Immunogenicity and Setting Cut Points

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Specific inhibition as representedby positive controlsUninhibitedInhibitedThe degree of inhibition is reproducibleThe travel of the switch is predictable.38
Non-specific inhibition asrepresented by antibody negativesamplesENCIBreak 1Break 2The response (enhancement or inhibition) is typically r<strong>and</strong>om39
Page 1 and 2: Immunogenicity and SettingCut Point
Page 3 and 4: Screening Cut Point• Definition:
Page 8 and 9: But 5% of the time we hit something
Page 11 and 12: Upper BalconiesHigh PCMiddle Balcon
Page 13 and 14: Upper BalconiesHigh PCMiddle Balcon
Page 15 and 16: Assay Background has 2 VariationCom
Page 17 and 18: Balanced Design for ValidationExper
Page 19 and 20: Balanced Design - includesinhibitor
Page 21 and 22: Types of Screening Cut Points• Fi
Page 23 and 24: Types of Screening Cut Points• Dy
Page 25 and 26: Screening CP Evaluation Flow-Scheme
Page 27 and 28: Distribution & OutliersOriginal Dat
Page 29 and 30: Distribution and OutliersRun 1 Log
Page 31 and 32: How the SD should be calculate?•
Page 33 and 34: Fixed or Floating?Log OD-1-21 2 3 4
Page 35 and 36: Floating Cut PointAdditive or Multi
Page 37: Switches and Balls• The specific
Page 41 and 42: Setting LimitsLowPositiveControlLar
Page 43 and 44: Confirmation Cut PointexampleIndivi
Page 45 and 46: Confirmation Cut PointexampleAll Da
Page 47 and 48: Acknowledgements• Wendell Smith,

Immunogenicity and Setting Cut Points

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?