STRATEGY 8ADOPT AN ENTERPRISEAPPROACH TO THE ACQUISITIONOF GOODS AND SERVICESHistorically, <strong>the</strong> federal governmenthas taken a decentralized, agencycentricapproach to buying goodsthat practically every organizationneeds. In short, <strong>the</strong> government hasnot taken full advantage of its collectivepurchasing power to get <strong>the</strong> bestdeal for <strong>the</strong> taxpayer.Here’s a graphic example: Buyingindividually, agencies spendmore than $500 million a year oncleaning products through nearly4,000 contracts with 1,200 differentvendors. One agency paid $32 for acase of paper towels, while ano<strong>the</strong>rpaid $61 for <strong>the</strong> exact same product. 10Why shouldn’t every agency knowabout and take advantage of <strong>the</strong>lower price? This is what enterprisestrategic sourcing is all about—agenciesusing <strong>the</strong>ir collective buyingpower to drive down <strong>the</strong> prices <strong>the</strong>ypay for common goods and services.Here, too, <strong>the</strong>re is good news.Beginning with <strong>the</strong> Bush administrationand continuing under PresidentObama, <strong>the</strong> federal governmenthas begun to take a more strategicapproach to sourcing. However, ithas focused on consolidating acquisitionstrategies and contracts at <strong>the</strong>department level, ra<strong>the</strong>r than across<strong>the</strong> federal enterprise. We advocate<strong>the</strong> latter. The government, under<strong>the</strong> leadership of <strong>the</strong> Office of FederalProcurement Policy (OFPP)and GSA, should rapidly expand <strong>the</strong>scope of enterprise strategic sourcing,employing goal leaders, portfoliosand cross-cutting accountability.Already, GSA has implemented a10 Dan Tangherlini, “GSA to Launch 10Strategic Sourcing Initiatives,” GSA Blog,Jan. 10, 2013, http://gsablogs.gsa.gov/gsablog/2013/01/10/gsa-to-launch-10-strategic-sourcing-initiatives. Last accessedJul. 26, 2013.Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative.It currently covers four categoriesof common products and services:office supplies, domestic parcel delivery,print management and wirelesstelecommunications services.Through <strong>the</strong> initiative, agencieshave saved more than $200 millionon office supplies since July 2010. Infiscal 2011, <strong>the</strong> domestic parcel deliveryservices program saved morethan $31 million over what agencieswere paying separately for <strong>the</strong> sameservices.GSA plans to add 10 strategicsourcing categories through 2015.To give this effort even more impetus,OMB last year created a leadershipcouncil to expand <strong>the</strong> initiativeand directed each agency to name astrategic sourcing official and sourceat least two new products a year in2013 and 2014. This council has beencharged with identifying five newcommodities and services a yearthrough fiscal 2014, along with executiveagents to develop <strong>the</strong> contracts.This is fine as far as it goes, butit is a cautious approach. To movestrategic sourcing from being a bestpractice to a mandate, <strong>the</strong> presidentshould designate <strong>the</strong> head of OFPPas <strong>the</strong> federal chief acquisition officer(CAO) with administrative authorityequivalent to <strong>the</strong> federal CIO.The federal CAO should develop andexecute a comprehensive enterpriseacquisition strategy. That strategyshould include goals for responsiblyexpanding enterprise-wide strategicsourcing for common goods and services,consolidating multiple-awardcontracts, making prices transparentand increasing share-in-savings contractingwhere appropriate. Achieving<strong>the</strong>se goals will drive down <strong>the</strong>prices and improve <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong>myriad goods and services <strong>the</strong> governmentbuys. The EERB, in consultationwith <strong>the</strong> CAO, also shoulddesignate enterprise goal leaders foreach of <strong>the</strong>se initiatives.The enterprise acquisition strategyshould greatly enhance <strong>the</strong> federalgovernment’s enormous buyingpower. It should consolidate <strong>the</strong> government’sdemand for commodities,such as cleaning products, to obtainmassive quantity discounts.For goods and services thataren’t amenable to strategic sourcing,government still can take anenterprise approach by making <strong>the</strong>results of all transactions availableto all government buyers and sellers.“The government has not takenfull advantage of its collectivepurchasing power to get <strong>the</strong>best deal for <strong>the</strong> taxpayer.”20 PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE | BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON
