7 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9Green <strong>Kirkland</strong> Partnership1 2 34 5 67 8 91 2 34 5 67 8 91 2 34 5 67 8 91 2 34 5 67 8 91 2 34 5 67 8 91 2 34 5 67 8 9Category 9:Low Value, High Threat – 36 Acres<strong>Forest</strong> ConditionAreas estimated to have less than 25% native upper tree canopycover and greater than 50% invasive cover fall into thiscategory.<strong>Restoration</strong> Strategy: Major invasive reduction and majorplantingCategory 9 sites are not likely to get much worse over the next5 <strong>year</strong>s. These sites will require many <strong>year</strong>s <strong>of</strong> major invasiveremoval and site preparation in the form <strong>of</strong> mulching and infillplanting. Although some work will be directed to category 9forests, this is not a priority category for the first 5 <strong>year</strong>s. Thepartnership will likely support efforts that contain the spread<strong>of</strong> invasive plants, try out new techniques, or bolster aggressivecommunity-led efforts.Estimated <strong>Restoration</strong> CostAccording to Green Seattle Partnership analysis, in <strong>20</strong>05 averagerestoration costs for crew time and staff time ranged from$2,800 to $28,000 for a single acre, depending on site conditions.The estimated average cost per acre for restoration variesby Tree-iage category (Table 3). Each category has a differentrestoration strategy and level <strong>of</strong> effort associated with it. Eachsite has unique features that further define costs. We have estimatedrestoration costs based on the Green Seattle analysis forfield work and added additional staff costs including: volunteercoordinator, outreach specialist, field project manager, six-memberfield crew, materials and some maintenance costs. This staffand field component is expected to cost $5.2 million over thenext <strong>20</strong> <strong>year</strong>s, which is far more affordable than the cost <strong>of</strong> simplyhiring paid crews to complete the necessary restoration. Thediscount arises from community volunteers who will contributeone hour for every staff hour invested. Working side by sidewith volunteers the partnership will leverage an additional $4.4million in volunteer value over the next <strong>20</strong> <strong>year</strong>s (see page 43 formore details about volunteer contribution).Table 3. Estimated cost <strong>of</strong> city staff and crew time for restoration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kirkland</strong> forestednatural areas .This investment will leverage $4.4m in volunteer contributionsTree-iagecategoryAveragerestoration costAcres Total cost /category1 $2,800 13.16 $36,8482 $9,500 22.32 $212,0403 $15,400 1.73 $26,6424 $9,500 139.86 $1,328,6705 $16,100 76.95 $1,238,8956 $22,000 6.84 $150,4807 $15,400 70.56 $1,086,6248 $22,000 4.2 $92,4009 $27,900 36.48 $1,017,792TOTAL $5,190,39138
<strong>20</strong>-Year <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>Objective 5:Monitor and Maintain Sites over the Long-TermTo be sustainable, urban forests need ongoing maintenance. Aseach forest stand is restored (Phases 1 to 3), it enters the monitoringand maintenance phase. Every <strong>year</strong>, the acreage in thisphase will grow, until at program maturity in <strong>20</strong>27, all 372 acreswill be at maintenance levels only.Without ongoing, long-term volunteer investment in monitoringand maintenance <strong>of</strong> restored areas, <strong>Kirkland</strong>’s forests willfall back into neglect. For that reason, the volunteer commitmentwill be paired with city resources. Each acre restored underthe partnership will be monitored and maintained until <strong>20</strong>28.We will continually check our work against the best available scienceto define optimal plant stock and sizes, watering regimes,soil preparation, and other forest management techniques.We will document monitoring and maintenance eventsto describe locations, workers, and tasks, and we will test andevaluate how effectively various restoration techniques removeinvasive plants and promote native plant survival. This informationwill inform the ongoing monitoring and maintenanceconducted by volunteers and the city though <strong>20</strong>28.Monitoring will be conducted more frequently in theearly phases <strong>of</strong> restoration as we learn how the sites respond torestoration.Objective 6:Identify and Protect Additional Natural AreasEvaluate Properties for AcquisitionThe Cascade Agenda defines several goals with objectivesfor increasing and improving public open spaces in cities. Byworking with recreation enthusiasts, park managers, privatelandowners, elected <strong>of</strong>ficials, and developers,the Cascade LandConservancy developed the following objectives when evaluatingindividual properties for acquisition:1.2.3.Provide attractive and affordable dense communities withample natural areas and parks to provide a quality <strong>of</strong> life thatwill reduce present housing demand, which drives residentialsprawl into natural resource and agricultural landsUse natural areas to buffer residential areas from incompatibleland uses such as industrial or commercial areas andhighways and to serve as urban separatorsProvide trails and boulevards to encourage people to recreatein their neighborhoods day-to-day while also havingthe ability to visit neighboring communities and regionalpark network on longer outings4.5.6.Establish parks within walking distance <strong>of</strong> every residentand provide sufficient parkland for residents to enjoy active,high-quality passive recreation in their own neighborhoods.To do so, we should accelerate the following current standardsfor park creation and management:00 Secure all unused railroad rights-<strong>of</strong>-ways for new trail corridorsor hold for future natural area use00 Redefine and optimize public spaces to improve the quality<strong>of</strong> natural areas and open space experiences by doingthe following:~~ Using street and utility rights-<strong>of</strong>-ways as pocketparks, linear natural areas and/or trail corridors. Thisapproach could be advanced by converting low-volumestreet corridors, especially as the availability <strong>of</strong>mass transit increases in urban areas~~ Capping <strong>of</strong> water reservoirs or landfills, increasingsecurity <strong>of</strong> our drinking supplies, while providingnatural areas and open space facilities00 Prioritize conversion to natural areas over asset disposalwhen publicly-owned properties are no longer useful fororiginal public purpose. Develop “no-net-loss” policiesfor public parks and trails00 Incentivize private landowners to create public courtyardsin building or site design, especially in findingcreative means to enhance the interface between publicand private property. Focus on re-greening the areasbetween residences and streets by providing verdant buffersand canopies along the thoroughfares and parkinglotsInvest in the reforestation <strong>of</strong> both public and private urbanlands to establish the native plant communities and canopiesthat will create a connected and high-quality landscapefor the next centuryProvide a wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> recreational opportunities,active and passive, traditional and emerging, all linked witheducational opportunities, to engage citizens in the landscapeand park systems:00 Ensure all children have opportunities to experience openspaces and natural areas; include conservation educationand an outdoor experience in curriculum <strong>of</strong> every gradeschool00 Develop parks in a manner that <strong>of</strong>fers natural areas, experimentalforests, community gardens, demonstration areasand interpretive trails within easy reach <strong>of</strong> school groupsand individuals39