, KluwerAcademic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993.[4] Beer, G., Lechicki, A., Levi, S., Naimpally, S., Distance functionals<strong>and</strong> suprema of hyperspace topologies, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 162 (1992),367 – 381.[5] Berthiaume, G., On quasi-uniformities <strong>in</strong> hyperspaces, Proc. Amer. Math.Soc., 66 (1977), 335 – 343.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!