Table 2Gonadal Distribution <strong>in</strong> 37a <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>African</strong> Black <strong>XX</strong> <strong>True</strong> HermaphroditesSIDEGONAD DISTRIBUTION Left Right No. OF PATIENTSIndividual:Lateral ................... Ovary Testis l 6 (16.2%)Testis Ovary 1Bilateral .................. Ovotestis Ovotestis 7 (18.9%)Unilateral ................. Ovary Ovotestis 15 19 (51.4%)Ovotestis Ovary 4Testis Ovotestis 2 3 (8.1%)Ovotestis Testis 1Other ...................... ? Ovotestis 2 (5.4%)Total 37Total:Ovaries ................... 20 (57.1%) 5 (13.5%) 25 (34.7%)Testes .................... 3 (8.6%) 6 (16.2%) 9 (12.5%)Ovotestes ................. 12 (34.3%) 26 (70.3%) 38 (52.8%)Total ..................... 35 37 72a The histological report on the 38th patient cannot be traced to determ<strong>in</strong>e the exact gonadal distribution.Table 3Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Data on 38 <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>African</strong> Black <strong>XX</strong> <strong>True</strong> HermaphroditesTotal No.Parameter No. of Patients AssessedaAssigned name .18 M; 17 F; 3 N 38Sex of rear<strong>in</strong>g .13 M; 17 F; 3 A 33External genitalia:Enlarged clitoris (or small phallus) .38 38Hypospadias with per<strong>in</strong>eal urethral meatus .33 35Urogenital s<strong>in</strong>us .12 28Separate vag<strong>in</strong>al open<strong>in</strong>g with formed vag<strong>in</strong>a.14 (9 R) 24Palpable gonads: 29Left. 5 (2 I)Right. 8 (4 1)Anomalous labial/scrotal differentiation: 23Labio-scrotal fusion. 6Bifid scrotum .10Uter<strong>in</strong>e and fallopian tube differentiation .20 (9 R, 2 H) 22Anomalous secondary sexual differentiation<strong>in</strong> postpubertal patients (N = 12)b .8 10NoTE.-Median age of the 38 patients at time of presentation was 8 years (range 1 day-39 years).M = Male; F = Female; N = Neutral; A = Ambivalent; R = Rudimentary; H = Hypoplastic; I =Ingu<strong>in</strong>al.a Number of <strong>in</strong>dividuals on whom the relevant <strong>in</strong>formation was available.b Refer to text for details.
8whom had recognizable (though often rudimentaryor hypoplastic) uterus and fallopian tubes. One patienthad a bicornuate uterus.Secondary sexual characteristics are known <strong>in</strong> 10of 12 postpubertal patients; eight showed secondarysexual characteristics contrary to their sex of rear<strong>in</strong>g.All five "males" had anomalous secondary sexualcharacteristics. Gynecomastia was present <strong>in</strong> four ofthem and was associated with a gynecoid body contour<strong>in</strong> three of them. One lacked facial hair. One ofthese <strong>in</strong>dividuals claimed that he performed adequatelyas a male. Two males compla<strong>in</strong>ed of hematuria,but it is not clear whether this was cyclic.Of the five "females" two had no secondary sexualanomalies; both menstruated and had well-developedbreasts. A third woman who menstruated had anandroid build, whereas another had well-developedbreasts, was amenorrheic, had severe acne, a deepvoice, and led a bisexual sex life. One female withvery small breasts compla<strong>in</strong>ed of cyclic hematuria.Pedigree Analysis Based on InterviewsNone of the 11 sets of parents was known to berelated. The only <strong>in</strong>stance of consangu<strong>in</strong>ity occurred<strong>in</strong> family 5, <strong>in</strong> which the proband's maternal grandparentswere related; but their degree of relatedness isuncerta<strong>in</strong> (fig. 1).The probands' parents orig<strong>in</strong>ated from seven differentnegroid chiefdoms (fig. 1). The Zulu, Swazi,and Xhosa are ethnically related, Nguni-speak<strong>in</strong>gpeoples who do not approve of consangu<strong>in</strong>eous marriages.The Ndebele are related to the Nguni-speakersbut form an ethnically dist<strong>in</strong>ct group <strong>in</strong> which there isnot such a strong taboo aga<strong>in</strong>st cous<strong>in</strong> marriages.The second large group are the