Beyond Common Sense - LaRouche

Such a claim will help fund-raising efforts in the bible belts ofrural Australia. But it is basically a fraudulent statement.LaRouche’s economics far from having a Christian source, actuallyderive from the “atheistic” Marxist concept of the rate of surplusvalue. The bills were based on the work of the former CECmember, John Simpson and LaRouche principles had nothing todo with the bills.LaRouche’s idea on the stages of history which are nowgenatural law” and “Christian” are merely a rejigged notionof the Hegelian-Marxist dialectical process. Like LaRouche’spsycho-political approach, his economics are Marxist ininspiration.CEC political activity is now narrow focused and restricted topublication of provocative articles attacking the designated enemy,invariably British-Venetian oligarchies and their freemasonicintelligenceagents. Most organisational time is taken up inpsychological training and making contacts for fundraising, newcandidates for “unblocking.” The LaRouche-CEC has shunnedmoney making opportunities that might be politically beneficial,’butfail to provide opportunities for cadre training.A “Stink-Bomb” Led Renaissance?The techniques employed of political action in the communityrarely rise beyond a “stink-bomb” approach: releasing a pig at aKissinger meeting; disrupting a Conrad Black dinner, distributinga thousand provocative pamphlets.Like individual psychotherapy where an immediate goal is toprovoke an angry response, LaRouche forces attempt to provokean angry response in the wider community.The stink-bomb approach to politics means that the LaRouche-CEC targets designated enemies (the B’nai B’rith is a favourite)and invokes a nuisance campaign, like a foolhardy boy poking astick into an ant nest. Naturally, this draws a hostile responsefrom the target: a hostile media campaign, a