0 - WorldFish Center
0 - WorldFish Center
0 - WorldFish Center
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
160<br />
140<br />
I20<br />
- 100 -<br />
0<br />
-<br />
r' 80-<br />
0<br />
--<br />
g 60-<br />
40<br />
20<br />
- -<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
005-Lun 25;Jun 15;Jul 04;Aug 24;Aug 13-'Sep 03kt 2310ct 12-l$yO<br />
Sampling date<br />
Fig. 3. Growth of handsexed Oreochromlr nllotkus males in the 0.0077-ha farm pond of<br />
Ibrahim Ansah (Mampong-Nkwanta, Ghana) receiving chicken and goat manure, and farm<br />
residues.<br />
The decline in fish growth in the zero<br />
input experiment was expected. The low<br />
nutrient levels did not encourage growth<br />
of algal and other foods which are essen-<br />
tial to maintain and promote growth af-<br />
ter any initially available food resource in<br />
the water was used up. The fish lost weight;<br />
most of them died and this affected over-<br />
all pond production.<br />
The situation was different in ponds with<br />
previous fertilization histories. Production<br />
was higher in the recently used pond than<br />
in the "fallow" pond. This could be attrib-<br />
uted to the leaching of nutrients from the<br />
pond as a result of the long period of ex-<br />
posure to weather elements like rainfall.<br />
Production in the recently used pond,<br />
-0- We~ght +Total length<br />
220<br />
- 200<br />
- 180<br />
-160<br />
- E<br />
140 - 3z<br />
- 120 6<br />
c<br />
Q)<br />
-100 -<br />
0<br />
-" ,g<br />
-60<br />
- 40<br />
- 20<br />
however, did not indicate another good<br />
yield if the pond was cropped another time.<br />
Obviously, the overall growth attained<br />
in the manured experiments was low. This<br />
was attributable to human error in the<br />
manuring schedule which resulted in a lower<br />
quantity of manure being applied. How-<br />
ever, the overall response of fish growth<br />
to the different manure conforms to ob-<br />
servations in the literature (Hopkins and<br />
Cruz 1982; Pullin and Lowe-McConnell<br />
1982; Owusu-Frimpong et al. 1990, 1991,<br />
1 992).<br />
Fish growth in the pond receiving farm<br />
and household wastes and residues was<br />
highest. It can be inferred that fish production<br />
can be increased fivefold with on-farm and<br />
household wastes as inputs.