And it’s not just pricing informationthat is valuable.For many years, agencies onlyhad access to o<strong>the</strong>r agencies’ procurementdata through <strong>the</strong> FederalProcurement Data System andUSASpending.gov. They can findonly high-level information, suchas total amounts spent on contracts,contract type, <strong>the</strong> name and locationof vendors and ordering officers.More granular information, such as<strong>the</strong> labor costs embedded in a particularservice contract, is far moreuseful but difficult to find. Agenciesrarely share <strong>the</strong> details beyond whatis publicly available so that o<strong>the</strong>rscan take advantage of <strong>the</strong>ir lessonslearned. Though some of <strong>the</strong> informationis proprietary, much can beshared.For example, GSA could create agovernment-wide collaboration siteidentifying upcoming solicitationsand existing agency blanket purchaseagreements so o<strong>the</strong>r agenciescould see whe<strong>the</strong>r an item or serviceSTRATEGY 9BUILD AN ENTERPRISECIVIL SERVICE SYSTEMThe proposals outlined thus far revolvearound a common <strong>the</strong>me: leadingand managing <strong>the</strong> whole of governmentas an integrated enterprisewith a cross-cutting strategy, managementinfrastructure and leadership.But none of <strong>the</strong>se strategieswill be successful without also takingan enterprise approach to managinggovernment’s most importantresource—its people. This requires<strong>the</strong> federal civil service to be rebuilt,modernized and better integrated toconfront cross-agency program andpolicy priorities.Today’s federal civil service systemis obsolete. Its major componentswere last retooled more thanfour decades ago. The civil servicealready has been, or is in <strong>the</strong> processof being, procured by ano<strong>the</strong>ragency.These improvements are movingin <strong>the</strong> right direction, but <strong>the</strong>ycould be driven faster and morecomprehensively under <strong>the</strong> directionof an enterprise goal leader andteam charged with lifting <strong>the</strong> veil onprices, costs, successful negotiationstrategies and o<strong>the</strong>r procurementtechniques across all agencies.Strategic sourcing, expandeduse of multiple-award contracts,procurement and pricing transparencyall can be applied at <strong>the</strong> departmentor agency level for positiveeffect. But for tens of thousands ofcommonly purchased goods and services,<strong>the</strong>y work best and save moremoney when <strong>the</strong>y are applied across<strong>the</strong> enterprise. Without a government-wideCAO and enterprise goalleaders to drive <strong>the</strong>se strategies, <strong>the</strong>yare not likely to happen rapidly orcomprehensively. •today reflects <strong>the</strong> needs and characteristicsof <strong>the</strong> last century’s governmentwork and workforce, not thoserequired for today’s complex, interagencychallenges.A revitalized and revamped civilservice system should ensure thatfederal agencies can attract, motivateand retain skilled, energizedand engaged employees who can bedeployed where needed to support<strong>the</strong> enterprise without compromisingcore civil service principles thathave defined <strong>the</strong> American civil servicesince its inception—merit, politicalneutrality, veterans preference,due process, collective bargainingand non-discrimination. These valuesare inviolable and should guideand govern every federal agency.The system should be based onstate-of-<strong>the</strong>-art human capital practices,with a market-sensitive compensationsystem, recruiting andhiring practices in line with today’scareer patterns and a reward systemthat reinforces high performance.The current system, codified inTitle 5 of <strong>the</strong> U.S. Code, is federal inname only. As it has aged, agenciesboth large and small have brokenfrom its ranks, cutting <strong>the</strong>ir owndeals with Congress for personnelflexibilities to fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ir uniquemissions. The list is long, rangingfrom DOD and <strong>the</strong> Department ofHomeland Security—which havenot fully used <strong>the</strong> flexibilities <strong>the</strong>ywere given—to <strong>the</strong> Internal RevenueService, <strong>the</strong> 17-agency intelligencecommunity and <strong>the</strong> agencies thatoversee <strong>the</strong> banking and financialservices industries. The result is abalkanized system of “haves”—agencieswhose human capital systemshave been exempted from generalcivil service rules—and “have-nots,”those still mired in laws and rulesfirst established in 1949. Employeesworking in “have-not” agencies cannottransfer to “have” agencies withoutcompeting, even at <strong>the</strong> seniorexecutive level.Significant changes are neededif we expect <strong>the</strong> federal governmentto act as an enterprise. This doesn’tmean a system that mandates onesize-fits-allrules or forces <strong>the</strong> “have”agencies back in <strong>the</strong> box. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, itmeans taking advantage of <strong>the</strong> lessonslearned by agencies that havebroken free from Title 5 to developa civil service system up to <strong>the</strong> challengesof 21st-century government.The Partnership for Public Serviceand <strong>Booz</strong> <strong>Allen</strong> <strong>Hamilton</strong> willrelease a detailed framework forthis new enterprise civil servicesystem later this year, but given itsimportance to our overall enterprisestrategy, its basic architecture andapproach are worth describing here.Upon adopting <strong>the</strong> core anchor-BUILDING THE ENTERPRISE 21