Labour-Sponsored Investment FundsGive Unions Control Over CapitalOOne of the criticisms of the freemarketsystem is that workers donot have any control over capitalor over asset distribution. Thatcould be beginning <strong>to</strong> change,<strong>and</strong> the Canadian example couldhave positive repercussions inthe U.S. The emergence ofLabour-Sponsored InvestmentFunds (LSIF) in Canada, like theprovince of Quebec’sFondes de Solidarite(Solidarity Fund), haveprovided unions with anunlikely weapon in thefight <strong>to</strong> maintain <strong>and</strong> createlocal jobs <strong>and</strong> keepcommunities economicallyviable.LSIF’s work <strong>to</strong> activateworkers savings <strong>to</strong> investin good jobs within localcommunities. For example,the Quebec Federation ofLabour (FTQ) during the severeeconomic recession of the early1980s created the SolidarityFund. The concept was <strong>to</strong> poolFTQ members retirement savings<strong>to</strong>gether <strong>and</strong> invest in small <strong>and</strong>medium sized companies in theprovince that had problems raisingcapital. In fact, the SolidarityFund manages over $3 billion inassets, <strong>and</strong> is credited with savingor creating more than 75,000jobs since its creation. Thestrength of the fund is the grassrootssupport it gets from unionmembers, <strong>and</strong> that has allowedthe fund <strong>to</strong> grow <strong>to</strong> its currentsize.FTQWhat makes this type ofinvestment fund unique, <strong>and</strong>beneficial <strong>to</strong> workers <strong>and</strong> unions,is that these funds have anagreed upon set of progressiveprinciples <strong>to</strong> ensure union participation.Thus, before investmentsare made, a social audit is done<strong>to</strong> examine a company’s ethicalpractices, its labour relations his<strong>to</strong>ry,product safety st<strong>and</strong>ards,<strong>and</strong> environmentalresponsibility. The WorkingOpportunity Fund inBritish Columbia hasrejected more than a thous<strong>and</strong>firms for investmentbecause they did not meetthe proper criteria set outby unions in the province.This system has the dualeffect of weeding out undesirable<strong>and</strong> unfriendly companies,while also making someof these companies reform theirbusiness practices in order <strong>to</strong> beeligible for funding in the future.At the present time, LSIF’saccount for approximately 50percent of the available venturecapital in Canada. In addition <strong>to</strong>British Columbia <strong>and</strong> Quebec,there are now such funds in NewBrunswick (<strong>Workers</strong> InvestmentFund), Ontario (First OntarioFund) <strong>and</strong> Mani<strong>to</strong>ba (CrocusFund). Although most LSIF’shave direct union participationon the Board, it is not m<strong>and</strong>a<strong>to</strong>ryfor the funds <strong>to</strong> invest only inunionized companies. However,there is a built-in expectationthat the labour relations climatebe amenable <strong>to</strong> union organizing.According <strong>to</strong> Fern<strong>and</strong> Daous<strong>to</strong>f the Solidarity Fund “whenthese firms seek funding fromSolidarity, they are well awarethat we are a fund controlled bythe Quebec Federation ofLabour. They underst<strong>and</strong> that inaccepting investment from us,they are opening themselves upfor labour involvement, whichincludes unionization if that isthe wish of their employees.”Indeed, when Heinz Canadaacquired the Borden Foods pasta<strong>and</strong> sauce facility in Montreal in2001, BCTGM Local 227teamed with the Solidarity Funds<strong>to</strong> work with the company <strong>to</strong>ensure that when the sauce productionwas moved out ofMontreal, new jobs on the pastaside would be added. The relationshipbetween the union, theFunds, <strong>and</strong> the company allowedthis <strong>to</strong> happen.Labour-sponsored investmentfunds are but one mechanismCanadian unions have at theirdisposal when dealing with companiesthey are trying <strong>to</strong> organize,or they are trying <strong>to</strong> keep inthe community. The success ofLSIF’s in Canada has spurred thecreation of similar entities in theU.S. However, it is important <strong>to</strong>ensure that unions control thefunds <strong>and</strong> use a social audit <strong>to</strong>determine where <strong>to</strong> place theirvaluable assets.12BCTGM News
Legal Service FAQUnion Plus Legal ServiceQ: Who is eligible for the BCTGMPower Union Plus Legal Service?A: BCTGM members <strong>and</strong> their spouses<strong>and</strong> dependents are eligible <strong>to</strong> participate inthis program.Q: How much will I save on other legalmatters?A: Some legal matters, such as closing amortgage loan, may require further attentionfrom your at<strong>to</strong>rney. For such matters, you willreceive a 30 percent discount off the at<strong>to</strong>rney’snormal fee. Also, discounted flat fees may beavailable for some common services such asdrafting a will. The discount may be smallerfor contingency fee or percentage fee cases.The discount does not apply <strong>to</strong> ownership oroperation of a business.Q: What’s the value of the BCTGMPower Union Plus Legal Service <strong>to</strong> theaverage union member?A: If you’re like most people, you may notknow where <strong>to</strong> turn when you need an at<strong>to</strong>rney.Or you may be afraid that you can’tafford one. The Union Plus Legal Servicehelps you get the legal advice you need so youcan avoid <strong>and</strong> resolve potential legal problems,often for little or no cost.Q: What is not covered under theservice?A: Because this is a union program, mattersinvolving a union-related organization orunion official are not h<strong>and</strong>led by the service.Matters involving your ownership or operationof a business are not covered. Documentswritten by you, such as contracts, rental agreements,etc., are not covered by the free documentre<strong>view</strong> benefit. Participating at<strong>to</strong>rneysare not obligated <strong>to</strong> take a case <strong>and</strong> maydecline if they so choose.Q: How often can I talk <strong>to</strong> an at<strong>to</strong>rney?A: You may consult with an at<strong>to</strong>rney asmany times as you need <strong>to</strong>, provided it isabout a separate matter each time.Q: How is quality legal service ensured?A: Union Plus Legal Service at<strong>to</strong>rneys arecarefully selected <strong>to</strong> make sure you receive thebest service available. All participating at<strong>to</strong>rneysare in active practice, with an average of14 years of experience. Union leaders or membershave recommended many of them <strong>to</strong> thisprogram. At<strong>to</strong>rneys must go through an extensivere<strong>view</strong> process <strong>and</strong> must carry malpracticeinsurance.The program continuously moni<strong>to</strong>rs participatingat<strong>to</strong>rneys, <strong>and</strong> you will have theopportunity <strong>to</strong> complete a simple evaluationabout your at<strong>to</strong>rney’s performance. A programadministra<strong>to</strong>r re<strong>view</strong>s all evaluations. Theadministra<strong>to</strong>r also keeps track of any complaintsfiled by members against participatingat<strong>to</strong>rneys. If an at<strong>to</strong>rney does not measure up<strong>to</strong> our performance st<strong>and</strong>ards, UnionPrivilege, the organization founded by theAFL-CIO <strong>to</strong> develop <strong>and</strong> manage member benefits,can have that at<strong>to</strong>rney dismissed fromthe panel.For more information on the Union Plus Legal Service call 1-888-993-8886To find a lawyer online, visit http://www.unionprivilege.org/benefits/legal/find.cfmMarch/April 2002 www.bctgm.org 13