66 Dr. Et,helwynn <strong>Trewavas</strong> onIn 1927 Ah1 * published descriptions <strong>of</strong> some new NyasaCichlitlz, part <strong>of</strong> a large collcction in the Berlin Museum.He has kindly allowed me to examine the typcs <strong>of</strong> theso inBcrlin. Nichols and LaMonte (Amer. Mus. Novit. no. 451,1931)described two species which they believed to be new, buttheir Haplochromis centropristoides is H. callipterus, and theirH. boultoni is a young specimen <strong>of</strong> H. czruleus.A revision <strong>of</strong> the genus Lethrinops, based on the Christycollection, has already been published (<strong>Trewavas</strong>, Ann. &Mag. Nat. Hist. (10) vii. 1931, p. 133-152). I have nowto add one more species to this genus, and I give a synopsis<strong>of</strong> the remaining Nyasa genera and <strong>of</strong> their species.Twenty-three genera are here recognized, <strong>of</strong> which twentyare endemic and fourteen are monotypic. Of the one hundredand se-venty-five species comprised in these genera, onehr~ndrcd and one belong to the large genus Hapbchromis.IIaplochm~tis cnllipterus is closoly related to Ii. m<strong>of</strong>fati <strong>of</strong>South Africa; it differs from thc other Nyasa species <strong>of</strong>Haplochrmis in having the caudal rounded, and scaled onlyat the base. Of the remaining forms Regan has written -" In the Nyassa species the caudal fin is truncate or emarginate,and appears to be always nearly completely coveredwith small scales in the adult fish ; this feature, the prevalence<strong>of</strong> a few distinctive types <strong>of</strong> coloration, and the absence <strong>of</strong>evident relationship to species found elsewhere lead to theconclusion that the Nyassa species are a natural group andmay, perhaps, have evolved in the Iake from a single ancestralform." Even in young fish, although scales may be absentfrom thc central part <strong>of</strong> the caudal fin, they extend along theuppcr and lower rays ncnrly to the ond.Efforts to divide the Nyasa Haplochromis into smaller generahave been unsatisfactory. On the contrary, it has beennecessary to merge in it three previously recognized genera,as is explained below. It would be possible to take certainextreme forms and to define them as genera, but as thesewould be monotypic the main genus would not be muchdecreased. <strong>The</strong> guiding principle has been that monotypicgenera have been formed for peculiar species only whenthey are isolated, and have no obvious close relationshipwit,h a more generalized form, whereas a species such asIfaplochrmis melanonotus, which is closely related to H. semipabatus,sp. n., is left wit'hin the genus, even although thismakes its definition more difficult.Full descriptions <strong>of</strong> all the species have been written,and figures <strong>of</strong> all the new ones have been prepared, and* .sitzungsbcr. Ges. naturf. Fr. Berlin, July 1926 (1927), pp. 51-62.
the Cicl~lid <strong>Fishes</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> Nyasa.will be published when a monograph <strong>of</strong> the African Ciolilidah