11.07.2015 Views

Identification, Biology and Management of Elodea canadensis ...

Identification, Biology and Management of Elodea canadensis ...

Identification, Biology and Management of Elodea canadensis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Program, Miscellaneous Paper A-87-2, US Army Engineer WaterwaysExperiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, pp. 115-121.Prins, H.B.A., J.F.H. Snel, <strong>and</strong> P.E. Zanstra. 1982. The mechanism <strong>of</strong> photosyntheticbicarbonate utilization. In: Studies on Aquatic Vascular Plants,J.J. Symoens <strong>and</strong> S.S. Hoor, eds., Royal Botanical Society <strong>of</strong> Belgium, pp.120-126.Rørslett, B., D. Berge, <strong>and</strong> S.W. Johansen. 1985. Mass invasion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Elodea</strong><strong>canadensis</strong> in a mesotrophic, South Norwegian lake - impact on waterquality. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 22:2920-2926.Sainty, G.R. <strong>and</strong> S.W.L. Jacobs. 1981. Waterplants <strong>of</strong> New South Wales. WaterResources Commission <strong>of</strong> New South Wales. 550pp.Sainty, G.R. <strong>and</strong> S.W.L. Jacobs. 1988. Waterplants in Australia, Sainty & Associates.Sydney, pp. 65-71.Sculthorpe, C.D. 1967. The <strong>Biology</strong> <strong>of</strong> Aquatic Vascular Plants, EdwardArnold, London, 610 pp.Simpson, D.A. 1984. A short history <strong>of</strong> the introduction <strong>and</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> <strong>Elodea</strong>Michx in the British Isles. Watsonia 15:1-9.Taylor, M.E.U. 1971. A study <strong>of</strong> elodea growth in some low-nutrient lakes. In:Symposium on Natural Water Quality <strong>and</strong> Waste Treatment Technology,Massey University, New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, pp. 27-38.US Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers. 1987. Proceedings 21st Annual MeetingAquatic Plant Control Research Program, Miscellaneous Paper A-87-2,US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi,pp. 5-30.Whitfort, L.A. 1982. Investigations into the composition <strong>of</strong> epiphytic communities<strong>and</strong> their influence on the uptake <strong>of</strong> diquat by <strong>Elodea</strong> <strong>canadensis</strong>Rich. MSc. Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales; CSIRO Division <strong>of</strong>Irrigation Research, Griffith, New South Wales, 132 pp.J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 33: 19-22Waterbird Abundance <strong>and</strong> Activity onWaterhyacinth <strong>and</strong> Egeriain the St. Marks River, FloridaABSTRACTWaterbird densities <strong>and</strong> activities were quantified on twononnative plant species, waterhyacinth <strong>and</strong> egeria, in a northFlorida coastal plain river. Individual waterhyacinth mats <strong>and</strong>egeria plots were marked in three successive river sections,<strong>and</strong> birds were viewed weekly from 7 July to 20 September1991. Total bird densities <strong>and</strong> counts for individual specieswere similar between plant species on all observation dates(P>0.05). The Little blue heron, Common moorhen, <strong>and</strong> theTricolored heron were the most common species <strong>and</strong> foragingwas the primary activity on both plant species. Birds stalkingin waterhyacinth most <strong>of</strong>ten obtained prey located nearthe perimeter <strong>of</strong> mats, <strong>and</strong> rarely hunted for food in the interior<strong>of</strong> mats.Key words: coastal river, nonnative plant, Little blue heron,Tricolored heron, Common moorhen, bird foraging.INTRODUCTIONBird distributions within water-bodies are <strong>of</strong>ten related toprey densities <strong>and</strong> the ability <strong>of</strong> individual species, through1 Florida Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Protection, Bureau <strong>of</strong> AquaticPlant <strong>Management</strong>, 3917 Commonwealth Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida32399, USA. Received for publication March 28, 1994 <strong>and</strong> in revised formJanuary 4, 1995.2 Collopy, M. W. <strong>and</strong> H. L. Jelks. 1989. Distribution <strong>of</strong> foraging wadingbirds in relation to the physical <strong>and</strong> biological characteristics <strong>of</strong> freshwaterwetl<strong>and</strong>s in southwest Florida. Florida Game <strong>and</strong> Fresh Water Fish Comm.Nongame Wildl. Prog. Final Rep. Tallahassee, FL. 102pp.WILLIAM BARTODZIEJ AND G. WEYMOUTH 1specialized adaptations, to efficiently capture prey (Jenni1969, Kushlan 1973, Willard 1977, Kushlan 1978). Aquaticvegetation, which commonly harbors invertebrate <strong>and</strong> vertebrateprey, is generally considered a more favorable foraginghabitat than deep, open-water areas. In terms <strong>of</strong> waterbirdforaging success, certain vegetation communities may providebetter hunting grounds than others (Zaffke 1984) 2 .Little if any data exists on waterbird abundance <strong>and</strong>behavior on river plants found in Florida. The purpose <strong>of</strong>this study was to quantify bird densities <strong>and</strong> record bird activitieson the nonnative egeria (Egeria densa Planchon) <strong>and</strong>waterhyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms].STUDY SITEThe St. Marks River (30° 16'N, 84° 08'W), located in akarst area <strong>of</strong> Wakulla County, Florida, is spring-fed <strong>and</strong> flowsfor approximately 30 km through flat coastal woodl<strong>and</strong>s. In1988, the Florida Legislature passed a moratorium on herbicideapplications to control aquatic vegetation, primarilywaterhyacinth, in this river. That action resulted in ananthropogenically undisturbed, but naturally dynamic plantcommunity in which to observe bird abundance <strong>and</strong> behavior.Since 1988, the waterhyacinth population has exp<strong>and</strong>ed,with frequency-<strong>of</strong>-occurrence estimates varying from 5 to 15percent during the 1989-1992 growing seasons 3 . Althoughwaterhyacinth has the ability to double its biomass (wetweight) in 14 days in unshaded parts <strong>of</strong> the river, weobserved that floods act as a natural control mechanismJ. Aquat. Plant Manage. 33: 1995. 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!