12.07.2015 Views

Bird surveys at wetlands in Punjab, Pakistan ... - Oriental Bird Club

Bird surveys at wetlands in Punjab, Pakistan ... - Oriental Bird Club

Bird surveys at wetlands in Punjab, Pakistan ... - Oriental Bird Club

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 ZULFIQAR ALI and MUHAMMAD AKHTARForktail 21 (2005)Table 1. W<strong>at</strong>erbirds recorded <strong>at</strong> 16 sites <strong>in</strong> <strong>Punjab</strong>, <strong>Pakistan</strong>.Site Observ<strong>at</strong>ion po<strong>in</strong>ts White-headed Duck Other w<strong>at</strong>erbirdsCoord<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>esAltitude (m)D<strong>at</strong>e of survey(2003)Rawal lake 33 o 41’E 73 o 07’N 530 28 Jan 7 6 (1987) 1902 30% 62 3,089Kallar Kahar lake 32 o 46’E 72 o 42’N 641 28 Jan 0 90 (1972) 220 30% 91 1,246Shahpur (Jehlum bridge) 32 o 18’E 72 o 24’N 175 29 Jan 0 5 (1930) 1350 60% 93 1,248Jahlar lake 32 o 30’E 72 o 54’N 824 29 Jan 2 148 (1994) 100 40% 53 370Khabbaki lake 32 o 37’E 72 o 13’N 745 29 Jan 0 1,005 (1968) 283 100% 130 342Ucchali lake 32 o 33’E 72 o 25’N 760 29 Jan 22 667 (1987) 943 60% 103 1,591Nammal lake 32 o 41’E 71 o 48’N 340 29 Jan 2 400 (1970) 486 50% 115 1,726Rangpur lake 32 o 10’E 71 o 50’N 180 30 Jan 0 2 (1993) 1,250 0% 110 9,256Chashma barrage (Mianwali) 32 o 31’E 71 o 29’N 200 30 Jan 0 1 (1922) 33,109 0% 126 71,008Kharar lake 30 o 53’E 73 o 32’N 165 05 Feb 0 700 (1975) 235 100% 23 382Khangarh lake 29 o 52’E 71 o 67’N 100 06 Feb 0 1 (1883) 100 80% 35 257Sulmanki headworks (Bahawalnagar) 30 o 22’E 73 o 52’N 177 7 Feb 0 6 (1922) 1150 70% 85 5,821Chalianwala 32 o 37’E 73 o 38’N 235 19 Feb 0 11 (1931) 23 95% 30 90Qadirabad headworks (Hafizabad) 32 o 19’E 73 o 41’N 211 20 Feb 0 1 (1911) 2,850 20% 101 9,711Marala headworks (Sialkot) 32 o 40’E 74 o 28’N 242 20 Feb 0 1 (1891) 1650 10% 92 8,059Jassar (River Ravi) 32 o 31’E 74 o 59’N 334 21 Feb 0 70 (1987) 1125 70% 91 4,588Total 33 1,039 (1968) 46,746 51% 149 118,784No.Previous max.no. (year)Area (ha)Reduction <strong>in</strong> area1990–2003No. speciesrecordedNo. <strong>in</strong>dividualsrecordedMundkur 2003).These impacts are likely to be exacerb<strong>at</strong>edby the effects of global clim<strong>at</strong>e change.In <strong>Pakistan</strong>, 889 were counted <strong>in</strong> 1987–1988, butnumbers have decl<strong>in</strong>ed substantially s<strong>in</strong>ce then, andfewer than 50 have been recorded s<strong>in</strong>ce 1995–1996(Chaudhry et al. 1997). S<strong>in</strong>ce the l<strong>at</strong>e 1980s, WhiteheadedDuck have been known to w<strong>in</strong>ter <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pakistan</strong>only <strong>at</strong> Ucchali, Khabbaki and Jahlar (known collectivelyas Ucchali <strong>wetlands</strong> complex, a Ramsar site s<strong>in</strong>ce1996). It is not clear, however, whether the lack ofsight<strong>in</strong>gs elsewhere is because the birds are absent orbecause of <strong>in</strong>adequ<strong>at</strong>e <strong>surveys</strong>.The goal of this survey, therefore, was to look forthis species and assess its st<strong>at</strong>us <strong>at</strong> the 16 sites <strong>in</strong><strong>Punjab</strong> where it had been recorded