Bilateral consent to use sperm/embryos for reproductive purposes
Bilateral consent to use sperm/embryos for reproductive purposes
Bilateral consent to use sperm/embryos for reproductive purposes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ELAG (07-07) 4European Convention on Human Rights. Again, the Court found against MsEvans.2.42.52.6The judgement stated that: ‘States were entitled <strong>to</strong> a broad margin ofappreciation in this field, given the complexity of the moral and ethicalissues <strong>to</strong> which IVF treatment gave rise, on which opinions within ademocratic society might reasonably differ widely. There was nointernational or European consensus as <strong>to</strong> the point at which a <strong>sperm</strong> donorshould be allowed effectively <strong>to</strong> withdraw his <strong>consent</strong> and prevent the <strong>use</strong> ofhis genetic material.’Legal regimes similar <strong>to</strong> the UK’s apply in Denmark, France, Greece, theNetherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, Finland and Iceland.However, as outlined in the Grand Chamber judgement, other countrieshave adopted different approaches. These include, <strong>for</strong> example, onlyallowing the male <strong>to</strong> ve<strong>to</strong> ongoing treatment up until the point of fertilisation(rather than implantation) or honouring the prior advance agreement ofparties who anticipate the possibility of a future dispute in relation <strong>to</strong> the fateof <strong>embryos</strong> created using their gametes. Extracts from the judgement are atAnnex A.Human Tissue and Embryos Bill2.7In response <strong>to</strong> these sorts of cases, the Government has proposedintroducing legislative provisions in a Human Tissue and Embryos Bill thatwould allow <strong>for</strong> a one year ‘cooling off’ period ‘following the withdrawal of<strong>consent</strong> <strong>to</strong> embryo s<strong>to</strong>rage by one of the persons whose gametes were<strong>use</strong>d in the creation of the embryo’ 1 . This provision is in line with an HFEAsuggestion <strong>to</strong> the Department of Health’s consultation paper: ‘Review of theHuman Fertilisation and Embryology Act’ 2 .HFEA Code of Practice2.8The HFEA’s Code of Practice (7 th edition) provides the following guidance:Providing proper in<strong>for</strong>mationG.5. 2: In<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong>G.5.2.1. Be<strong>for</strong>e any person gives <strong>consent</strong> <strong>to</strong>:1Draft Human Tissues and Embryos Bill2Cm 6989, December 2006Page 3 of 7 TRIM 07/8609