MAKING VALID AND RELIABLE DECISIONS IN ... - CCSSO projects

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHIEFSTATESCHOOLofCOUNCILOFFICERSMAKING VALID AND RELIABLE DECISIONS INDETERMINING ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESSA Paper In The Series: Implementing The State Accountability SystemRequirements Under The No Child Left Behind Act Of 2001December 2002ASR-CAS Joint Study Group on Adequate Yearly ProgressSCOTT MARION, Co-ChairCAROLE WHITE, Co-ChairDALE CARLSONWILLIAM J. ERPENBACHSTANLEY RABINOWITZJAN SHEINKERComprehensive Assessment Systems for ESEA Title IAccountability Systems and ReportingState Collaborative on Assessment and Student StandardsCOUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS—WASHINGTON, DCISBN 1-884037-80-1Making Valid and Reliable Decisions in Determining AYP
Page 4: AcknowledgementsThis paper resulted
Page 7 and 8: Chapter1Introduction: Defining the
Page 9 and 10: Intent and Purpose of this PaperThe
Page 11 and 12: Accountability Requirements Under t
Page 13 and 14: did not address this issue either.
Page 15 and 16: States may select any academic indi
Page 17 and 18: TABLE 2. AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE 37
Page 19 and 20: Kane, Staiger, and Geppert (2002),
Page 21 and 22: States that currently include asses
Page 23 and 24: Determination of starting points in
Page 25 and 26: ReferencesEducation Commission of t
Page 27 and 28: Chapter2Improving the Validity and
Page 29 and 30: 5. Establishing the validity of a s
Page 31 and 32: including science, medicine, and la
Page 33 and 34: The SecondWave—ConstructValidity.
Page 35 and 36: Both of these aspects are important
Page 37 and 38: either implicitly or explicitly. Si
Page 39 and 40: The Focus of the ReformsThe second
Page 41 and 42: An extrapolation of this line of re
Page 43 and 44: The alignment between the standards
Page 45 and 46: • The system is accomplishing wha
Page 47 and 48: The natural tendency is to accept p
Page 49 and 50: that “validation can be viewed as
Page 51 and 52: school that did poorly; the finite-
Page 53 and 54:
EXHIBIT 1. AN ANALYSIS OF SOME LIKE
Page 55 and 56:
A “Checklist” Related to Examin
Page 57 and 58:
Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspe
Page 59 and 60:
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter3A Framework for Policy Deci
Page 63 and 64:
of the law. However, equally import
Page 65 and 66:
needs to incorporate aspects of bot
Page 67 and 68:
FIGURE 8. DECISION-MAKING PROCESS F
Page 69 and 70:
Initial Data Simulations and State
Page 71 and 72:
TABLE 4. EFFECTS OF ALTERING MINIMU
Page 73 and 74:
the confidence intervals would be s
Page 75 and 76:
When the NCLB Act became law in Jan
Page 77 and 78:
only every other year. While this s
Page 79 and 80:
ReferencesFinally, this chapter was
Page 81 and 82:
Chapter4Summary and ConclusionsThis
Page 83 and 84:
Whether the State accountability sy
Page 85 and 86:
permitted under the law. The “saf
Page 87 and 88:
AYP due to falling below the minimu
Page 89 and 90:
Policy Implications: Schools may fi
Page 91 and 92:
Consequences: For States choosing t
Page 93 and 94:
What is the impact on the validity
Page 95 and 96:
AppendixAExcerpts from The No Child
Page 97 and 98:
Sec. 1111(b)(2)(A)(i): Accountabili
Page 99 and 100:
AppendixBThe NCLB Act “Safe Harbo
Page 101 and 102:
they would have had to have had at
Page 103 and 104:
AppendixCCritical Questions and Rel
Page 105 and 106:
4. Multiple Measures and Indicators
Page 107 and 108:
AppendixDGlossaryThe following Glos
Page 109 and 110:
Face Validity Evidence: Tests that
Page 111:
AccountabilitySystems &ReportingCAS
show all

MAKING VALID AND RELIABLE DECISIONS IN ... - CCSSO projects

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?