s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1880s:Rawal lake, Kallar Kahar lake, Shahpur (Jehlumbridge), Jahlar lake, Khabbaki lake, Uchalli lake,Nammal lake, Rangpur lake, Mianwali (Chashmabarrage), Kharar lake, Khangarh lake, Bahawalnagar(Sulmanki headworks), Chalianwala, Hafizabad(Qadrabad headworks), Sialkot (Marala headworks)and Jassar (River Ravi) (Fig. 1; Appendix 1).METHODSObserv<strong>at</strong>ions were made, usually for a full day, <strong>at</strong> eachof the 16 sites, between 28 January and 21 February2003. Up to five po<strong>in</strong>ts per site were selected fromwhich the whole site could be observed. At each po<strong>in</strong>t,birds were counted us<strong>in</strong>g a telescope before mov<strong>in</strong>g tothe next po<strong>in</strong>t as rapidly as possible without disturb<strong>in</strong>gthe birds. <strong>Bird</strong>s were identified us<strong>in</strong>g Grimmett et al.(2001). The surface area of w<strong>at</strong>er <strong>at</strong> each site wascalcul<strong>at</strong>ed from a map plotted us<strong>in</strong>g coord<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>esrecorded with a Magellan GPS; then the % reductions<strong>in</strong>ce 1990 (IUCN 1990) was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed.RESULTSIn total, 118,784 <strong>in</strong>dividuals of 149 species werecounted <strong>at</strong> the 16 sites (Table 1; Appendix 2).Chashma lake, Qadirabad headworks, Rangpur lake,Marala headworks, Sulmanki headworks, Jassar (Raviriver) and Rawal lake had the highest numbers of<strong>in</strong>dividuals. A total of 33 White-headed Ducks werecounted <strong>at</strong> four sites: Ucchali (22 <strong>in</strong>dividuals), Jahlar(two), Nammal (two) and Rawal lake (seven).The highest numbers of species were <strong>at</strong> Chashma(126 species), Nammal (115), Rangpur (110), andUcchali (103) lakes. The ten most abundant specieswere: Eurasian Coot Fulica <strong>at</strong>ra, Common PochardAythya fer<strong>in</strong>a, Northern P<strong>in</strong>tail Anas acuta, GadwallAnas strepera, Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis,Mallard Anas pl<strong>at</strong>yrhynchos, Northern Shoveler Anasclype<strong>at</strong>a,W<strong>at</strong>er Rail Rallus aqu<strong>at</strong>icus, Black-w<strong>in</strong>ged StiltHimantopus himantopus and Red-w<strong>at</strong>tled Lapw<strong>in</strong>gVanellus <strong>in</strong>dicus.White-headed Ducks were recorded only <strong>at</strong>Ucchali, Jahlar, Nammal and Rawal lakes, and wereabsent from all other sites from which the species wasknown historically. Many sites had significantlyreduced w<strong>at</strong>er surface areas compared to d<strong>at</strong>apresented <strong>in</strong> IUCN (1990), with an overall reduction<strong>at</strong> all sites comb<strong>in</strong>ed of 51%. Khabbaki, Kharrar,Chalianwala and Khangarh had all suffered 80–100%reductions <strong>in</strong> area s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1990 figures. The likelycauses of these shr<strong>in</strong>kages <strong>in</strong>clude ground w<strong>at</strong>erextraction, development of barrages and canal systems.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!