L ettersRaising HopesAre Aricept and other Alzheimer’s drugs being oversold?My spouse, a U <strong>of</strong> T alumnus, is afflictedwith Alzheimer’s and, until recently, resistedtaking the drug Aricept. So I wasinterested to read in “Untangling Alzheimer’s”(Winter <strong>20</strong>08) that Ariceptreduces the symptoms <strong>of</strong> Alzheimer’s butdoes not halt or slow its progression. Ideplore the fact that doctors encouragepatients to take this drug, thus givingthem false hope. I have worked in thehealth-care field for 30 years and havewitnessed the dreadful effects drugs canhave on patients. I understand the purpose<strong>of</strong> research in the health-care fieldand applaud its progress in controllingthe ill effects <strong>of</strong> so many diseases. Whatbothers me is that drug research is fundedmostly by multinational pharmaceuticalcompanies. Although I don’t believe thisaffects the outcome <strong>of</strong> the research, I dothink it taints the information that’sreleased to the population at large,including medical practitioners.Gisele BrettSaint-Sauveur, QuebecFUTURE RISKTO LOCAL ACCESSPresident David Naylor states in hiscolumn in the winter issue (“GTAOverload?”) that students from theGTA account for almost 75 per cent <strong>of</strong>U <strong>of</strong> T’s undergraduate enrolment, andthat demand for a university educationin Ontario is expected to rise dramatically.I was appalled to read that U <strong>of</strong> Tis considering an enrolment strategythat will favour students who can affordto live on campus.Even middle-income families struggleto meet rising tuition costs. My childrenwill not be able to afford to live on campus.U <strong>of</strong> T’s policy should focus onincreasing capacity to support commutingstudents, which is a way <strong>of</strong> life in theGTA. If accessibility to education declines,U <strong>of</strong> T will not remain a top university.Please reconsider U <strong>of</strong> T’s futureundergraduate enrolment policy.Deborah Ellen Wildish (née Boyko)MA 1995Mississauga, OntarioWHERE ARE THE WOMEN?The winter issue included articles onRichard Florida, the new director <strong>of</strong> theLloyd and Delphine Martin ProsperityInstitute, and David Palmer, the university’snew chief advancement <strong>of</strong>ficer.While the magazine is not responsiblefor these appointments, it is a lensthrough which alumni view U <strong>of</strong> T. Andwhat a vision we behold: the consistentappointment <strong>of</strong> men to leadership positions,which your magazine has highlightedin this issue and others.The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Toronto</strong>’s <strong>20</strong>06employment equity report, availableonline at www.hrandequity.utoronto.ca,shows that the university is making aconcerted effort to hire more femalepr<strong>of</strong>essors across all faculties. However,it is clear from U <strong>of</strong> T <strong>Magazine</strong> articlesand the employment equity report thatwomen are not reflected equitably inleadership positions. In <strong>20</strong>06, womenheld 32 per cent <strong>of</strong> academic leadershippositions at the university, comparedwith 25 per cent a year earlier. Thoughthe university is certainly heading in theright direction, it has a long way to go.Perhaps the next time the magazine coversleadership appointments, it willtackle the absence <strong>of</strong> women head-on.Tamara MasseyBEd <strong>20</strong>00<strong>Toronto</strong>A MODEL GRADThank you for your recent feature onDr. Samantha Nutt’s life and work(“Witness to War,” Autumn <strong>20</strong>07). Sheis the kind <strong>of</strong> role model women <strong>of</strong> mygeneration rarely see in the media but sodesperately need.Andrea NusseyBA 1998<strong>Toronto</strong>8 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO MAGAZINE / SPRING <strong>20</strong>08
NOT JUST HIGGSIn “God’s Laboratory” (Winter <strong>20</strong>08),Dan Falk repeats an error that has circulatedsince the discovery <strong>of</strong> the BEH(Brout, Englert, Higgs) mechanism in1964. It is sometimes referred to as theHiggs mechanism, but recently the BEHterminology has gained in use amongthe cognoscenti.An article by François Englert and I,published in Physical Review Letters in1964, preceded Higgs’ contribution bythree months. These two foundingpapers are complementary in their theoreticalformulations and both should beread by people who are interested in thesubject. The only substantial difference isthat our work was more general, both inits applicability and in the presentation<strong>of</strong> an alternative mechanism calleddynamical breakdown <strong>of</strong> symmetry, aswell as the more frequently cited scalarfield mechanism.It is unfortunate that mistaken historicalreferences still appear in popular articleson the subject. A review for ascientific, but not expert, readership iscontained in a chapter <strong>of</strong> Facts and Mysteriesin Elementary Particle Physics(World Scientific Publishers, <strong>20</strong>02), byMartinus Veltman. In that book, portraits<strong>of</strong> the three authors <strong>of</strong> the BEHmechanism are printed side by side. In<strong>20</strong>04, we were awarded the Wolf Prizein Physics.Robert BroutVisiting Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Perimeter Institute,<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> WaterlooWaterloo, OntarioHEROESI was intrigued to see the letters concerningKenneth Macalister and FrankPickersgill in response to the article“Behind Enemy Lines” (Autumn<strong>20</strong>07). Readers will be interested toknow that I am publishing A GloriousMission: The Secret Wars <strong>of</strong> Ken Macalisterand Frank Pickersgill in fall <strong>20</strong>08under my imprint at HarperCollinsCanada. Their remarkable story is toldin full for the first time by the awardwinninghistorian Jonathan Vance andwill add to our appreciation <strong>of</strong> thesetwo young heroes. Every time I pass theSoldiers’ Tower I think <strong>of</strong> them.Phyllis BruceMA 1967<strong>Toronto</strong>FLATTERY, OR KINDNESS?In Conrad McCallum’s item on theemergence <strong>of</strong> flattery in children(Leading Edge, Winter <strong>20</strong>08), two reasons– both self-serving – are cited forwhy a child flatters an artist. Couldthere be a third reason: the child isbeing kind and does not want to hurtthe artist’s feelings?Nina Truscott (née Elensky)BA 1964 UCBurlington, Ontariothe Faculty Club<strong>of</strong>fers all members and their guestsan elegant space for special events,meetings, conferences, receptions& weddings.thefacultyCLUBEnjoy fine dining in the WedgwoodDining Room or the Oak andBeaver Pub. Relax in front <strong>of</strong> thefirepace in the Main Lounge orFairley Lounge while admiringoriginal Group <strong>of</strong> Seven paintings.Member’s benefits to this exclusive, private club arereciprocal privileges with more than 100 other clubs inNorth America, England, and China also discounts onmany local businesses. We welcome everyone.Join the Club! Low alumni rate!For more information, please call 416 978 6325or visit www.utoronto.ca/facultyclub/WWW.MAGAZINE.UTORONTO.CA 9