Milest<strong>on</strong>e White Paper<str<strong>on</strong>g>Keeping</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Watch</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong>: <strong>IP</strong> <strong>Video</strong> <strong>Surveillance</strong>— A guide for public officials <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> advantages of <strong>IP</strong> video surveillance for metropolitan surveillance.Who’s doing itMetropolitan applicati<strong>on</strong>s of video surveillance are growing around <strong>the</strong>world. The French transportati<strong>on</strong> system, for instance, uses videosurveillance <strong>on</strong> streets to regulate traffic flows, detect traffic jams, andto observe roadside disturbances. In Paris, <strong>the</strong> Metro has installed2,500 video cameras <strong>on</strong> municipal buses to identify criminal acts as<strong>the</strong>y occur. A similar video surveillance system is operating <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>nati<strong>on</strong>al rapid transit (RATP). It has been resp<strong>on</strong>sible for detecting83% of all criminal incidents. 2 The result has been a noticeable declinein petty crime.Britain, of course, leads <strong>the</strong> world in video surveillance. The UK has<strong>on</strong>e percent of world's populati<strong>on</strong>, but 20% of its surveillance cameras.L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong> has 6,000 cameras in <strong>the</strong> Underground (its subway system)al<strong>on</strong>e. Elsewhere in Europe, <strong>the</strong> Spanish Interior Minister has installedvideo surveillance equipment in public areas in <strong>the</strong> Basque regi<strong>on</strong> in aneffort to combat street violence and politically motivated vandalism.Italy is using video surveillance in public areas and governmentbuildings in Rome, <strong>the</strong> Vatican, and o<strong>the</strong>r high profile tourist areas. InCopenhagen, politicians and police alike have increased calls for morevideo surveillance after a video surveillance system enabled police toquickly arrest three suspects shortly after a stabbing death in January2008. According to Per Larsen, Copenhagen police operati<strong>on</strong>s chief(quoted in The Copenhagen Post, January 15, 2008), “<strong>Video</strong>recordings are <strong>the</strong> ultimate source of evidence.”Even smaller cities are seeing <strong>the</strong> value of video surveillance. The cityof Wodzislaw Slaski in Poland now has an <strong>IP</strong> video surveillance systemthat <strong>the</strong> city says has improved <strong>the</strong> safety of citizens and reduced roadoffenses in <strong>the</strong> city’s traffic.Metropolitan video surveillance is also growing in <strong>the</strong> United States. InJuly 2007, New York <strong>City</strong> officials, for example, unveiled <strong>the</strong> LowerManhattan Security Initiative. Modeled after L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong>’s “Ring of Steel,”this initiative includes 3000 new surveillance cameras, automatedroadblocks, and license plate readers. Chicago is following suit with560 anti-crime cameras already deployed <strong>on</strong> city streets. It revealedplans in September 2007 to add a sophisticated video analytic systemthat will detect aband<strong>on</strong>ed bags, suspicious behaviors (e.g., a vehiclecircling a key building), and vehicles sought by police.In Baltimore, a program called Citi<str<strong>on</strong>g>Watch</str<strong>on</strong>g> includes a state-of-<strong>the</strong>-artcentral c<strong>on</strong>trol center m<strong>on</strong>itoring nearly 400 cameras. Most aremounted atop streetlight poles and provide c<strong>on</strong>tinuous surveillance indowntown tourist areas, some of <strong>the</strong> city's most violentneighborhoods, and five of <strong>the</strong> city's public housing projects. On <strong>the</strong>West Coast, Los Angeles uses surveillance cameras <strong>on</strong> its Metro Railsystem, in city buildings, and <strong>on</strong> various freeways and busyintersecti<strong>on</strong>s.2Nieto, Marcus, “Public <strong>Video</strong> <strong>Surveillance</strong>: Is It An Effective Crime Preventi<strong>on</strong> Tool?”,California Research Bureau (1997).Page 4
Milest<strong>on</strong>e White Paper<str<strong>on</strong>g>Keeping</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Watch</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong>: <strong>IP</strong> <strong>Video</strong> <strong>Surveillance</strong>— A guide for public officials <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> advantages of <strong>IP</strong> video surveillance for metropolitan surveillance.Popular with <strong>the</strong> publicDespite fears of a “Big Bro<strong>the</strong>r is watching you” attitude from <strong>the</strong>public, research shows people are generally positive towards videosurveillance in public places. An 2007 ABC News/Washingt<strong>on</strong> Post Pollshowed that by almost a 3-to-1 margin, Americans support <strong>the</strong>increased use of surveillance cameras in public places. In 1999 <strong>the</strong>Crime Preventi<strong>on</strong> Council (Det Kriminalpræventive Råd) and DanishGallup c<strong>on</strong>ducted a teleph<strong>on</strong>e survey questi<strong>on</strong>naire with 514 randomlyselected resp<strong>on</strong>dents. The results indicated that an overwhelmingmajority are positive to video surveillance of public spaces where <strong>on</strong>eis already “publicly visible.” Resp<strong>on</strong>dents indicated that surveillancemakes <strong>on</strong>e feel more secure.Public acceptance of video surveillance skyrocketed in Britain after <strong>the</strong>murder of toddler James Bulger near Liverpool in 1993. In surveillancefootage that shocked <strong>the</strong> country, <strong>the</strong> killers, a pair of 10-year-oldboys, were shown leading <strong>the</strong> trusting 2-year-old away from ashopping center. The boys were so<strong>on</strong> caught and <strong>the</strong> video clearlyillustrated <strong>the</strong> value of surveillance in public areas.Page 5