Sotho-speakers, consist<strong>in</strong>gof Tswana, Sotho, and Pedi, among whomconsangu<strong>in</strong>eous marriages are relatively common(Nurse et al. 1985). Of the 11 families surveyed(fig. 1), five couples were from the same chiefdom(two were Nguni-speakers and three were Sothospeakers),three were from related chiefdoms, andthree were from ethnically unrelated chiefdoms. The11 probands collectively had 42 sibl<strong>in</strong>gs (exclud<strong>in</strong>gsix miscarriages), whose sex ratio was 0.91male: 1female (fig. 1), which is not significantly different (X2[11= 0.24; P > 0.5) from the sex ratio of 1.06males: 1female <strong>in</strong> the general South <strong>African</strong> black population(South Africa [Republic] Department of Statistics1982). The sex ratio (1.08males: lfemale), of all 145male and 134 female relatives was aga<strong>in</strong> not significantlydifferent (X2r[1 = 0.5 P > 0.8) from that <strong>in</strong>Ramsay et al.the general population (South Africa [Republic] Departmentof Statistics 1982). There is no <strong>in</strong>dicationthat the 51 <strong>in</strong>dividuals of unknown sex showed anyfeatures of sexual ambiguity.Likewise, there was no <strong>in</strong>dication <strong>in</strong> any of thepedigrees (fig. 1) that the probands had similarly affectedsibl<strong>in</strong>gs, nieces, nephews, aunts, uncles, orcous<strong>in</strong>s (none of the sibl<strong>in</strong>gs or other family memberswere, however, personally exam<strong>in</strong>ed to confirm theirphenotypic normality). Many of the probands' sibl<strong>in</strong>gshad died of unknown causes before puberty, butthis is perhaps not unusual <strong>in</strong> families from a socioeconomicallydeprived community, <strong>in</strong> which the <strong>in</strong>fantmortality rate is high.Four of 58 adult maternal sibl<strong>in</strong>gs (two males andtwo females) had no children, and five of 52 paternalsibl<strong>in</strong>gs (four males and one female) were childless(fig. 1). There is no <strong>in</strong>dication that any of these <strong>in</strong>dividualseither was childless because of <strong>in</strong>fertility orhad any anomaly of sexual differentiation.None of the probands was a tw<strong>in</strong> or had tw<strong>in</strong> sibl<strong>in</strong>gs.The proband <strong>in</strong> family 9 (fig. 1) had tw<strong>in</strong>nieces, and the maternal aunt of proband 10 hadapparently given birth to three sets of tw<strong>in</strong>s whosesexes and zygosity are not known. DZ tw<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g isrelatively common <strong>in</strong> South <strong>African</strong> blacks-12.5/1,000 births compared with 3.8/1,000 births formonozygotic tw<strong>in</strong>s (J. Kromberg, personal communication).The parental ages are known <strong>in</strong> eight of the 11families (fig. 1). The median age of eight mothers atthe time of their affected child's birth was 26.5 years,with a range of 19-40 years. The median age of eightfathers was 32.5 years, with a range of 21-40 years.These median ages are not strik<strong>in</strong>gly different fromthat estimated for the black community <strong>in</strong> general(W. P. Mostert, personal communication). The probandwas the last born <strong>in</strong> four families and secondlast <strong>in</strong> three families. Only three of the 11 probandswere first born (fig. 1).No useful <strong>in</strong>formation was obta<strong>in</strong>ed about the useof conventional or traditional medications dur<strong>in</strong>gpregnancies lead<strong>in</strong>g to the birth of probands.Cytogenetic StudiesSex-chromat<strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g of buccal smears was performed<strong>in</strong> 13 of 38 patients. Their X-chromat<strong>in</strong>values ranged between 20% and 30% (>15% is acceptedas the lower limit <strong>in</strong> our laboratory for nonmosaic<strong>XX</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals). None of them showed any Ychromat<strong>in</strong>-positive nuclei. A total of 2,132 meta-