28.11.2012 Views

Journal of Dental Research - Washington Action for Safe Water

Journal of Dental Research - Washington Action for Safe Water

Journal of Dental Research - Washington Action for Safe Water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J Dent Res 82(11) 2003 Fluoride and Tooth Crystal 911<br />

Table 1. Descriptive Data from Montreal, Toronto, and Fortaleza<br />

and width <strong>of</strong> the dentin<br />

crystallites were 177 Å<br />

(+ 31 Å) and 70 Å (+ 18<br />

Å), respectively. Sixtyone<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

samples analyzed came<br />

from patients who had<br />

always lived in the city<br />

where the teeth were<br />

extracted. More than<br />

90% <strong>of</strong> the analyzed<br />

teeth came from patients<br />

who had lived in the<br />

area <strong>of</strong> tooth collection<br />

<strong>for</strong> more than 5 yrs<br />

(covering the majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> the period in which<br />

the 3rd molars were<br />

being <strong>for</strong>med). Table 1<br />

presents the data<br />

divided by location.<br />

Enamel F concentrations<br />

in teeth col-<br />

F Concentration (ppm) Crystallite Size (Å)<br />

Enamel Dentin Enamel Long Axis Enamel Short Axis Dentin Long Axis Dentin Short Axis<br />

Location N Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) N<br />

Montreal 24 132.5 (55.1) 24 197.8 ( 77.8) 24 236 (39) 24 163 (30) 24 176 (31) 24 71 (24) 24<br />

Toronto 23 198.6 (77.5) 23 322.6 (159.1) 22 243 (44) 23 179 (42) 23 170 (32) 23 64 ( 7) 23<br />

Fortaleza 53 149.4 (99.2) 51 398.7 (177.3) 53 284 (67) 37 208 (48) 37 183 (31) 52 73 (19) 52<br />

Total 100 156.8 (88) 98 333.1 (174.3) 99 259 (58) 84 187 (46) 84 178 (31) 99 70 (19) 99<br />

Table 2. Summary <strong>of</strong> One-way ANOVA<br />

ANOVA Post hoc<br />

Dependent Variable F Sig. (I) Location (J) Location Mean Difference (I-J) Sig.<br />

Enamel long axis 6.038 0.004 LSD Montreal Toronto - 6.61 0.676<br />

Fortaleza -43.04 0.003<br />

Toronto Montreal 6.61 0.676<br />

Fortaleza -36.43 0.011<br />

Fortaleza Montreal 43.04 0.003<br />

Toronto 36.43 0.011<br />

Enamel short axis 7.780 0.001 LSD Montreal Toronto -15.11 0.218<br />

cross-section Fortaleza -40.81 0.000<br />

Toronto Montreal 15.11 0.218<br />

Fortaleza -25.69 0.020<br />

Fortaleza Montreal 40.81 0.000<br />

Toronto 25.69 0.020<br />

Dentin long axis 1.147 0.322<br />

Dentin short axis 1.441 0.242<br />

cross-section<br />

lected in Toronto were significantly higher than those in teeth<br />

from Montreal (p = 0.009) and Fortaleza (p = 0.024). Dentin F<br />

concentrations were significantly lower in Montreal compared<br />

with Toronto (p = 0.008) and Fortaleza (p < 0.001). Enamel<br />

crystallite length was significantly greater in teeth from<br />

Fortaleza than in those from Toronto (p = 0.011) and Montreal<br />

(p = 0.003), while enamel crystallite width was significantly<br />

greater in teeth from Fortaleza when compared with that in<br />

teeth collected from Toronto (p = 0.020) and Montreal (p <<br />

0.001). No difference in the dentin crystallite size was seen in<br />

the 3 different communities. A summary <strong>of</strong> the one-way<br />

ANOVA analysis is presented in Table 2. There was also<br />

positive correlation between dentin F concentration and enamel<br />

crystallite length (r s = 0.405; p < 0.001) and width (r s = 0.483;<br />

p < 0.001).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

This is the first study to present data on hydroxyapatite<br />

crystallite size and on F concentration in dentin <strong>of</strong> unerupted<br />

third molars from areas with different drinking water F<br />

concentrations. Only teeth with completed or almost completed<br />

roots were utilized, because <strong>of</strong> the possible effect that tooth<br />

maturation might have on crystal size. Additionally, the use <strong>of</strong><br />

a single type <strong>of</strong> tooth avoided problems that may be associated<br />

with the variation in F content between different tooth types<br />

(Aasenden et al., 1973). Unerupted third molars were chosen<br />

because they are more easily collected (commonly extracted)<br />

and have not been exposed to the oral environment (thus<br />

avoiding topical F exposure).<br />

Teeth from 3 different areas were collected. Optimal F<br />

levels in drinking water are usually adjusted <strong>for</strong> the annual<br />

average maximum daily air temperature (AAMDAT) and the<br />

relationship between average temperature and water intake<br />

(Galagan and Vermillion, 1957; PHS, 1962; National <strong>Research</strong><br />

Council, 1993). Based on this, Toronto (AAMDAT between<br />

14.7 and 17.7°C) and Fortaleza (AAMDAT between 26.3 and<br />

32.5°C) are considered to have optimum F levels in their<br />

drinking water.<br />

This study showed that dentin F concentrations were<br />

significantly higher in teeth collected in Toronto and Fortaleza<br />

compared with those collected in Montreal, while enamel F<br />

concentrations were higher in teeth from Toronto when<br />

compared with teeth from Fortaleza and Montreal. These<br />

results were expected, since previous work has shown that the<br />

enamel <strong>of</strong> unerupted third molars has significantly less F<br />

concentration in areas where there are low levels <strong>of</strong> F in the<br />

drinking water (Mestriner et al., 1996).<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the data presented also showed that enamel<br />

crystallite size was greater (length and width) in teeth coming<br />

Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com by guest on April 8, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.<br />

International and American Associations <strong>for</strong> <strong>Dental</strong> <strong>Research</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!