Aboriginal people and the law - Legal Information Access Centre
Aboriginal people and the law - Legal Information Access Centre
Aboriginal people and the law - Legal Information Access Centre
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
64 The Law H<strong>and</strong>bookpublic which do not prevent <strong>Aboriginal</strong><strong>people</strong> having reasonable access to <strong>the</strong>irl<strong>and</strong> are valid. Native title is not extinguishedby <strong>the</strong> act, <strong>and</strong> compensation ispayable. Native title holders have <strong>the</strong>same procedural rights as o<strong>the</strong>r titleholders in relation to such acts (s 24KA).• Certain “low impact” future acts are validif <strong>the</strong>y occur before a determination thatnative title exists. Native title is notextinguished by those acts (s 24LA).• O<strong>the</strong>r categories of future acts mustcomply with <strong>the</strong> “freehold title test”(s 24MA), which generally means that anact is valid if it could be done if <strong>the</strong> nativetitle holders held freehold title. It doesnot apply to offshore areas. Native titleholders have additional procedural rightsin certain compulsory acquisition matters(s 24MD(6B)).• Acts in offshore places are valid. Exceptin <strong>the</strong> case of compulsory acquisitions,native title is not extinguished. Nativetitle holders have <strong>the</strong> same proceduralrights as o<strong>the</strong>r title holders (s 24NA).• A special right to negotiate applies tofuture acts involving <strong>the</strong> grant of certainmining interests <strong>and</strong> compulsory acquisitions(ss 25–44).Native title can be validly extinguishedunder <strong>the</strong> future act regime, for examplewhere native title rights <strong>and</strong> interests aresubject to compulsory acquisition, but generally<strong>the</strong> non-extinguishment principleapplies, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> native title holders areentitled to compensation for <strong>the</strong> impairmentof native title. In some cases, <strong>the</strong> future actwill be valid notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing that <strong>the</strong> proceduralrequirements might not be observed(for example, under s 24KA – Lardil Peoples vQueensl<strong>and</strong> [2001] FCA 414; (2001) 108 FCR453).Hunting, ga<strong>the</strong>ring <strong>and</strong> fishingThe Act provides for <strong>the</strong> preservation ofhunting, ga<strong>the</strong>ring <strong>and</strong> fishing rights, <strong>and</strong>cultural activities as long as <strong>the</strong>y are noncommercial<strong>and</strong> amount to <strong>the</strong> exercise ofnative title interests. These activities mayoccur even if a licence is required for suchactivities by non-native title holders (s 211<strong>and</strong> Yanner v Eaton (1999) 201 CLR 351).The High Court has confirmed that acoastal grant of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> l<strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong>Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Territory stretches to <strong>the</strong> lowwater mark <strong>and</strong> includes <strong>the</strong> intertidal zone.Significantly, coastal native title holders in<strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Territory have a right toexclude o<strong>the</strong>rs from an <strong>Aboriginal</strong> intertidalzone. Recognition of this right greatly enhances<strong>the</strong> negotiating power of native titleholders regarding public access to <strong>the</strong> intertidalzone <strong>and</strong> commercial interests in thosenatural resources (Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Territory v ArnhemL<strong>and</strong> <strong>Aboriginal</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Trust (2008) 248ALR 195 (Blue Mud Bay case)). The case didnot consider <strong>the</strong> status of grants under o<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong> rights legislation. In NSW, grants madeunder <strong>the</strong> <strong>Aboriginal</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Rights Act willonly extend to <strong>the</strong> limits of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> claimed,which is usually defined by <strong>the</strong> depositedplan, but may extend to <strong>the</strong> mean highwater mark. Where native title is recognisedin coastal waters, <strong>the</strong> right will be subject to<strong>the</strong> general public right to fish <strong>and</strong> of safenavigation, <strong>and</strong> native title will not beexclusive: Commonwealth v Yarmirr [2001]HCA 56; (2001) 208 CLR 1.[2.390] Resource <strong>law</strong>A number of <strong>law</strong>s regulate <strong>the</strong> protection,use, exploitation <strong>and</strong> management of naturalresources in NSW. Many of <strong>the</strong>m makespecial provision for <strong>the</strong> involvement of<strong>Aboriginal</strong> <strong>people</strong>.[2.400] FishingThe Fisheries Management Act 1994 (NSW)states that it is not intended to affect nativetitle rights (s 287). An amendment in 2000 tointroduce a general salt water recreational