194 SUPERHERO THE EVOLUTION OF THE SUPERHERO1953. Bronze Age: Certain formal and stylistic details embellish theform. (Superman #233, 1971, Kryptonite neutralized, Superman’spowers halved; to Legion <strong>of</strong> Super-Heroes #259, 1980, Superboyquits the Legion <strong>of</strong> Super-Heroes.)4. Iron Age: <strong>The</strong> form and its embellishments are accented to thepoint where they themselves become the “substance” or “content”<strong>of</strong> the work. (DC Comics Presents #26, 1980, the first appearance<strong>of</strong> the New Teen Titans; to Justice League <strong>of</strong> America #261, 1987,end <strong>of</strong> the original JLA; and to Heroes Reborn/Heroes Return, 2000,Marvel’s failed attempt to imitate Image.)5 Renaissance Age: <strong>The</strong> conventions <strong>of</strong> the genre are reestablished.(Justice League #1, 1987, the debut <strong>of</strong> the reconstituted JusticeLeague; <strong>The</strong> Sentry #1, 2000, Marvel incorporates alternativecomics aesthetic.)<strong>The</strong> Evolutionary CycleThomas Schatz in Hollywood <strong>Genre</strong>s <strong>of</strong>fers a four stage evolutionarycycle that can be applied to nearly any genre:…a form passes through an experimentalstage, during which its conventionsare isolated and established, a classicstage, in which the conventions reachtheir “equilibrium” and are mutuallyunderstood <strong>by</strong> artist and audience, [astage] <strong>of</strong> refinement, during which certainformal and stylistic details embellish theform, and finally a baroque (or ‘mannerist’or ‘self-reflexive’) stage, when the formand its embellishments are accented tothe point where they themselves becomethe “substance” or “content” <strong>of</strong> the work(37-38).<strong>The</strong>se stages fit neatly with the ages <strong>of</strong> superhero comics:Golden, Silver, Bronze, and Iron. <strong>Genre</strong>, in this view, is a system<strong>of</strong> interaction between the producers and audiences <strong>of</strong> a mediumembodied in privileged story forms in which basic social conflicts arenarratively animated and resolved. <strong>Genre</strong>s evolve when the narrativeresolution <strong>of</strong> social conflict no longer holds true for the audience,which responds <strong>by</strong> not buying the product, which in turn leads theproducers to increase the level <strong>of</strong> complexity and self-consciousness<strong>of</strong> the story formulas and conventions to satisfy the audience. This“conversation” continues through the cycle <strong>of</strong> genre evolution untilit makes a complete round and a genre breaks down for both theproducers and the consumers. <strong>The</strong> conventions <strong>of</strong> the genre are thenreconstructed and the genre is made to work again (note—not everygenre runs smoothly or evenly through the cycle). 102This evolution occurs due to “both internal (formal) andexternal (cultural, thematic) factors” (36). External factors includelarge cultural movements that influence the way genre products arereceived <strong>by</strong> their audiences, especially in terms <strong>of</strong> sophistication,themes engaged, and character presentation. Internal factors reflectthe degree <strong>of</strong> formal transparency, that is the degree to which thegenre products transmit and reinforce the genre’s social message, i.e.its ideology. As a genre evolves, it moves from formal transparencyto opacity. In the beginning, “any stylistic flourishes or formal selfconsciousnesswill only impede the transmission <strong>of</strong> the message,” butas the creators and audience become more familiar and comfortablewith the conventions <strong>of</strong> the genre, experimentation occurs and theconventions are portrayed with increasing levels <strong>of</strong> complexity(38).We begin the genre cycle <strong>by</strong> looking through the form asrepresented in the genre’s conventions at the genre’s social message(transparency) and end <strong>by</strong> looking at those conventions (opacity) “toexamine and appreciate its structure and its cultural appeal” (38). Ingeneral, genres move from social to aesthetic concerns, althoughboth are present throughout the cycle.<strong>Genre</strong>, Parody, and Mini-cyclesAccording to Schatz, successful parody is a sign that the conventionsand straightforward message <strong>of</strong> a genre have saturated the audience,and this point <strong>of</strong> saturation comes at the end <strong>of</strong> a genre’s classicstage. Unsuccessful parody indicates that the audience is not yetfamiliar enough with the genre to appreciate the subversion <strong>of</strong> itsconventions. Thus, successful parody marks the point at which a
196 SUPERHERO THE EVOLUTION OF THE SUPERHERO197genre has fully been established and is well on the way to completingthe genre cycle. For superheroes this point came after just two and ahalf years in the November 1940 issue <strong>of</strong> All-American Comics (#20)with the Red Tornado’s appearance in Sheldon Mayer’s “Scribbly”feature.All-American Comics #21 © 1940 DC Comics. All Rights Reserved.<strong>The</strong> Red Tornado, or “Red Tomato” as she was called, is in realityMa Hunkel, a housewife who dresses in red longjohns with a stockpot for a helmet and takes up the fight against minor neighborhoodvillains. By this point comic books were full <strong>of</strong> superheroes, and theconventions <strong>of</strong> the genre must have been quickly absorbed <strong>by</strong> itsaudience for the Red Tornado to have worked.Another parody <strong>of</strong> the superhero genre appeared the next yearin Supersnipe.Supersnipe Comics #9 © 1942 Street and Smith.In his stories, Supersnipe was not an actual character but a fantasyprojection <strong>of</strong> Koppy McFad, the boy with the most comic booksin America. McFad had no superpowers, but dreamed himself intoadventures as Supersnipe. He was a genuine long-underwear herobecause as Koppy his costume was made from red longjohns and ablue towel, which inverts the color scheme <strong>of</strong> Superman’s costume.Supersnipe thus parodied both superheroes and their fans.<strong>The</strong> superhero genre could not have reached its refinement stagethis quickly. Instead, superhero comics can be seen as exhibitinga mini-cycle within each stage. Very soon after the beginning <strong>of</strong>a stage, the version <strong>of</strong> conventions developed therein saturate theaudience and become ripe for parody. Perhaps this ripeness arisesfrom the broad distribution <strong>of</strong> these conventions across adventuregenres, which means that the audience is already largely familiarwith them from other narrative forms; perhaps the genre is morelimited than other genres, and so the creators exhaust each stage’srange <strong>of</strong> possibilities for the conventions without evolving them tothe next stage.Parody developed quickly at each stage: the Silver Age saw theInferior Five at DC and Not Brand Ecch at Marvel, and the Iron Ageclaims Megaton Man <strong>by</strong> Don Simpson, many parodies <strong>of</strong> Batman:<strong>The</strong> Dark Knight Returns, and Marvel’s What Th?. Interestingly,the Bronze Age appears never to have developed a successfulparody, which might account for its late emergence as an age in thenomenclature <strong>of</strong> fandom. 103 It remains unclear at this point if theRenaissance Age has spawned any. 104<strong>The</strong> Reconstructive StageSchatz does not discuss what happens when a genre completesthe cycle, perhaps because when his book came out in 1981none <strong>of</strong> the genres he discusses (Western, gangster, hard-boileddetective, screwball comedy, musical, and the family melodrama)had definitively or clearly begun a new cycle. Following Schatz’sreasoning, though, it would seem that after the baroque stagewears itself out that a new experimental stage should arise. Thisnew stage has arisen in a number <strong>of</strong> genres since Schatz wrote,including superhero comics, the Western, the musical, and romanticcomedy. 105I take the name <strong>of</strong> the new stage from a comment Kurt Busiekmade in Astro City #5. A reader wrote in to ask, “Is Astro City arevisionist superhero work?” Busiek responded:As for whether the book is revisionist—