{ void m1() {…} }

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Giving semantics of some feature by translating it away Programs translated in (equivalent) programs thatdon’t use the featureExtendedLanguageLanguage Extension flattened intothe vanilla languageclass C2 {void m1() {…}void m2() {…}} Let’s see pros and consclass C2 extends C1 {void m2() {…}}
class C1 {void m1() {…}}class C2 extends C1 {void m2() {…}}class C3 extends C2 {void m3() {…}}class C1 {void m1() {…}}class C2 {void m1() {…}void m2() {…}}class C3 {void m1() {…}void m2() {…}void m3() {…}}
Page 2: Flattening and Direct semantics By
Page 5: class C1 {void m1() {…}}class C2
Page 9 and 10: class C1 {void m1() {…}}class C2
Page 12 and 13: Please think how you’d implement
Page 14 and 15: Needs to know whatextends means For
Page 19 and 20: Nice per se More than that, can enc
Page 23 and 24: class C merge{abstract void m();fro
Page 25 and 26: class C { // equivalent flattened d
Page 27 and 28: class A {abstract void m();frozen i
Page 29 and 30: lookup(B, answer) = lookup(ClassExp

{ void m1() {…} }

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?