12.07.2015 Views

Judgment in Pet.68.2002 - GERC

Judgment in Pet.68.2002 - GERC

Judgment in Pet.68.2002 - GERC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Petn.No.68/2002M/s.Searchchem’s own units located at Vapi and Ankleshwar, was grantedsubject to the conditions mentioned there<strong>in</strong>. As per the provisions of ConditionNo.1, erstwhile GEB was allowed to bill as per the exist<strong>in</strong>g Contract Demand of25000 KVA, where as the concerned <strong>in</strong>dustry was allowed to pay as per thereduced contract demand of 6250 KVA i.e. 25%. It was clarified <strong>in</strong> the said letterdated 2.7.1998 that this ad-hoc arrangement shall come <strong>in</strong>to force w.e.f. 22.6.1998and rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> force till either the recipient company or supply<strong>in</strong>g companycont<strong>in</strong>ues to hold 40% of issued share capital <strong>in</strong> the other company. As decidedby Government, at relevant po<strong>in</strong>t of time, this was an absolutely stop-gap ad-hocarrangement to take care of the long pend<strong>in</strong>g demand of <strong>in</strong>dustry and subject tothe adjustments as per the provisions of f<strong>in</strong>al policy. This decision of theGovernment has also been reflected <strong>in</strong> para 10 of the Captive Power Policyannounced vide Government GR dated 9.11.1998. The same has been repeated <strong>in</strong>the letter dt.28.10.1999, from Jo<strong>in</strong>t Secretary to Government, Energy &Petrochemicals Department addressed to Member (F<strong>in</strong>ance) erstwhile GEB. Asper the provisions of f<strong>in</strong>al policy for captive power, as conta<strong>in</strong>ed under para 8 ofGR dated 9.11.1998, the <strong>in</strong>dustries on commission<strong>in</strong>g of Captive Power Plants,require to be allowed to reduce their exist<strong>in</strong>g contract demand up to a level of25% of their orig<strong>in</strong>al Contract Demand. The reduction <strong>in</strong> Contract Demandallowed to the unit on ad-hoc basis (i.e. upto 25%) is exactly <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e of thisprovision. “As per the provisions of Para 10 of the said GR dated 9.11.1998, thead-hoc arrangement sanctioned by Government vide letter dated 2.7.1998 has tobe regularized as per the provisions of the Captive Power Policy-1998 w.e.f.22.6.1998 i.e. from the date of commencement of the ad-hoc arrangement grantedearlier”.[16] In view of letter dt.28.10.1999 and <strong>in</strong> view of Affidavit filed by the Governmentof Gujarat on 6.9.2006, the opponents have to take appropriate action <strong>in</strong> thematter of reduction of contract demand. It is clear from the above letter that theState Government had passed orders on 22.6.1998 to allow reduction <strong>in</strong> contractPage 16 of 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!