Corporate Presentation - Orbite Aluminae Inc.

Forward Looking StatementsCautionary Note Regarding Canadian Mineral Disclosure StandardsCertain information contained in this document may include “forward‐looking statements”. Forward‐looking statements may include statements regarding Orbite Aluminae Inc. (“Orbite” or the “Company”) intentions,beliefs or current expectations about its projects, costs, objectives and future returns of the Company, or hypotheses underlying these items. In this document, words such as “may”, “would”, “could”, “will”, “likely”,“believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “estimate” and similar words and the negative form thereof are used to identify forward‐looking statements. Forward‐looking statements should not be read asguarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether, or the times at or by which, such future performancewillbeachieved.Forward‐looking statements are based oninformation available at the time and/or management’s good‐faith beliefs with respect to future events, and are subject to known or unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other unpredictable factors, many ofwhich are beyond the Company’s control. These risks uncertainties and assumptions include, but are not limited to, those described in the section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) entitled “Riskand Uncertainties” as filed on March 22, 2012 on SEDAR ,and in the section ‘’Risk Factors’’ of the Annual Information Form of March 30th, 2012 also filed on SEDAR, and could cause actual events or results to differmaterially from those projected in any forward‐looking statements. The Company does not intend, nor does it undertake any obligation to update, or revise any forward‐looking statements or other informationcontained in this document to reflect subsequent information, events or circumstances or otherwise, except as required by applicable laws. The Revised Preliminary Economic Assessment (the “PEA”) on the Company’sMetallurgical Grade Alumina project (the “SGA Project” or “SGA Plant”) with an effective date of November 24, 2011 and a revised report date of May 30, 2012, is preliminary in nature and it includes Indicated MineralResources of clay that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. There is no certainty that theconclusions reached in the PEA will be realized. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves have not demonstrated economic viability.The Company is required to provide technical information with respect to mineralization on its Grand‐Vallée property in accordance with Canadian standards which differ significantly from the requirements of theUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and resource information contained in this document, the PEA and other public disclosure documents filed by the Company on SEDAR may not becomparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies that are subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the SEC. This document and the PEA include references to mineral resource estimates thathave been calculated in accordance with National Instrument 43‐101 ‐ Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43‐101”), as required by Canadian securities regulatory authorities. In particular, this documentand the PEA use the terms “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources.” Readers are cautioned that the term "resource" does not equate to the term "reserves". Further, the definitions of proven andprobable reserves used in NI 43‐101 differ from the definition of “reserves” under U.S. standards. Under SEC standards, mineralization may not be classified as a "reserve" unless the determination has been made thatthe mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. Among other things, all necessary permits would be required to be in hand or issuanceimminent in order to classify mineralized material as reserves under the SEC standards. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Readers are cautioned not toassume that all or any part of indicated or inferred mineral resources will ever be converted into reserves. The SEC's disclosure standards normally do not permit the inclusion of information concerning "indicatedmineral resources" or "inferred mineral resources" or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by U.S. standards in documents filed with the SEC. Readersshould also understand that “inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any partof an “inferred mineral resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimated “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility or pre‐feasibility studies except in rarecases.Marc Filion, Eng., a Qualified Person, reviewed the technical information disclosed herein. Dr. Filion is a Consultant of Orbite, and as such, is not independent pursuant to NI 43‐101.For a detailed breakdown of the Company’s resource position and Preliminary Economic Assessment for the SGA plant see the ORT May 31, 2012 press release, available on the Company’s website.Orbite Aluminae Inc. TSX: ORT OTCQX: EORBF2