the perception of muslim consumers towards corporate social ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences 76March, Vol. 4 (2)Islamic responsibility is placed as the fourth important dimension perceived by the respondents.Though previous studies found that religiosity influenced individuals‟ perception towards CSR, this studyprovides a contrasting finding. Such result could be attributed to physiological factor where majority ofstakeholders in Kelantan are Muslims and the ruling government in this state is an Islamic political party.Hence Muslim stakeholders in Kelantan believe that Muslims are deemed to practice Islamic religious valuesin their life as well as the non-Muslims businessmen fulfilling for the needs of majority Muslim consumers.As a result, there is less concern on this dimension of Islamic value of companies.Kelantanese Muslim consumers perceived ethical dimension to be the least important responsibility tobe considered by companies. Implication of this finding is that consumers believe that as long as companiescomply with the rules and regulations, they are considered to be ethical and hence consumers are leastconcerned on this matter. This result is in contrast to Carroll‟s model (1979, 1991) that places philanthropicresponsibility at the top of the pyramid. Previous studies (Edmondson & Carroll, 1999; Ibrahim & Angelidis,1995; Ibrahim et al., 2003; Pinkston & Carroll, 1996; Smith et al., 2001) found that although ethics was notconsidered to be the most important goals of companies, stakeholders view that being ethical is important forcompanies to maintain their good reputation.Overall, result of the survey found that Muslim stakeholders‟ perceived CSR dimensions differently,indicating that none of these dimensions have the same level of importance as proposed in Carroll‟s model ofCSR and Islamic value is also perceived as not so important as compared to legal responsibility of CSR.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONThe focus of this study is Muslim consumers‟ perception towards corporate social responsibility inMalaysia. Understanding of such perception could assist companies in determining whether Muslimstakeholders recognize the importance of CSR so that companies could make strategic plan and takeappropriate actions to ensure their long term sustainability by meeting customers‟ expectations and demands.Malaysia is a multi-racial country with Malays (being Muslims) as the majority (60% of thepopulation). A survey was conducted in Kelantan where 95 percent of its 1,634,200 5 population comprise ofthe Malay society (the Kelantan Tourism Information Center ,2009). Therefore, this study could assistcompanies in obtaining information in identifying whether religious belief could influence Muslimconsumers support towards socially responsible companies. If consumers‟ perception towards religious valueis high, companies need to ensure that this value is taken into consideration in their business operation. Thisstudy, however, found that religious dimension was not highly perceived as most important. Muslimconsumers in Kelantan perceived legal responsibility as the most important CSR dimensions. The consumerswere more concerned about companies conforming to rules and regulation as good citizen and not aboutwhether companies achieve high levels of economic performance or upholding religious or ethical values.The finding of this study highlights that consumers also expect companies to be actively involved inphilanthropic activities. This is in line with the government‟s active role in encouraging companies tocontribute to the society. Therefore in order to show support in improving the society‟s quality of life,companies need to establish clear policy and strategies on how they could help to do this.Since this study focuses only on Muslim consumers in Kelantan, generalization of the findings couldnot be made. Therefore, there is a need for further research in this area and for better understanding ofconsumers‟ behavior towards corporate social responsibilities.5Source: http://www.statistics.gov.my© 2011 British Journals ISSN 2048-125X
British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences 77March, Vol. 4 (2)REFERENCESAbdul Hamid, A., & Ibrahim, F. (2010, March, 22). Muslim NGOs can help check 'Halal' logo abuse. TheStar, p. N6,Abdul Rashid, M. Z., & Ho, J. A. (2003). Perceptions of Business Ethics in a Multicultural Community: TheCase of Malaysia Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 75-87.Abdul Rashid, M. Z., & Ibrahim, S. (2002). Executive and Management Attitudes towards Corporate SocialResponsibility in Malaysia. Corporate Governance, 2,4, 10-16.Agle, B. R., & Van Buren III, J. H. (1999). God and Mammon: The Modern Relationship Business EthicsQuarterly, 9(4), 563-582.Amran, A., and Abdul Khalid, S.N. (2009). Corporate Social Reporting in Malaysia: A Case of Micmikingthe West and Succuming to Local Pressure. Social Responsibility Journal, 5 (3), 358-375.Angelidis, J., & Ibrahim, N. (2004). An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Degree of Religiousness Upon anIndividual‟s Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 119-128.Arslan, M. (2001). The Work Ethic Values of Protestant British, Catholic Irish and Muslim TurkishManagers. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(4), 321-339.Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What Will Consumer Pay for Social Product Features.Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281-304.Basmeih, S. A. (1999). Tafsir Pimpinan AR-RAHMAN Kepada Pengertian AL-QURAN: 30 JUZ (10th ed.).Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Yayasan Islam Terengganu Sdn. Bhd.Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibility of the Businessmen. New York, Harper Row.Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2007). Positioning Stakeholder Theory within the Debate on CorporateSocial Responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(1), 5-15.Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and ConsumerProduct Responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(January), 68-84.Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy ofManagement Review, 4(4), 497-505.Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility – Toward the Moral Management ofOrganizational Stakeholders Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.Carroll, A. B. (1998). The Four Faces of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100, 1-7.Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business andSociety, 38(3), 268-295.Carroll, A. B. (2004). Managing Ethically with Global Stakeholders: A Present and Future Challenge.Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 114-120.Coakes, S. J., Steed, L., & Ong, C. (2009). SPSS: Analysis without Anguish: Version 16.0 for Windows (1sted.). China: John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd.Conroy, S. J., & Emerson, T.L.N., (2004). Business Ethics and Religion: Religiousity as a Predictor ofEthical Awareness, Journal of Business Ethics, 50 (383-396).Creyer, E. H. (1997). The Influence of Firm Behavior: Do Consu mers Really Care about Business Ethics? .Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421-432.Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1-14.Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and against Business Assumptions of Social Responsibility. Academy ofManagement Journal, 16(2), 312-322.Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures - ATheoretical Foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311.© 2011 British Journals ISSN 2048-125X
Page 3: While the probability parameters (a
Page 6 and 7: British Journal of Economics, Finan
Page 16: British Journal of Economics, Finan

the perception of muslim consumers towards corporate social ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?