24.11.2012 Views

0 - WorldFish Center

0 - WorldFish Center

0 - WorldFish Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160<br />

140<br />

I20<br />

- 100 -<br />

0<br />

-<br />

r' 80-<br />

0<br />

--<br />

g 60-<br />

40<br />

20<br />

- -<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

005-Lun 25;Jun 15;Jul 04;Aug 24;Aug 13-'Sep 03kt 2310ct 12-l$yO<br />

Sampling date<br />

Fig. 3. Growth of handsexed Oreochromlr nllotkus males in the 0.0077-ha farm pond of<br />

Ibrahim Ansah (Mampong-Nkwanta, Ghana) receiving chicken and goat manure, and farm<br />

residues.<br />

The decline in fish growth in the zero<br />

input experiment was expected. The low<br />

nutrient levels did not encourage growth<br />

of algal and other foods which are essen-<br />

tial to maintain and promote growth af-<br />

ter any initially available food resource in<br />

the water was used up. The fish lost weight;<br />

most of them died and this affected over-<br />

all pond production.<br />

The situation was different in ponds with<br />

previous fertilization histories. Production<br />

was higher in the recently used pond than<br />

in the "fallow" pond. This could be attrib-<br />

uted to the leaching of nutrients from the<br />

pond as a result of the long period of ex-<br />

posure to weather elements like rainfall.<br />

Production in the recently used pond,<br />

-0- We~ght +Total length<br />

220<br />

- 200<br />

- 180<br />

-160<br />

- E<br />

140 - 3z<br />

- 120 6<br />

c<br />

Q)<br />

-100 -<br />

0<br />

-" ,g<br />

-60<br />

- 40<br />

- 20<br />

however, did not indicate another good<br />

yield if the pond was cropped another time.<br />

Obviously, the overall growth attained<br />

in the manured experiments was low. This<br />

was attributable to human error in the<br />

manuring schedule which resulted in a lower<br />

quantity of manure being applied. How-<br />

ever, the overall response of fish growth<br />

to the different manure conforms to ob-<br />

servations in the literature (Hopkins and<br />

Cruz 1982; Pullin and Lowe-McConnell<br />

1982; Owusu-Frimpong et al. 1990, 1991,<br />

1 992).<br />

Fish growth in the pond receiving farm<br />

and household wastes and residues was<br />

highest. It can be inferred that fish production<br />

can be increased fivefold with on-farm and<br />

household wastes as inputs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!