Courtside This issue - The Law Society of Tasmania
Courtside This issue - The Law Society of Tasmania
Courtside This issue - The Law Society of Tasmania
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2<br />
From the Chief Justice<br />
In January I had the pleasure <strong>of</strong><br />
announcing the five Family Court<br />
recipients <strong>of</strong> the Australia Day<br />
Achievement Medallion. Being part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the selection process for this award<br />
is a very rewarding aspect <strong>of</strong> my<br />
position. I extend my congratulations<br />
to this year’s recipients – Stephen<br />
Ralph, Peter Francis, Dennis Beissner,<br />
Elizabeth Hore and Susan Weise.<br />
You can read in detail about the<br />
achievements <strong>of</strong> these staff on pages<br />
1 and 4.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Court is presently preparing<br />
for the work associated with Less<br />
Adversarial Trials pursuant to Division<br />
12A <strong>of</strong> the Family <strong>Law</strong> Act 1975 (Cth)<br />
for matters filed after 1 July 2006.<br />
In Melbourne a trial `Blitz’ has<br />
taken place to reduce the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> cases which were filed prior to<br />
1 July 2006 and await hearing. In<br />
addition to the work <strong>of</strong> 9 local<br />
Judges, a further 3 Judges from<br />
interstate also provided assistance<br />
during the `Blitz’ period in<br />
Melbourne. Where appropriate,<br />
cases were transferred to the<br />
Federal Magistrates Court. Early<br />
reports indicate that this process<br />
has been very effective in clearing<br />
a significant number <strong>of</strong> matters<br />
awaiting trial.<br />
<strong>The</strong> work <strong>of</strong> court staff during<br />
this busy period was an essential<br />
component <strong>of</strong> the success <strong>of</strong> the<br />
‘Blitz’. I thank all staff involved<br />
for their extra efforts during this<br />
challenging time.<br />
In Brisbane, over five consecutive<br />
days in February, a joint callover<br />
<strong>of</strong> identified cases was held with<br />
Justice Carmody and Federal<br />
Magistrate Michael Baumann<br />
both on the bench. Where cases<br />
were transferred to the Federal<br />
Magistrates Court, directions<br />
and trial dates were immediately<br />
provided; otherwise directions were<br />
made for the progression <strong>of</strong> each<br />
<strong>of</strong> the matters that remained. <strong>The</strong><br />
callover was very effective. Of<br />
the 276 matters mentioned, 170<br />
were transferred to the Federal<br />
Magistrates Court, final orders were<br />
made in 24 cases, 26 applications<br />
were discontinued and directions<br />
were made for the progression <strong>of</strong><br />
the balance <strong>of</strong> 56 matters.<br />
<strong>The</strong> diminution <strong>of</strong> the cases<br />
awaiting a hearing filed prior to 1<br />
July 2006, will enable the Court to<br />
restructure listings to accommodate<br />
the hearing <strong>of</strong> Less Adversarial<br />
Trials and the introduction <strong>of</strong> an<br />
individual Judicial Docket.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Family Court is increasingly<br />
focused upon the more complex<br />
family law cases, with the less<br />
complex matters moving to the<br />
Federal Magistrates Court. <strong>This</strong><br />
transition is <strong>of</strong> particular importance<br />
to the Adelaide Registry where the<br />
recent retirement <strong>of</strong> Justice Murray<br />
has required the Court to develop a<br />
streaming model.<br />
A workshop was held in Adelaide<br />
on 1 February to consider the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> a streaming<br />
model pilot for family law<br />
applications.<br />
THE HON DIANA BRYANT<br />
A streaming model will require<br />
all cases to be commenced in<br />
the Federal Magistrates Court<br />
and be transferred to the Family<br />
Court where appropriate, with the<br />
exception <strong>of</strong> ‘special jurisdiction’<br />
cases (for example, Hague<br />
cases) which will be listed in<br />
the Family Court. A model <strong>of</strong><br />
solicitor certification is also being<br />
developed, whereby solicitors<br />
indicate that a particular dispute<br />
is appropriate to be heard in the<br />
Family Court. <strong>This</strong> process is<br />
subject to review by a Registrar.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re were 28 participants in the<br />
workshop including members <strong>of</strong><br />
the Family Court judiciary and<br />
Federal Magistrates, court staff and<br />
representatives from the Attorney-<br />
General’s Department.<br />
<strong>The</strong> participants agreed on a<br />
proposed streaming model<br />
and are working towards the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
Finally, I welcome a number <strong>of</strong><br />
significant appointments from<br />
within the Family Court. <strong>The</strong> Court’s<br />
Deputy Chief Justice, John Faulks<br />
has been appointed to the Family<br />
<strong>Law</strong> Council. Deputy Chief Justice<br />
Faulks was previously a chairman<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Family <strong>Law</strong> Council. <strong>The</strong><br />
Council makes a vital contribution<br />
to the development <strong>of</strong> family law<br />
and I congratulate his Honour on his<br />
appointment to this important role.<br />
I also extend my congratulations<br />
to Charlotte Kelly and Leanne<br />
Spelleken, former Senior Registrars<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Family Court, who have<br />
recently been appointed as Federal<br />
Magistrates. <strong>The</strong>y will serve as<br />
Federal Magistrates in Adelaide and<br />
Brisbane respectively.<br />
COURTSIDE ~ April March 2006 2007