Workshop Report March 2011 Budva ... - Renanetwork.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Training Evaluation FormAnnex 5POST-WORKSHOP EVALUATIONFULL TITLE OF THE TRAINING: RENA WG2 CLIMATE CHANGEActivity 4.2.1 The EU Climate and Energy Package (Focus on Effort Sharing, Renewables andCCS)1. Statistical InformationLOCATION OF THE TRAINING: Budva, MontenegroDATES: 21 – 22 March 2011.1.1 Workshop Session Regional workshop1.2 Trainer Name Imre Csikos/ Zsolt Lengyel/Davor Vešligaj/ Peter J.Kalaš/ Wytze van der Gaast/1.3 Name and Surname ofParticipants (evaluators)As per participants’ list.2. Your ExpectationsPlease indicate to what extent specific expectations were met, or not met:My ExpectationsMy expectations were metFully Partially Not at all1. Sharing9 2experience/information2. CCS system and Renewables 8 23. Rate between practical and 1 3technical issues4. Overview of RENA 13. Workshop and PresentationPlease rate the following statements in respect of this training module:Aspect of Workshop Excellent Good Average Acceptable Poor Unacceptable1 The workshop achieved the 7 10 1 1 1objectives set2 The quality of the workshop 5 7 1 1 2material given to me was of a highstandard3 The content of the workshop was 4 11 4 1well suited to my level ofunderstanding and experience4 The practical work was relevant 5 8 3 1 1and informative5 The workshop was interactive 4 12 2 16. The mix between theory andpractise allowed sufficientopportunity to implement acquired3 8 5 1 226
Training Evaluation Formknowledge and skillsAspect of Workshop Excellent Good Average Acceptable Poor Unacceptable7 Trainers were well prepared and 9 9 1 1knowledgeable on the subject matter8 The duration of this workshop 4 9 5 1was neither too long nor too short9 The logistical arrangements 13 4 1 2(venue, refreshments, equipment)were satisfactory10 Attending this workshop wastime well spent10 8 24. Comments and suggestionsI have the following comment and/or suggestions in addition to questions already answered:Workshop Sessions: Well organized (2), Very useful experience (3), High standard (1), Day 1overwhelming in terms of information received (1) .More balanced approach in relationship of more and less demanding presentations andbetter distribution of presentations (2),Trainers: Excellent performance (6), Satisfactory (1)Workshop level and content: Very good in all its content, regarding the issues discussed andinformation received (2),Well organized (4), More best practices examples (2), Content more appropriate to the needs of RENAcountries (1).Other:1) Increased stakeholder participation.2) Develop concrete project in the future (2).3) Ensure continuation4) Materials for discussion (e.g. Roadmap 2050, EU Energy and Climate Package) provided5) Obstacles/Opportunities/Future steps6) Selection of a less expensive hotel.27
Page 1 and 2: The European Union’s Instrument f
Page 3 and 4: Workshop Report on the EU Climate a
Page 20 and 21: Training Evaluation Form12:15 - 13:
Page 22 and 23: Training Evaluation Form13. Regulat
Page 24 and 25: Training Evaluation Form37. ‘ALTE
Page 26 and 27: Training Evaluation Formand to help

Workshop Report March 2011 Budva ... - Renanetwork.org

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?