27.11.2012 Views

May 26, 1999 - Center for Audit Quality

May 26, 1999 - Center for Audit Quality

May 26, 1999 - Center for Audit Quality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Revenue Recognition — Among other things, the SAB will describe the<br />

staff's views about accounting <strong>for</strong> "bill and hold" transactions (as described in<br />

AAER 108), as well as other recent registrant issues. Mr. Turner stated that<br />

the SAB will require the company to have persuasive evidence of an<br />

agreement, the sales price will need to be fixed or determinable and<br />

collectible, and delivery or per<strong>for</strong>mance must be substantially complete. If the<br />

registrant is a service company, revenue should be recognized as the service<br />

is per<strong>for</strong>med. He added that registrants will not be allowed to record up-front<br />

revenue when significant obligations still exist. Registrants with both product<br />

and service revenues will be required to disclose revenue recognition policies<br />

<strong>for</strong> each separately.<br />

• Asset Impairments and Restructuring Charges — Mr. Turner made the<br />

following observations with respect to this SAB: (1) It will be expanded to also<br />

address "other special charges"; (2) It will require restructuring "plans" to be<br />

completed in a short enough time that changes to the plan are not<br />

anticipated; (3) It will require plans to be sufficiently detailed; (4) It will<br />

emphasize the necessity to continually assess the useful life of recorded<br />

goodwill in relation to factors that are impacting the company; and (5) It will<br />

likely address capitalization of internal costs relating to acquisitions.<br />

IV. EARNINGS MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE<br />

Robert Bayless reported that the Earnings Management Task Force, which includes<br />

members from every industry group, is continuing its earnings management<br />

initiatives. Several companies with large restructuring and other charges were<br />

selected <strong>for</strong> review. Mr. Bayless's overall impression is that the task <strong>for</strong>ce has been<br />

highly effective in bringing accounting and disclosure issues to the attention of the<br />

necessary individuals. As a result, the task <strong>for</strong>ce may soon be able to turn their<br />

attention to other issues, such as segment reporting and customer acquisition costs.<br />

V. SEGMENT REPORTING<br />

Robert Bayless stated that the staff is concerned that (1) companies may be<br />

improperly aggregating their operating segments and (2) aggregations used by<br />

companies <strong>for</strong> external reporting purposes are not the same as the aggregations<br />

generated <strong>for</strong> internal decision making purposes. The staff will request internal<br />

reporting in<strong>for</strong>mation when a company's segment reporting doesn't make sense in<br />

light of other in<strong>for</strong>mation included in the filing.<br />

VI. CUSTOMER ACQUISITION COSTS<br />

The staff has recently seen large write-offs of customer acquisition costs and is<br />

concerned that management is not properly evaluating the useful lives of these costs<br />

at the time of their acquisition. The staff stated that amortization periods should be<br />

based upon management's evaluation of specific facts and circumstances, including<br />

customer attrition rates. The staff will not accept arguments that other companies in<br />

the same industry use the same amortization period.<br />

VII. YEAR 2000 READINESS AND DISCLOSURE<br />

The Committee noted that some companies have received letters from Brian Lane<br />

regarding their Year 2000 disclosures. The letters are addressed "Dear Chief

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!