12.07.2015 Views

Habitat Assessment of the Pacific Sideband (Monadenia fidelis) In ...

Habitat Assessment of the Pacific Sideband (Monadenia fidelis) In ...

Habitat Assessment of the Pacific Sideband (Monadenia fidelis) In ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>Sideband</strong> 93.1 Number ObservedFrom <strong>the</strong> 159 plots a total <strong>of</strong> 154 live snails and 49 shells were observed. Counts <strong>of</strong> livesnails per plots ranged from 0 to 5 while shell counts per plot ranged from 0 to 3. Aspreviously mentioned, <strong>the</strong>se counts are not considered to be an accurate representation <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> individuals or shells per plot. Large numbers <strong>of</strong> live or dead snails werenot found within a given plot, but within larger areas or similar habitat types severaldozen or more were <strong>of</strong>ten observed. This result is consistent with our general fieldobservations working throughout <strong>the</strong> Fraser Valley. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong>observations <strong>of</strong> multiple live snails occurred during known breeding times.3.2 VegetationData on <strong>the</strong> vascular vegetation present at each site were collected. Tree and shrubspecies were well inventoried, but herbaceous species were limited to commonoccurrences and do not represent <strong>the</strong> true diversity <strong>of</strong> species. Moss and lichens were notinventoried. Due to <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> field survey, <strong>the</strong> following results were influencedby seasonal changes which affected <strong>the</strong> number and type <strong>of</strong> herbaceous species recorded.3.2.1 Forest CoverThe forest cover <strong>of</strong> 77 plots was estimated (Table 1). Broadleaf forest and mixed forestsaccounted for 61.0% and 25.9% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plots while coniferous forests were only found in9.1% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plots. A variety <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r forest cover types comprised <strong>the</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>plots.Table 1. Forest CoverForest Cover # Plots PercentShrubs 2 2.6Mixed Forest 20 25.9Wetland 0 0.0Broadleaf Forest 47 61.0Exposed Soil 0 0.0Herbs/Grass 1 1.3Coniferous Forest 7 9.1TOTAL 773.2.2 Stand AgeThe estimated forest stand age was recorded for 77 plots. Young forests accounted for79.2% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plots while mature forests accounted for 14.3%. Tall shrubs and saplingswere found in 3.9% and 2.6% respectively.This data is likely skewed towards younger stands as <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plots werelocated within, or in close proximity too, urban areas where mature stands areuncommon.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!