12.07.2015 Views

here - Political Prisoners in Thailand

here - Political Prisoners in Thailand

here - Political Prisoners in Thailand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[page 15]...to Her Majesty the Queen and that His Majesty the K<strong>in</strong>g and Her Majesty theQueen were beh<strong>in</strong>d and supported Gen. Prem <strong>in</strong> the coup of 19 September 2006.A fifth passage from the defendant’s speech conta<strong>in</strong>ed the follow<strong>in</strong>g[:] “We shouldbe prepared as today will be the last battle for us, who are prodemocracy. Will weallow the rul<strong>in</strong>g class of only a few people to cont<strong>in</strong>ue to keep the people down ornot? Brothers and sisters. If you [the rul<strong>in</strong>g class] want to be good rulers, you willhave to choose whether you will be like the Japanese, English or Russian [rul<strong>in</strong>gclasses]. [Would you like] your entire family to be shot down [like the Russianroyal family] or beheaded with the Guillot<strong>in</strong>e like the French [royal family]? Orlike <strong>in</strong> Nepal w<strong>here</strong> the people rose up and shot the whole family. But today, thepeople have no other alternative besides fight<strong>in</strong>g.” This passage made theaudience understand that government under the Constitutional Monarchy isunjust and suppresses and abuses the people, and that [the royal family] shouldbe beheaded by the Guillot<strong>in</strong>e as <strong>in</strong> France. The words [“]bang bang[”] imply that[the Royal Family] ought to be shot down which is a threat to the Head of Stategovern<strong>in</strong>g under the Constitutional Monarchy. By mention<strong>in</strong>g these examples, thedefandent threatened the monarchy of <strong>Thailand</strong>, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that if they suppressand abuse the people, they will suffer the same fate as the monarchies of the othercountries that the defendant referred to <strong>in</strong> the speech. Pol. Lt. Col. Pornsak filedcharges to the <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g officer at Chana Songkhram Metropolitian PoliceStation to proceed with the case aga<strong>in</strong>st the defendant. Subsequently, t<strong>here</strong>trospective <strong>in</strong>vestigation of Pol. Lt. Col. Pornsak discovered that on 7 June 2008and on 13 June 2008 at around 11 pm, the defendant got on stage to speak atSanam Luang and that some parts of the speech were <strong>in</strong>sult<strong>in</strong>g to His Majesty theK<strong>in</strong>g that is on 7 June 2008 the defendant said the follow<strong>in</strong>g[:] “I tell you, hey,I’m the mother of Sondhi Limthongkul. The letter he claimed the other day camefrom the Mother was from me. Water from the sky – what sky? Chitralada[bottled] water. [page 16]I can buy it. Sondhi..., you bastard. My goodness, you keep talk<strong>in</strong>g about waterfrom the sky. I tell you, we always have ra<strong>in</strong> water to dr<strong>in</strong>k. Doesn’t ra<strong>in</strong> watercome from the sky? T<strong>here</strong>fore, don’t you br<strong>in</strong>g up a yellow or blue collar. I nevercare. If you encounter a Red Shirt, you will be damned. Don’t you forget, youbastard Alliance of Evil, only the people rule <strong>in</strong> the country. T<strong>here</strong> is no one morepowerful than the people. Right, my brothers and sisters? Why do I say this? Whopays the taxes? Isn’t it because of the patronage of commoners that feudalismrema<strong>in</strong>s?” The aforementioned passage made the audience understand that thewords [“]blue[”] and [“]Chitralada[”] referred to Chitralada Palace and the words140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!