12.07.2015 Views

Capabilities of diffractive optical elements for real ... - ResearchGate

Capabilities of diffractive optical elements for real ... - ResearchGate

Capabilities of diffractive optical elements for real ... - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110.90.90.80.8Diffraction efficiency η0.70.60.50.40.30.2q = 7q = m = 6q = 5Diffraction efficiency η0.70.60.50.40.30.2q = 7q = m = 6q = 50.10.10400 450 500 550 600 650 700Illumination wavelength λ [nm]0400 450 500 550 600 650 700Illumination wavelength λ [nm](a) Mirror-type(b) Lens-type (acrylate)Figure 3. Diffraction efficiency over the wavelength <strong>for</strong> a multi-order DOE with m = 6 <strong>for</strong> λ 0 = 525 nm. The marginalshift <strong>of</strong> the sinc-functions <strong>for</strong> blue and red wavelengths in (b) is due to material dispersion n(λ). The blaze depth isassumed to be ideal (µ = 1).Optical per<strong>for</strong>mance. The <strong>optical</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> <strong>diffractive</strong> <strong>optical</strong> <strong>elements</strong> strongly depends on how accuratethe operation corresponds to the ideal situation which the DOE is designed <strong>for</strong>. This applies to bothvariations in the <strong>optical</strong> setup (operation wavelength, alignment), as well as minor fabrication inaccuracies (pr<strong>of</strong>iledepth, pattern distortion) <strong>of</strong> the DOE itself. Apart from alignment errors, which can be avoided by a carefuladjustment, a wavelength change will have an impact on the diffraction efficiency and the phase reconstruction.To address these influences a parameter α was established 11α = λ [ ]0 n(λ) − 1. (6)λ n(λ 0 ) − 1Pr<strong>of</strong>ile depth scaling errors will also influence the diffraction efficiency. In case <strong>of</strong> a constant pr<strong>of</strong>ile depth errorthis can be addressed by introducing a parameter 6 µ = t′t , (7)with t as the nominal and t ′ as the actual pr<strong>of</strong>ile depth. With the parameters α and µ the scalar diffractionefficiency <strong>of</strong> a multi-order DOE <strong>for</strong> the qth diffraction order is then given byη q = sinc 2 (αµm − q) . (8)If the argument <strong>of</strong> the sinc-function equals to zero, the diffraction efficiency will have a maximum. Fig. 3shows the diffraction efficiency vs. wavelength <strong>of</strong> a ’5/6/7’ multi-order DOE designed <strong>for</strong> λ 0 = 525 nm and m = 6.As it can be seen in Fig. 3(a) besides the green efficiency peak there are further maxima at the blaze-matchedwavelengths <strong>of</strong> 450 nm (q = 7) and 630 nm (q = 5). To illustrate the minor influence <strong>of</strong> material dispersion wehave distinguished between (a) reflective and (b) transmissive multi-order DOE. Figure 4 indicates the efficiencydependence on blaze depth scaling errors <strong>for</strong> different blaze orders. In contrast to a standard first-order blazedDOE, the multi-order DOE’s efficiency is much more sensitive to potential fabrication inaccuracies. For theabove mentioned ’5/6/7’-design <strong>for</strong> example, a variation in the blaze depth <strong>of</strong> only 5% will result in an efficiencydrop to 65% (blue) or 81% (red), respectively.On the other hand, the aberrations <strong>of</strong> multi-order DOE are highly wavelength-sensitive too. Unaberratedwavefronts <strong>for</strong> all wavelengths will be generated only if the operation wavelengths exactly match the design69124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!