11.07.2015 Views

See full case study - Indiagovernance.gov.in

See full case study - Indiagovernance.gov.in

See full case study - Indiagovernance.gov.in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Governance Knowledge CentrePromoted by Department of Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Reforms and Public GrievancesM<strong>in</strong>istry of Personnel, Public Grievances and PensionsGovernment of IndiaCase StudyEnvironmental Susta<strong>in</strong>abilityGreen Rat<strong>in</strong>g for Integrated HabitatTRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITYAssessmentAugust 2011project is funded by MNRE and TERI; and above all, the resources generated from theregistration fee are utilised to susta<strong>in</strong> GRIHA <strong>in</strong>itiative and thus acts as a revenue generat<strong>in</strong>gmechanism.B. EvaluationAll projects are evaluated <strong>in</strong> two broad stages. The first is the pre-documentation stage/ predesignstage where ADARSH team along with the client’s Integrated Design Team discusstogether to determ<strong>in</strong>e the po<strong>in</strong>ts targeted by the project (out of 100). The second is the postdocumentationstage where all documents are submitted and are evaluated by third partyevaluators to rate and award the project. The build<strong>in</strong>g is evaluated and rated <strong>in</strong> a three tierprocess:i) Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary evaluation: A team of experts from ADARSH reviews the mandatorypo<strong>in</strong>ts and checks for compliance and if not compliant, rejects the project. The nextstep is to evaluate the optional criteria and count the number of achievable po<strong>in</strong>ts.They assess project documents for their correctness and appropriateness; and alsopaid for every criterion they assess.ii)Project report submittals to the Evaluation Committee: The report is sent to theEvaluation Committee compris<strong>in</strong>g of experts <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g, landscape and design forreview.iii)Award<strong>in</strong>g of po<strong>in</strong>ts: The Evaluation Committee <strong>in</strong>dependently review and awardpo<strong>in</strong>ts to the project.C. Rat<strong>in</strong>gM<strong>in</strong>istries’ representatives compris<strong>in</strong>g of the National Advisory Committee are responsible forproject approval and rat<strong>in</strong>g it. The rat<strong>in</strong>g awarded is valid for five years from thecommission<strong>in</strong>g of the build<strong>in</strong>g. The rat<strong>in</strong>g benchmarks are provided with detail <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>the subsequent paragraphs after the audit<strong>in</strong>g process.D. Audit<strong>in</strong>gGRIHA reserves the right to conduct random audits by visit<strong>in</strong>g the site or look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to thecriteria for which po<strong>in</strong>ts have been awarded.7Researched and documented byOneWorld Foundation India

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!