12.07.2015 Views

Aboriginal people and the law - Legal Information Access Centre

Aboriginal people and the law - Legal Information Access Centre

Aboriginal people and the law - Legal Information Access Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64 The Law H<strong>and</strong>bookpublic which do not prevent <strong>Aboriginal</strong><strong>people</strong> having reasonable access to <strong>the</strong>irl<strong>and</strong> are valid. Native title is not extinguishedby <strong>the</strong> act, <strong>and</strong> compensation ispayable. Native title holders have <strong>the</strong>same procedural rights as o<strong>the</strong>r titleholders in relation to such acts (s 24KA).• Certain “low impact” future acts are validif <strong>the</strong>y occur before a determination thatnative title exists. Native title is notextinguished by those acts (s 24LA).• O<strong>the</strong>r categories of future acts mustcomply with <strong>the</strong> “freehold title test”(s 24MA), which generally means that anact is valid if it could be done if <strong>the</strong> nativetitle holders held freehold title. It doesnot apply to offshore areas. Native titleholders have additional procedural rightsin certain compulsory acquisition matters(s 24MD(6B)).• Acts in offshore places are valid. Exceptin <strong>the</strong> case of compulsory acquisitions,native title is not extinguished. Nativetitle holders have <strong>the</strong> same proceduralrights as o<strong>the</strong>r title holders (s 24NA).• A special right to negotiate applies tofuture acts involving <strong>the</strong> grant of certainmining interests <strong>and</strong> compulsory acquisitions(ss 25–44).Native title can be validly extinguishedunder <strong>the</strong> future act regime, for examplewhere native title rights <strong>and</strong> interests aresubject to compulsory acquisition, but generally<strong>the</strong> non-extinguishment principleapplies, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> native title holders areentitled to compensation for <strong>the</strong> impairmentof native title. In some cases, <strong>the</strong> future actwill be valid notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing that <strong>the</strong> proceduralrequirements might not be observed(for example, under s 24KA – Lardil Peoples vQueensl<strong>and</strong> [2001] FCA 414; (2001) 108 FCR453).Hunting, ga<strong>the</strong>ring <strong>and</strong> fishingThe Act provides for <strong>the</strong> preservation ofhunting, ga<strong>the</strong>ring <strong>and</strong> fishing rights, <strong>and</strong>cultural activities as long as <strong>the</strong>y are noncommercial<strong>and</strong> amount to <strong>the</strong> exercise ofnative title interests. These activities mayoccur even if a licence is required for suchactivities by non-native title holders (s 211<strong>and</strong> Yanner v Eaton (1999) 201 CLR 351).The High Court has confirmed that acoastal grant of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> l<strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong>Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Territory stretches to <strong>the</strong> lowwater mark <strong>and</strong> includes <strong>the</strong> intertidal zone.Significantly, coastal native title holders in<strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Territory have a right toexclude o<strong>the</strong>rs from an <strong>Aboriginal</strong> intertidalzone. Recognition of this right greatly enhances<strong>the</strong> negotiating power of native titleholders regarding public access to <strong>the</strong> intertidalzone <strong>and</strong> commercial interests in thosenatural resources (Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Territory v ArnhemL<strong>and</strong> <strong>Aboriginal</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Trust (2008) 248ALR 195 (Blue Mud Bay case)). The case didnot consider <strong>the</strong> status of grants under o<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong> rights legislation. In NSW, grants madeunder <strong>the</strong> <strong>Aboriginal</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Rights Act willonly extend to <strong>the</strong> limits of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> claimed,which is usually defined by <strong>the</strong> depositedplan, but may extend to <strong>the</strong> mean highwater mark. Where native title is recognisedin coastal waters, <strong>the</strong> right will be subject to<strong>the</strong> general public right to fish <strong>and</strong> of safenavigation, <strong>and</strong> native title will not beexclusive: Commonwealth v Yarmirr [2001]HCA 56; (2001) 208 CLR 1.[2.390] Resource <strong>law</strong>A number of <strong>law</strong>s regulate <strong>the</strong> protection,use, exploitation <strong>and</strong> management of naturalresources in NSW. Many of <strong>the</strong>m makespecial provision for <strong>the</strong> involvement of<strong>Aboriginal</strong> <strong>people</strong>.[2.400] FishingThe Fisheries Management Act 1994 (NSW)states that it is not intended to affect nativetitle rights (s 287). An amendment in 2000 tointroduce a general salt water recreational

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!