12.07.2015 Views

hindustani fanatics, india's pashtuns, and deobandism – connections

hindustani fanatics, india's pashtuns, and deobandism – connections

hindustani fanatics, india's pashtuns, and deobandism – connections

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hindustani Fanatics, India’s Pashtuns, <strong>and</strong> Deob<strong>and</strong>ism – Connectionsthat he had prepared a contingency plan in case of his death after which his disappearance would allow his heirs to claim that he was now a “HiddenImam” who was continuing the jihad from a cave, again borrowing from the Shi’a.Again, it is Charles Allen who got this part of history right:“Various qualifications were required of the Imam-Mahdi. He would be an imam <strong>and</strong> a caliph, bear the name Muhammad, be a descendentof the Prophet through his daughter Fatima, arise in Arabia <strong>and</strong> be forty years old at the time of his emergence. Syed Ahmad Shah fulfilled the mostimportant of these qualifications: he was a Saiyyed, had been raised as ‘Muhammad’ (of which ‘Ahmad’ was a diminutive), <strong>and</strong> he became forty in1826. In January of that year he began his hijra accompanied by a b<strong>and</strong> of some four hundred armed <strong>and</strong> committed jihadis.” 54The British seem to have generally ignored Sayed Ahmad Shah’s activities. His stated enemies were the Sikhs <strong>and</strong> it is very probable that aslong as the Islamic revolutionaries surrounding him were focused on the Sikhs, the British derived some benefit from their activities. According toHafeez Malik, “When two thous<strong>and</strong>s Moslems had congregated in Rai Bareli to sacrifice their lives in the war with the Sikhs, Shahid decided that thetime was right.” 55His route westward had to bypass the Sikh territories of Ranjit Singh <strong>and</strong> this newly created Amir of India’s jihadis departed Tonk’s relativesafety along a southerly route through Sind <strong>and</strong> across Baluchistan through six hundred miles of difficult, sometimes desert terrain to Afghanistan’sK<strong>and</strong>ahar before they turned toward the north to Kabul. Finding little support there, Sayed Ahmad Shah’s little army marched east through theKhyber Pass to arrive in the vicinity of Peshawar.A man who lost his life while working among the Pashtuns, Sir Pierre Louis Napoleon Cavagnari, wrote about the arrival of Sayed AhmadShah into Yusufzai territory:“About the year 1823 appeared one of those religious impostors on the arena of Yusafzai politics who have at all times <strong>and</strong> seasons beguiledthe incredulous <strong>and</strong> simple Pathan race for their own ends, <strong>and</strong> have been the means of creating discord, up-heaving society, <strong>and</strong> fomenting rebellionswhich have been checked <strong>and</strong> crushed with the utmost difficulty. The career of Pir Tarik in the 17 th century, <strong>and</strong> that of Sayad 56 Ahmad of Bareilly<strong>and</strong> the Akhud of Swat in the 19 th century, show but too clearly what single men are able to perform amongst the credulous Pathans. This man wasSayad Ahmad Shah 57 , a resident of Bareilly, who, after visiting Mecca-Kabul, suddenly appeared in the Peshawar district with about 40 Hindustani54. Ibid, pg. 79.55. Hafeez Malik, pg. 165.56. This paper uses the original rendering of this name.57. Allen, Charles, The Hidden Roots of Wahhabism in British India, World Policy Journal, Summer, 2005. Allen wrote “The man credited with importing Wahhabism intoIndia is Syed Ahmad of Rae Bareili (1786–1831), who returned from pilgrimage in Mecca in 1824 to begin a holy war against the Sikhs aimed at restoring the Punjab to Muslimrule. But the argument that Syed Ahmad picked up his ideas of Wahhabi intolerance <strong>and</strong> jihad while in Arabia is untenable. The reality is that he had already accepted the basictenets of Wahhabism long before sailing to Arabia, as a student of the Madrassa-i-Ramiyya religious seminary in Delhi <strong>and</strong> as a pupil of its leader, Shah Abdul Aziz, son of thereformer Shah Waliullah of Delhi. Shah Waliullah is the key figure here— a man as much admired within Sunni Islam as a great modernizer (the historian Aziz Ahmad rightlydescribes him as “the bridge between medieval <strong>and</strong> modern Islam in India”) as Abd al-Wahhab is reviled. The one, after all, was a follower of the tolerant, inclusive Hanafi schoolof jurisprudence <strong>and</strong> a Naqshb<strong>and</strong>i Sufi initiate, while the other belonged to the intolerant, exclusive Hanbali school, was viciously anti-Sufi <strong>and</strong> anti-Shia, <strong>and</strong> deeply indebtedTribal Analysis Center, 6610-M Mooretown Road, Box 159. Williamsburg, VA, 23188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!