12.07.2015 Views

Commonwealth v. Kerrigan

Commonwealth v. Kerrigan

Commonwealth v. Kerrigan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. A32034/06It was explained by Doctor Van Brakle that genital wartsare transmitted primarily, although not exclusively, by “genitalto genital contact.” HPV is the most common sexuallytransmitted disease amongst adolescents in the United States.This virus is associated with a variety of genital cancers,including cervical cancer. In fact, A.R. is at a higher risk ofdeveloping cervical cancer or cancer of the rectum because sheis HPV positive. “It’s thought that, at least eighty percent . . .perhaps ninety percent of cervical cancer is a result of a previousHPV infection.” Finally, Doctor Van Brakle rendered the opinionthat evidence of sexual abuse was present.A.R. disclosed that [<strong>Kerrigan</strong>] began touching her whenshe lived in New Jersey. Following their arrival at the WhittierApartments, the abuse continued and escalated to vaginal andanal intercourse. The repeated incidents of sexual abuse tookplace in various rooms within the home while her mother waseither not home or sleeping. They also increased as she gotolder with the most frequency at their last residence inCatasauqua [Pennsylvania].Trial Court Opinion (“T.C.O.”), 11/07/05, at 3-4 (footnotes omitted). 5 Following his trial, a jury found <strong>Kerrigan</strong> guilty on all counts and thetrial court sentenced him to twenty-five to fifty years’ imprisonment.<strong>Kerrigan</strong> filed post-sentence motions, which the trial court denied. <strong>Kerrigan</strong>then filed this appeal with our Court, and presents the following list ofquestions for our review:I. Was the evidence insufficient to support the convictionwhich required penile penetration as an element becausethere was insufficient evidence to establish that any crimeinvolving penile penetration as an element thereofoccurred in Pennsylvania?II.Did the court lack subject matter jurisdiction over thecrimes involving penile penetration?-4-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!